34,000 DEAD PEOPLE Were Registered to Vote in North Carolina

That means the government is notified following a person's death. Long past time to connect the voter rolls to death notices.
Some rather idiotic assumptions on your part.
1. You assume the SSA is told about every death. They aren't.
2. You assume the SSA shares information. For the most part they don't and legally can't.
3. You assume the SSA lists the death instantaneously in their records. All notifications are not added immediately. It can take weeks for it to happen since SSA requires a certified death certificate.
4. You assume that election rolls are updated daily. They aren't. Most are updated monthly or even more time between updates. That means it can easily take two or more months for the names of dead people to be removed even if SSA has the information and passes it on.

Long past time for you to get out of your cult and join the real world.
 
But sure, election integrity is a 'Conspiracy Theory'
But don't worry--every Democrat with a microphone says that concerns about voter roll accuracy are
just right-wing paranoia.
Nothing to see here, for those 34,000 corpse are just exercising their constitutional rights from beyond the grave.
Just remember, if the Democrats had managed to pass the Fuck the Voters Act (For the Voters act), N. Carolina couldn't remove these people from its rolls.
 
That means the government is notified following a person's death. Long past time to connect the voter rolls to death notices.

Okay, fine.

But that's no reason to turn the situation into a big lib'rul conspiracy to cheat during elections.

Those two things have no connection whatsoever and the cheating part is non-existent anyway.
 
Many if not all of those registered dead voters simply got their relatives (or whoever had access to their mail) to keep sending in their mail-in voting ballots. Of course, 100% of those mail-in ballots of dead people will be voting for the democrat on the ticket. We need to fully stop mail-in voting as it is so disgustingly dishonest. We also need to stop this late voting where thousands of ballots end up being recorded a week or longer after the initial voting date. And of course all of those late dishonest votes end up going to the democrat on the ticket.
You are making that up. Why can't you be honest?
Explain why the dead people would vote Democrat. You make shit up to pretend the Reds are being victimized. Fact is some people used the mail-in ballots of their recently dead spouse to vote. There were not many, but almost all were votes for Trump. You make no sense, as usual.
 
Yea, like ad hominem and insults are a valid response...
Good point. Too bad you don't practice what you preach.
Just remember, if the Democrats had managed to pass the Fuck the Voters Act (For the Voters act), N. Carolina couldn't remove these people from its rolls.
You might be taken more seriously if you actually stuck to facts instead of preposterous name calling and lack of facts.

For instance, could you point to where any legislation proposed by Democrats said that dead people had to keep their voter registration? You made the claim so it incumbent upon you to back up your claim while ignoring your insults you included for no reason other than to provide insults.
 
Many if not all of those registered dead voters simply got their relatives (or whoever had access to their mail) to keep sending in their mail-in voting ballots. Of course, 100% of those mail-in ballots of dead people will be voting for the democrat on the ticket. We need to fully stop mail-in voting as it is so disgustingly dishonest. We also need to stop this late voting where thousands of ballots end up being recorded a week or longer after the initial voting date. And of course all of those late dishonest votes end up going to the democrat on the ticket.
That is simply not true and absurd enough to be thought of as insane. You should not make up so much crap.
 
For instance, could you point to where any legislation proposed by Democrats said that dead people had to keep their voter registration? You made the claim so it incumbent upon you to back up your claim while ignoring your insults you included for no reason other than to provide insults.
I'd start with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 that was written by Democrats, heavily supported by Democrats, and signed into law by a Democrat.

It makes purging voters from existing rolls very difficult to do.
 
It is ad hominem or insults. You included no rebuttal whatsoever. You simply insulted and attacked me instead.

I was not even referring to you personally.

Go back and read it again.

Try to concentrate this time.

Otherwise, your same old...

1000091921.jpg

....is getting tiresome.

Especially in light of the fact that you often do the same thing you're wetting in yourself over.
 
I'd start with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 that was written by Democrats, heavily supported by Democrats, and signed into law by a Democrat.

It makes purging voters from existing rolls very difficult to do.
Would you care to point to the specific part of that act that prevents dead people from being removed from the voter registration list? Or are you just going to ignore the fact that you can't support your claim?

Hint- The act you just mentioned at no time prevents removing dead people from the voter registration list. In fact it requires a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters by reason of—(A) the death of the registrant;
It seems once again, your source says the exact opposite of what you claim it said.
 
Back
Top