Mueller was no hero
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
I used to wonder about this a lot. Should you avoid saying something true because it might upset people or give ammunition to your political opponents? Ultimately, I think it’s better to say these things, because the benefit of getting it all out in the open far outweighs the benefit of some artificial societal consensus about being “kind and nice,” especially when the left abandoned that consensus decades ago (even though they still claim to follow it).
If Trump hadn’t said anything, they’d still have found some reason to attack him, all while spinning lies about how wonderful Robert Mueller was, with no pushback, because apparently we’re not allowed to speak ill of the dead.
So yes, I’m glad Trump pulled back the curtain on the horrific evil done by Mueller and in his name, regardless of how many people get upset by it.
View: https://x.com/HansMahncke/status/2035461300340552090?s=20
If Trump hadn’t said anything, they’d still have found some reason to attack him, all while spinning lies about how wonderful Robert Mueller was, with no pushback, because apparently we’re not allowed to speak ill of the dead.
So yes, I’m glad Trump pulled back the curtain on the horrific evil done by Mueller and in his name, regardless of how many people get upset by it.
View: https://x.com/HansMahncke/status/2035461300340552090?s=20
The Mueller Special Counsel's Office brought two indictments that went into great detail about the supposed Russian "interference" in the 2016 election.Both were long "speaking indictments" laying out the allegations made by Mueller's handpicked prosecutors.
Those allegations were dutifully reported by the Democrats as "facts" -- something they continue to do to this day.
Mueller exposed those documents publicly, with all the names of Russian defendants there for everyone to see, guaranteeing that none of those people would 1) travel to the US or 2) travel to any country that might extradite them to the U.S.
They could have kept them sealed until they had an opportunity to arrest the named defendants, many of whom had lived in the U.S. at one time or another.
But instead Mueller grandstanded in press conferences where the leftist media treated the allegations as fact.
But then a strange thing happened.
One Russian company named in the indictments had a US law firm appear on its behalf.
With the law firm standing in as Corporate Representative (as is allowed by law) the Russian company pled "Not Guilty".
Mueller resisted having to prosecute the case on a variety of grounds, losing each time.
Mueller then closed up shop and handed their burning bag of dogshit to the U.S. Attorney for DC.
Within months, the U.S. Attorney dismissed the case.
This is the ENTIRETY of what Mueller "proved" about Russian "collusion" in the 2016 election .
Nothing.
Those allegations were dutifully reported by the Democrats as "facts" -- something they continue to do to this day.
Mueller exposed those documents publicly, with all the names of Russian defendants there for everyone to see, guaranteeing that none of those people would 1) travel to the US or 2) travel to any country that might extradite them to the U.S.
They could have kept them sealed until they had an opportunity to arrest the named defendants, many of whom had lived in the U.S. at one time or another.
But instead Mueller grandstanded in press conferences where the leftist media treated the allegations as fact.
But then a strange thing happened.
One Russian company named in the indictments had a US law firm appear on its behalf.
With the law firm standing in as Corporate Representative (as is allowed by law) the Russian company pled "Not Guilty".
Mueller resisted having to prosecute the case on a variety of grounds, losing each time.
Mueller then closed up shop and handed their burning bag of dogshit to the U.S. Attorney for DC.
Within months, the U.S. Attorney dismissed the case.
This is the ENTIRETY of what Mueller "proved" about Russian "collusion" in the 2016 election .
Nothing.
Nomad
Verified User
Yes, he was.
You and your MAGA ilk just don't understand the meaning of the word "hero".
To you imbeciles, a "hero" is a greedy, fat-assed old pervert con artist who victimizes people, including and especially the non-white, non-"Christian" people who you all despise.
Mueller was a hero and trump is a zero.
signalmankenneth
Verified User
Nomad
Verified User
And how did the media behave during the Clinton-Lewinski scandal?
How did they behave when the topic was Hillary's emails?
Did they sweep it under the rug?
Did they act like they didn't want to know about it?
Stop crying victim like the wussy you are, bitch-boy.
