Woman Who ‘Credibly Accused’ Trump of Sex With a Minor Reportedly Had Her Records Removed From Epstein Files

Crepitus said:
Do you realize that this is the second time this accusation has come up?


You think two people thought it up independently and got all the details right?

Your orange idol is a chomo.
Click to expand...
Oh, so repetition makes it true? More likely one person started a rumor and other people repeated it, and now those who want to believe it are pointing to those repeated claims and saying that's why it's true.
 
Trump had been hanging around Florida for a few years, but did not buy Mar a lago till Dec 85....likely did not spend much time there for many months after this being Trump demanding perfection (and this property had long been let go) ......when did he meet Epstein?

When did they become close enough that Epstein might have been recommending pussy to Trump?

Please be specific.
 
signalmankenneth said:
The New Republic reported this week that accusations made by a woman who “credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein,” appeared to have been removed from the Epstein files.

TNR reporter Edith Olmsted wrote that “A 21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens,” Olmsted wrote. “When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.”

The report continued:



https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/woman-credibly-accused-trump-sex-220809049.html

View attachment 75984

View attachment 75985
Click to expand...
Of course. Whatever you say
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Probably because the claims were so ludicrous they were dismissed out-of-hand.
Click to expand...
No probably not.

The idea that hundreds of women were victims of Epsteins and that he was using them only for himself is the ludicrous thing to think.

That it would not generate investigations in the US and yet we see powerful men NOW BEING CHARGED in other countries, PROVES there was credible information in their to investigate.

You like to pretend you do not GAF about this sex stuff but you expose yourself as you s REALLY CARE to say ludicrous things as a way to defend Trump and DoJ.
 
QP! said:
No probably not.

The idea that hundreds of women were victims of Epsteins and that he was using them only for himself is the ludicrous thing to think.

That it would not generate investigations in the US and yet we see powerful men NOW BEING CHARGED in other countries, PROVES there was credible information in their to investigate.

You like to pretend you do not GAF about this sex stuff but you expose yourself as you s REALLY CARE to say ludicrous things as a way to defend Trump and DoJ.
Click to expand...
Did you look at the list of names supposedly involved in that one? You'd have to be insane to accept all of those people were present at Mar-a-Lago, while Trump was President--first time or whatever--and that the Secret Service and other security present didn't know shit about this going on, or didn't have a complete list of people present, etc.

Note, that of the names on the list for that entry, Alan Dershowitz's first name is spelled wrong in all uses (one l versus two), and that Bob Shapiro is a nickname rather than Robert Shapiro which would be his legal name. Errors like those don't argue in favor of this being factual.

It is fucking insanely stupid. It is beyond stupid. Sure, Trump and Epstein knew each other and likely did some shit together, but that doesn't mean everything in that list as presented is factual or true.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top