The Constitution is clear about the mail in voting

Doesn't change what I stated. Mail-in elections and election seasons are a bad thing. Voting should be done on a single day, maybe over two consecutive ones at most. The idea of voting over most of a month or more is a bad thing in that it allows all candidates and their parties to campaign while voting is going on.

It's like letting juries watch the trial over a Zoom conference and vote at any point during it.

Your whole argument boils down to "We can't do it differently because we've always done it this way." It is not logical, it is not rational, and it is backed up by zero evidence of all the nonsense you claim about fraud. As for the silly idea that voting early while campaigns are still in progress is somehow "bad," most of us are thoroughly sick of campaigns that last a year or longer and have made up our minds long before election day. If the guy you voted for gets arrested for child pornography three days before the election, then you just voted for a pedophile. But we're used to that, too. Look at what's squatting in our White House.
 
The point is just because it isn't specifically in the Constitution doesn't make it unconstitutional. You went Truth Detector's routine.
I don't know what the big deal is.
IT IS in the Constitution , Art 2 clause 2 , I believe.
It says it is up to the states legislatures on how they want to appoint their delegates to the EC.
IF they want to have everybody that lives in the state vote no matter who they are they can. if they want to photo ID they can.
it is all up to them.
Heck the do NOT even need to hold elections the legislature can just appoint them, but again I am sure IF they did this they wouldn't have a job for long.

Electoral College
Clause 2. Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress; but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
 
Aren't they already legal? :dunno:
Are bazookas , howitzers and RPGs legal for private citizens to own?

Short answer: generally no for ordinary civilians
Bottom line
RPGs / bazookas: Essentially not legal in any practical, usable sense
  • Howitzers: Sometimes legal as collector items, but not as real weapons
  • Fully functional explosive weapon systems: Effectively prohibited for civilians
ChatGPT
 
Are bazookas , howitzers and RPGs legal for private citizens to own?

Short answer: generally no for ordinary civilians
Bottom line
RPGs / bazookas: Essentially not legal in any practical, usable sense
  • Howitzers: Sometimes legal as collector items, but not as real weapons
  • Fully functional explosive weapon systems: Effectively prohibited for civilians
ChatGPT
Odd as I got different answers.
 
Too bad what?

Yes, it is possible for a US citizen to own a bazooka (or similar rocket launchers), but they are heavily regulated as "Destructive Devices" under the National Firearms Act (NFA). Ownership requires federal registration with the ATF, a $200 tax stamp, extensive background checks, and compliance with state/local laws, which may ban them outright.
 
ef35d5b1e3c913cda634181d8498be43.jpg
The MAGA morons keep proving that is correct. Sad
 
Who's inconvenienced?
Ever notice how Lefty never defends her own stupid threads? She like every other drone can only post what others say, she has no idea how to defend her 'beliefs.' I seriously can't think of a single example of Lefty explaining her views, never, not once. The comment above is a prime example of the typical 'defense' of her stupid uninformed positions on any given subject. All any libtard has to offer is a never-ending parade of click-bait articles by those that learned long ago, there's money to be had in the libtard lunacy business. Just pointing out the obvious.
 
Too bad what?

Yes, it is possible for a US citizen to own a bazooka (or similar rocket launchers), but they are heavily regulated as "Destructive Devices" under the National Firearms Act (NFA). Ownership requires federal registration with the ATF, a $200 tax stamp, extensive background checks, and compliance with state/local laws, which may ban them outright.



  • Howitzers: Sometimes legal as collector items, but not as real weapons
  • Fully functional explosive weapon systems: Effectively prohibited for civilians
 
There were only muskets and rifles too. Point?
The point is they are MAGA morons who seek to shred the Constitution and replace our Republic with a White Nationalist autocracy. They are domestic enemies of the Constitution who seek to roll back the clock on voting rights. They are evil and should be treated as such.

 
  • Howitzers: Sometimes legal as collector items, but not as real weapons
  • Fully functional explosive weapon systems: Effectively prohibited for civilians
Privately owning a howitzer (artillery piece) is federally legal in the US but heavily regulated as a "Destructive Device" under the National Firearms Act (NFA). Owners must register the item with the ATF, pay a

tax, and pass background checks. Generally, this applies to functional, modern artillery, while muzzle-loading black powder cannons are often unrestricted.
 
If the Dems are cheating, why do the Repubs have the House, Senate, and presidency in close elections? That's not very good cheating, Sadly, rightys cannot understand our election are fair and honest. Because Trump lied about our elections, millions of people will lose their right to vote. There are casualties every place Trump goes.
Don't expect MAGA morons and anti-Americans to make sense. :)

These people are enemies of the Constitution. Remember their names. :flagsal:
 
Privately owning a howitzer (artillery piece) is federally legal in the US but heavily regulated as a "Destructive Device" under the National Firearms Act (NFA). Owners must register the item with the ATF, pay a

tax, and pass background checks. Generally, this applies to functional, modern artillery, while muzzle-loading black powder cannons are often unrestricted.
Are you saying you’re against any kind of gun control?
 
Back
Top