Woman Who ‘Credibly Accused’ Trump of Sex With a Minor Reportedly Had Her Records Removed From Epstein Files

Jake Starkey said:
People are now being investigated, now being charged, and, T. A., it is not going to stop.
Click to expand...
It never started in America. In Europe, people are being charged and fired. The Ambassador to America was dismissed for Epsteining. Here in America where it started, nobody charged. Is there anyone who does not think Trump was involved? He and Jeff were best friends. They had homes very close to each other in NYC and Florida. They were both big womanizers who had no respect for women. It should have started with Trump.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Did you look at the list of names supposedly involved in that one? You'd have to be insane to accept all of those people were present at Mar-a-Lago, while Trump was President--first time or whatever--and that the Secret Service and other security present didn't know shit about this going on, or didn't have a complete list of people present, etc.

Note, that of the names on the list for that entry, Alan Dershowitz's first name is spelled wrong in all uses (one l versus two), and that Bob Shapiro is a nickname rather than Robert Shapiro which would be his legal name. Errors like those don't argue in favor of this being factual.

It is fucking insanely stupid. It is beyond stupid. Sure, Trump and Epstein knew each other and likely did some shit together, but that doesn't mean everything in that list as presented is factual or true.
Click to expand...
Does not matter Terry.

To say there is NOTHING, ZERO in the files that would even make the Trump DoJ begin an investigation is complete BS even if you thought 90% of what was alleged was BS.

There is no defense for a BLANKET declaration of 'WE WILL INVESTIGATE NOTHING AS WE CAN DECLARE WITHOUT INVESTIGATION THERE IS NOTHING THERE', as that now blows up as foreign countries charge people in the files. Something they could have done decades ago if it was investigated after the Acosta/ GWBSr term, by any DoJ that followed.

The very fact you you feel the need to defend to the death the position that 'nothing should have been done' in a case with one of the biggest pedophiles in US history and his deep connections to elite rich men, just shows how deep your TDS runs. And when you say in your next breath 'you just don't care about this stuff', you need to say 'when it is anything negative about Trump', as you clearly care A LOT TO COMMENT, when you are defending Trump and his DoJ.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Did you look at the list of names supposedly involved in that one? You'd have to be insane to accept all of those people were present at Mar-a-Lago, while Trump was President--first time or whatever--and that the Secret Service and other security present didn't know shit about this going on, or didn't have a complete list of people present, etc.

Note, that of the names on the list for that entry, Alan Dershowitz's first name is spelled wrong in all uses (one l versus two), and that Bob Shapiro is a nickname rather than Robert Shapiro which would be his legal name. Errors like those don't argue in favor of this being factual.

It is fucking insanely stupid. It is beyond stupid. Sure, Trump and Epstein knew each other and likely did some shit together, but that doesn't mean everything in that list as presented is factual or true.
Click to expand...
Oh, man. Look at all TA's post screaming "it's just a rumor" and "fake news". Boy - you're right on board with the trump team coverup - the problem is - MAGA doesn't like it either - trump's not only losing independent support but MAGA support now!

But, obviously what's in the Epstein files will do more harm to trump than losing congress this November!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
In terms of criminal charges, beyond reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
That didn't stop you from convicting Biden for 4 years, trumptard, based on hearsay from a criminal.

Now you see that the Epstein coverup is doing Republicans harm and you've taken to JPP to make gaslight post after gaslight post.

You are one terrified trumptard bitch.

Bitch.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
In terms of criminal charges, beyond reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
That's required for a conviction, not a charge/trial.

Plus it's a standard the current DOJ manifestly does NOT abide by when charging tRump's political enemies so you are pushing a ridicolously obvious double standard.

Then again, if it wasn't for double standards you tRumplings wouldn't have any standards at all so.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top