Remind Me

IBDaMann said:
Why do leftists claim "Global Warming"? It's because they are all gullible, scientifically illiterate and are simply told to regurgitate that the earth's average equilibrium temperature is somehow rising, right? I haven't missed anything, right?

www.facebook.com

99K views · 3.8K reactions | Great Lakes Ice Keeps Expanding In 2026 | Electroverse

Great Lakes Ice Keeps Expanding In 2026
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
Click to expand...

The left has raked in trillions of dollars from the AGW hoax. That hoax has largely collapsed, much like the Enron scam. But the left thinks they can scam a few more billion from the scheme before it completely collapses.
 
IBDaMann said:
I read your post. You demonize AI tools and any people who find AI useful.


I was just commenting how socket wrenches and needle-nose pliers brought about the last wave of totalitarianism.


... along with Python debuggers.


I'm working on using Copilot to take over the world.
Click to expand...

Gotta admit, I generally write a stub up of Python code these days and let Claude flesh it out to a functioning app.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
The printing press will put all the scribes out in the streets! It must be banned!!!

Luddite arguments have never changed as each new era approached.
Click to expand...
new inventions have never threatened to put this many people out of work at once.

AI is stupid on all level and only dum dum Nazis like it.

plus its wrong and unreliable technology.
 
Monad Portal said:
new inventions have never threatened to put this many people out of work at once.
Click to expand...

As the printing press did?

Monad Portal said:
AI is stupid on all level and only dum dum Nazis like it.
Click to expand...

ROFL

Exactly the same idiocy spewed about computers in the 1950's - then microcomputers in the 70's - then the internet in the 80's. The phrases are the same with only the keyword changed.

Each time, advancement of technology improved the lives of billions of people. AI is no different.

Excuse me now, I need to go jam with the AI generated backing band on my Spark smart amp... (Not a joke)
 
Monad Portal said:
how many layoffs are they anticipating AI will create and how is that acceptable?


answer if you can, cocksmoker.

smarmy condescension is not an argument.
Click to expand...
Not sure why I'm bothering with a crazy person, but maybe someone else out there will get this.

The question of ‘how many layoffs are acceptable’ completely ignores the real stakes: we have to stay the absolute king of AI, period, no matter how many jobs get torched or how much society cries about it short-term. I'm not saying financial ruin will happen at all, but let's pretend AI will cause a lot of pain.

We either adapt fast, retrain, switch careers, invent new shit, or we accept a lower standard of living and watch our dominance slip away. If the sky-is-falling crowd is right and mass layoffs hit, that’s still a thousand times better than waking up one day forced to learn Mandarin because we lost the race.

Any adult not lost in delusion knows the AI cat’s out of the bag. We either lead in building it and unleashing it or we get left in the dust. The only proven way to stay ahead of China is to let the free market do its thing: rewarding innovation, speed, and risk-taking. It's called the American way.

China can’t beat us unless we handcuff ourselves with their playbook, top-down government control, zero real incentives, bureaucrats picking winners and strong government regulations. Command economies always choke and die in long races. History’s full of their corpses.

So yeah, we charge hard and adapt like grown-ups, or we fall behind and pay a price that makes a few pink slips look like a rounding error. There's no room for alarmist and paranoid crack addicts. Lead or bleed. That's reality, we don't get to bend it to our scared and ignorant will. We must boldly go where no man has gone before. (where have I heard that?)

Now, I'll be called an evil AI pig and a globalist swine or some variation. It's what dipshit calls an argument.
 
Tobytone said:
Not sure why I'm bothering with a crazy person, but maybe someone else out there will get this.

The question of ‘how many layoffs are acceptable’ completely ignores the real stakes: we have to stay the absolute king of AI, period, no matter how many jobs get torched or how much society cries about it short-term. I'm not saying financial ruin will happen at all, but let's pretend AI will cause a lot of pain.

We either adapt fast, retrain, switch careers, invent new shit, or we accept a lower standard of living and watch our dominance slip away. If the sky-is-falling crowd is right and mass layoffs hit, that’s still a thousand times better than waking up one day forced to learn Mandarin because we lost the race.

Any adult not lost in delusion knows the AI cat’s out of the bag. We either lead in building it and unleashing it or we get left in the dust. The only proven way to stay ahead of China is to let the free market do its thing: rewarding innovation, speed, and risk-taking. It's called the American way.

China can’t beat us unless we handcuff ourselves with their playbook, top-down government control, zero real incentives, bureaucrats picking winners and strong government regulations. Command economies always choke and die in long races. History’s full of their corpses.

So yeah, we charge hard and adapt like grown-ups, or we fall behind and pay a price that makes a few pink slips look like a rounding error. There's no room for alarmist and paranoid crack addicts. Lead or bleed. That's reality, we don't get to bend it to our scared and ignorant will. We must boldly go where no man has gone before. (where have I heard that?)

Now, I'll be called an evil AI pig and a globalist swine or some variation. It's what dipshit calls an argument.
Click to expand...
blah blah blah.

you're just a totalitarian anti-human dick eater, who protests too much.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top