Trump on the SAVE America Act: "It will assure the security of our crooked elections."

serenity said:
Believed philosophies are a faith followed beyond actual time alive since conception performed by people living cradle to grave saying 7 days a week isn't planned obsolescence to adapting in plain sight since chromosomes don't exist until conception.

Context last the generation gaps discussing what else is possible every day alive.

I at least explained how his comment was completely accurate while people taking sides call it gibberish.
Click to expand...


Ah, the eternal dance of human discourse! Here we have a magnificent example of what happens when someone attempts to tackle the Big Questions™ with the philosophical equivalent of a sledgehammer made of cotton candy. Let me unpack this delicious word salad with the reverence it deserves.

## The Great Conception Conundrum

Our intrepid thinker has stumbled upon something rather profound, albeit wrapped in linguistic bubble wrap. They're essentially asking: "When does belief begin?" It's like wondering if a tree makes a sound when it falls in a forest, except the tree is made of chromosomes and the forest is existential dread.

The notion that "chromosomes don't exist until conception" is scientifically adorable – like saying "cake doesn't exist until you mix the ingredients." Well, yes, technically the *specific combination* doesn't exist, but those chromosomes have been lounging around in their respective gametes like passengers waiting for the philosophical express train to Personhood Station.

## The Seven-Day Obsolescence Conspiracy

The observation about "7 days a week isn't planned obsolescence" is particularly delicious. It's as if our author discovered that calendars might be a conspiracy against human adaptation. Perhaps they're suggesting that our rigid weekly structure prevents us from evolving into beings who can photosynthesize on Wednesdays or hibernate through Monday meetings?

This connects to the "adapting in plain sight" concept – the idea that we're constantly evolving but too busy scrolling through social media to notice. It's like evolution's passive-aggressive cousin who leaves obvious clues that everyone ignores.

## Generation Gaps: The Ultimate Plot Twist

The "generation gaps discussing what else is possible" is where things get spicy. Each generation thinks they've invented questioning authority, much like how every teenager believes they're the first person to discover that adults are just winging it.

Generation Z thinks Millennials are ancient. Millennials think Boomers broke everything. Boomers think everyone after them can't function without participation trophies. Meanwhile, Gen X just sits in the corner, forgotten, drinking coffee and remembering when MTV played music videos.

## The Defense of the Indefensible

The real comedy gold lies in the final confession: "I at least explained how his comment was completely accurate while people taking sides call it gibberish." This is the philosophical equivalent of being the only person who understands modern art at a gallery opening.

"You see, when the artist painted a blue square, they were clearly commenting on the socioeconomic implications of azure consciousness in post-industrial maritime metaphysics!"

"Sir, that's just the wall. The painting fell down."

## The Method to the Madness

Here's the thing about seemingly incoherent philosophical rambling – sometimes it accidentally stumbles into truth. Like a drunk person taking a shortcut through a hedge maze and somehow finding the exit, our original commenter might be touching on something real:

- **Belief systems do outlast individual lives** ✓
- **We are constantly adapting while following inherited patterns** ✓
- **Generational perspectives create ongoing dialogue about possibilities** ✓
- **People often dismiss complex ideas as nonsense** ✓

## The Translator's Dilemma

Defending incomprehensible wisdom is a thankless job, like being a translator for someone who speaks fluent Philosophy Major after too much coffee. You know there's something meaningful buried in there, but extracting it requires archaeological-level patience and possibly a ouija board.

The real tragedy is that in our rush to choose sides – Team Gibberish vs. Team Profound – we miss the delicious irony that the most interesting conversations happen in the messy middle ground where sense and nonsense dance together like old friends at a wedding.

**The Bottom Line:** Sometimes the most accurate statements sound like gibberish because reality itself is pretty absurd. After all, we're talking apes hurtling through space on a rock, debating the nature of existence while our planet slowly becomes a greenhouse.

If that's not worthy of some beautifully confused philosophizing, what is?
 
countryboy said:
I was just returning your negative reps in kind. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Also, how could I be his sock if I joined four years before him? Have you had your blood checked for lead content, or are you naturally retarded?
Click to expand...
Don't make me laugh!!

Another posted complained about the negative reps and suddenly you are tagging my every post?

It's quite obvious what's going on. You're @Lionfish with posting from a different account.
 
Crepitus said:
Don't make me laugh!!

Another posted complained about the negative reps and suddenly you are tagging my every post?

It's quite obvious what's going on. You're @Lionfish with posting from a different account.
Click to expand...
You're really not that bright, are you. It was TOP who informed me about what negative repoing is, or "negging" as you leftist losers call it. Again, I was here years before Lionfish. But I get it, libs suck at math. I also get that you aren't a serious person (libs rarely are), and nothing more than a troll.
 
Crepitus said:
Ah, the eternal dance of human discourse! Here we have a magnificent example of what happens when someone attempts to tackle the Big Questions™ with the philosophical equivalent of a sledgehammer made of cotton candy. Let me unpack this delicious word salad with the reverence it deserves.

## The Great Conception Conundrum

Our intrepid thinker has stumbled upon something rather profound, albeit wrapped in linguistic bubble wrap. They're essentially asking: "When does belief begin?" It's like wondering if a tree makes a sound when it falls in a forest, except the tree is made of chromosomes and the forest is existential dread.

The notion that "chromosomes don't exist until conception" is scientifically adorable – like saying "cake doesn't exist until you mix the ingredients." Well, yes, technically the *specific combination* doesn't exist, but those chromosomes have been lounging around in their respective gametes like passengers waiting for the philosophical express train to Personhood Station.

## The Seven-Day Obsolescence Conspiracy

The observation about "7 days a week isn't planned obsolescence" is particularly delicious. It's as if our author discovered that calendars might be a conspiracy against human adaptation. Perhaps they're suggesting that our rigid weekly structure prevents us from evolving into beings who can photosynthesize on Wednesdays or hibernate through Monday meetings?

This connects to the "adapting in plain sight" concept – the idea that we're constantly evolving but too busy scrolling through social media to notice. It's like evolution's passive-aggressive cousin who leaves obvious clues that everyone ignores.

## Generation Gaps: The Ultimate Plot Twist

The "generation gaps discussing what else is possible" is where things get spicy. Each generation thinks they've invented questioning authority, much like how every teenager believes they're the first person to discover that adults are just winging it.

Generation Z thinks Millennials are ancient. Millennials think Boomers broke everything. Boomers think everyone after them can't function without participation trophies. Meanwhile, Gen X just sits in the corner, forgotten, drinking coffee and remembering when MTV played music videos.

## The Defense of the Indefensible

The real comedy gold lies in the final confession: "I at least explained how his comment was completely accurate while people taking sides call it gibberish." This is the philosophical equivalent of being the only person who understands modern art at a gallery opening.

"You see, when the artist painted a blue square, they were clearly commenting on the socioeconomic implications of azure consciousness in post-industrial maritime metaphysics!"

"Sir, that's just the wall. The painting fell down."

## The Method to the Madness

Here's the thing about seemingly incoherent philosophical rambling – sometimes it accidentally stumbles into truth. Like a drunk person taking a shortcut through a hedge maze and somehow finding the exit, our original commenter might be touching on something real:

- **Belief systems do outlast individual lives** ✓
- **We are constantly adapting while following inherited patterns** ✓
- **Generational perspectives create ongoing dialogue about possibilities** ✓
- **People often dismiss complex ideas as nonsense** ✓

## The Translator's Dilemma

Defending incomprehensible wisdom is a thankless job, like being a translator for someone who speaks fluent Philosophy Major after too much coffee. You know there's something meaningful buried in there, but extracting it requires archaeological-level patience and possibly a ouija board.

The real tragedy is that in our rush to choose sides – Team Gibberish vs. Team Profound – we miss the delicious irony that the most interesting conversations happen in the messy middle ground where sense and nonsense dance together like old friends at a wedding.

**The Bottom Line:** Sometimes the most accurate statements sound like gibberish because reality itself is pretty absurd. After all, we're talking apes hurtling through space on a rock, debating the nature of existence while our planet slowly becomes a greenhouse.

If that's not worthy of some beautifully confused philosophizing, what is?
Click to expand...
Nice list of metaphors and complete avoidance of natural time evolving in plain sight of biological results self evidently living as exactly adapting in space now.
 
countryboy said:
You're really not that bright, are you. It was TOP who informed me about what negative repoing is, or "negging" as you leftist losers call it. Again, I was here years before Lionfish. But I get it, libs suck at math. I also get that you aren't a serious person (libs rarely are), and nothing more than a troll.
Click to expand...
Sure, kid, sure. It's all just a coincidence, LMAO!!
 
Last edited:
serenity said:
Nice list of metaphors and complete avoidance of natural time evolving in plain sight of biological results self evidently living as exactly adapting in space now.
Click to expand...
Whoa there, word-wizard! You've just served up a philosophical word salad with extra existential dressing! 🥗

Sounds like you're calling out someone for getting all metaphor-y and fancy-schmancy while totally missing the obvious biological boogie happening right in front of their eyeballs. Like, "Hey buddy, stop waxing poetic about butterflies representing transformation when there's literally a caterpillar doing the ACTUAL transforming right there!" 🐛➡️🦋

You're basically saying: "Quit the flowery language dance and look at the real-time biological disco happening in the here-and-now!"

It's like complaining that someone wrote a 500-page novel about the symbolism of bread while ignoring the actual sandwich getting moldy on the counter. Very "touch grass" energy, but make it *scientific*!

Did I decode your delightfully dense philosophical puzzle correctly, or should I put on my thinking cap and try again? 🤔✨
 
Crepitus said:
Whoa there, word-wizard! You've just served up a philosophical word salad with extra existential dressing! 🥗

Sounds like you're calling out someone for getting all metaphor-y and fancy-schmancy while totally missing the obvious biological boogie happening right in front of their eyeballs. Like, "Hey buddy, stop waxing poetic about butterflies representing transformation when there's literally a caterpillar doing the ACTUAL transforming right there!" 🐛➡️🦋

You're basically saying: "Quit the flowery language dance and look at the real-time biological disco happening in the here-and-now!"

It's like complaining that someone wrote a 500-page novel about the symbolism of bread while ignoring the actual sandwich getting moldy on the counter. Very "touch grass" energy, but make it *scientific*!

Did I decode your delightfully dense philosophical puzzle correctly, or should I put on my thinking cap and try again? 🤔✨
Click to expand...
Explaining self evident process of evolving one at a time as ancestrally positoned in daily global population left alive next rotation of the planet isn't a philosophy of anything else is possible, tomorrow, spoken 7 days a week.

It is an actual brain adapting in plain sight since arrived a fertilize cell changing form each heartbeat forward as currently shaped typing this response as a sole result of biological results in the homo sapiens' species inhabiting tme daily here.

Series parallel compounding results never same details twice and results never stay same form at death as it was when conceived to replace its 124 relatives lived in previous 6 generations prior to its conception.

Need I do the numbers to every ancestors last 6 generation gaps of global population proportions in last 2 centuries?

One's arrival as a son or daughter, grandchild, great grandchild, great great grandchild is 30 people involved with the grandchild chromosomes in the 23 strand double helix of ancestral lineage results. now let me add 2 more previous generation gaps. 32 great great great grandparents, then the prior of 64 great great great great grandparents.

126 direct descendants in previous 2 centuries created 99% dominate genes of each son or daughter born daily here. Everything else is recessive genes going back to inception of original 5 ancestral lineages of this species. 4 of which are native to the Asian/European/Northern African continents to which 82% of global populaiton is still on those 3 geographical areas.


America didn't create that over populated areas. Ironic how all urban settings behave the same way socially. Why dictatorships an democracy failed every time in history and current events.

People aren't the species by context, Ancestors are the population as genetically alive now. Life works in series parallel time, not relative time logistics.

Relative time logistics is what corrupted ancestries last 7,000 years by choice.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top