Into the Night
Contributor
Mantra 1a. Lame. Argument from randU fallacy.To be able to have a thought / think you need to have a brain and INTO doesn't have one, if he does he only has an IQ of a MORON IF it is even that high.
Mantra 1a. Lame. Argument from randU fallacy.To be able to have a thought / think you need to have a brain and INTO doesn't have one, if he does he only has an IQ of a MORON IF it is even that high.
Lie. Denial. Such a compact is unconstitutional. See Articles I and II and the constitutions of the various States, all of which you discard.Solely by agreement of the states. Nothing concerning the Constitution.
Shut up you braindead troll.Lie. Denial. Such a compact is unconstitutional. See Article I.
Lie. Denial. Every State is gets a say in choosing the President and Vice-President, Hugo.No empirical evidence shows large or small states receive any benefit or loss by electoral college.
Non-sequitur fallacy.Because it would mean there will never be a republican president again.
It is not arbitrary, Hugo. It gives voice to every single State on choosing the President and Vice-President. I already know you discard the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.Not really. I think the EC is arbitrary.
YARP. Inversion fallacy.Of course you did, you hit your limit and defaulted to the only sound your brain can still make. Fallacy fallacy. Inversion fallacy. You’re not even pretending to think anymore. You’re just spitting out labels like a broken Pez dispenser that only ever had two candies to begin with.
Buzzword.troll
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.As usual, your inane comments require no thoughtful reply.
It's representative government versus the individual voter.Put another way, it's representative government versus the mob--usually an angry mob.
As if that is of the slightest relevance.No empirical evidence shows large or small states receive any benefit or loss by electoral college.
And as usual you don't disappointAs usual, your inane comments require no thoughtful reply.
bye trollAnd as usual you don't disappoint
You copied that from somewhere. Cite the source. Did not read itAs if that is of the slightest relevance.
As a price for their approval of The Constitution, states demanded more representation in the national government than population alone would have given them. The result was a House based on population, a Senate with equal representation and an Electoral College having the same number of members as a state's total votes in Congress. The compromise not only helped secure votes of the smaller states at the Constitutional Convention but helped secure them again in the state ratifying conventions that followed. This is basic Constitutional history not "a common belief not borne out by the evidence".
You are surprised that the GOP doesn't want to violate the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions like you do?
The Constitution needs to be amended so "the people elect the President."Ah, yet another strawman.
As for the Constitution, it can be changed, and frequently is, according to whatever fashion strikes the fancy of the SC judges, right or left wing, so you ideologues and fantasists have no room for sniveling.
The Constitution needs to be amended so "the people elect the President."
Sober up. You comment was incoherent.Illegal aliens aren't "The People', and neither are commies and deviant sociopaths.,
Sober up. You comment was incoherent.