A question for Democrats and Republicans:

Uncensored is the only guy who could type IQ 35 and you know his is much lower. His posts hit the thread like pop‑ups, annoying, repetitive, and nobody remembers what they said once they’re gone.
I wonder why Uncivilized (@Uncensored2008 ) is stuck on the IQ measurement, "35"?

Perhaps that's the quotient the poor trumptard hopes to aspire to someday?
 
I wonder why Uncivilized (@Uncensored2008 ) is stuck on the IQ measurement, "35"?

Perhaps that's the quotient the poor trumptard hopes to aspire to someday?

Poor leech - falling into the "severely retarded" category has been hard on you.

Ted Cassidy lived in Covina when I was a teen. I used to run into him at the Taco Bell on Citrus. He was a really nice man, was very educated and intelligent.

You're nothing like him. Nothing at all like him.
 
Poor leech - falling into the "severely retarded" category has been hard on you.

Ted Cassidy lived in Covina when I was a teen. I used to run into him at the Taco Bell on Citrus. He was a really nice man, was very educated and intelligent.

You're nothing like him. Nothing at all like him.
Sparky - you have to know that based on your perverted view of the world and constant outright lying that any insult from you is actually a compliment.

Your words could not mean less to me.
 
Sparky - you have to know that based on your perverted view of the world and constant outright lying that any insult from you is actually a compliment.

Your words could not mean less to me.

Leech, you degrade the man whos' character you use. You're a scumbag, and the actor who played Lurch was a decent man- nothing at all like you.

You should change your name and avatar to something like "Pigshit" to accurately descrive who and what you are.
 
Leech, you degrade the man whos' character you use. You're a scumbag, and the actor who played Lurch was a decent man- nothing at all like you.

You should change your name and avatar to something like "Pigshit" to accurately descrive who and what you are.
If you would go back and study the last sentence of post #145 - that should be helpful to you. Just try to sound the words out slowly dimwit, you should get through it ok.
 
That's what you get for thinking. You don't do it very well, and probably should stop entirely.

Clearly we agree that healthcare costs and the cost of health insurance is far too high. What do you suggest to bring costs down? More government involvement has now repeatedly been shown to increase those costs, not lower them. So, what would you propose?
That was stupid. Other countries have better care at less than half our price. They have been our labs. This is not fantasy, but fact. Our healthcare system shows that owners and investors will squeeze every dime out of healthcare by higher prices and cutting services. For p[ofit healthcare guaranties] the highest prices and the least service delivery they can get away with. The bug in our system is the health insurance industry. They have no product, They do not do healthcare and they come between a person who needs care and the hospital. Two trillion dollars plus is the money we waste on health insurance,
 
That was stupid. Other countries have better care at less than half our price. They have been our labs. This is not fantasy, but fact. Our healthcare system shows that owners and investors will squeeze every dime out of healthcare by higher prices and cutting services. For p[ofit healthcare guaranties] the highest prices and the least service delivery they can get away with. The bug in our system is the health insurance industry. They have no product, They do not do healthcare and they come between a person who needs care and the hospital. Two trillion dollars plus is the money we waste on health insurance,
Absolutely on the button.

The Right just does not get it.
 
Facts prove exact opposite.

The fact is that health insurance has blossomed from an average of $480 a month in 2008 to over $2,500 a month in 2026. That is a rise of over 500% due to Obama's fascist care scheme.


Hey, but Kaiser, Humana, and Blue Cross have profits beyond their wildest dreams. And of course the donate HEAVILY to the democrat party, with lots of special bonuses for the Pelosi's and Obama's involved.
 
The fact is that health insurance has blossomed from an average of $480 a month in 2008 to over $2,500 a month in 2026. That is a rise of over 500% due to Obama's fascist care scheme.


Hey, but Kaiser, Humana, and Blue Cross have profits beyond their wildest dreams. And of course the donate HEAVILY to the democrat party, with lots of special bonuses for the Pelosi's and Obama's involved.

1. “Health insurance averaged $480/mo in 2008.”

❌ False.
Authoritative data from the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) shows:
  • 2008 average employer‑sponsored family premium: $12,680/year$1,056/month
  • 2008 average employer‑sponsored single premium: $4,704/year$392/month
So the closest real number is $392/mo, not $480.
Source: KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey (2008)

2. “Health insurance is $2,500/mo in 2026.”

❌ Not supported by any major dataset.
The most recent authoritative numbers (2023–2025):
  • 2023 employer family premium: $23,968/year → $1,997/mo
  • 2023 employer single premium: $8,435/year → $703/mo
Even with 2024–2025 inflation, no credible source places the average premium at $2,500/mo.
The site linked (consumershield.com) is not a primary data source. It aggregates marketing content and does not publish raw actuarial data.
Sources:
  • KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey (2023)
  • CMS National Health Expenditure Data

3. “Premiums rose 500% because of Obamacare.”

❌ Mathematically false.
Let’s use the real numbers:

Single coverage

2008: $392/mo 2023: $703/mo Increase: ~80%, not 500%.

Family coverage

2008: $1,056/mo 2023: $1,997/mo Increase: ~89%, not 500%.
Even if you cherry‑pick the highest individual‑market premiums in certain states, you cannot reach a 500% national increase.
Sources:
  • KFF (2008–2023)
  • CMS (ACA marketplace data)

4. “Obamacare caused all the increases.”

❌ Oversimplified and contradicted by data.
Premium growth has been driven by:
  • Rising hospital prices
  • Rising prescription drug costs
  • Consolidation in provider markets
  • Increased chronic disease burden
  • Insurer administrative costs
  • Employer plan design changes
Premiums were rising long before the ACA:
  • 1999–2008: premiums rose ~119%
  • 2008–2023: premiums rose ~80–90%
The ACA slowed the rate of employer‑sponsored premium growth compared to the 1999–2008 period.
Sources:
  • KFF Long‑Term Premium Trends
  • Health Affairs, “Trends in Employer Premium Growth”

5. “Kaiser, Humana, Blue Cross have profits beyond their wildest dreams.”

❌ Misleading.
Health insurer profit margins are low compared to other industries:
  • Typical net margins: 3–6%
  • Hospitals: 8–12%
  • Pharma: 15–20%
The ACA actually capped insurer profits via the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rule:
  • Insurers must spend 80–85% of premiums on medical care
  • Excess must be rebated to consumers
Billions have been refunded since 2012.
Sources:
  • NAIC (National Association of Insurance Commissioners)
  • CMS MLR Reports

6. “They donate heavily to Democrats, with bonuses to Pelosi and Obama.”

❌ Unsupported conspiracy claim.
Actual donation patterns:
  • Health insurers donate to both parties, usually leaning Republican in most cycles.
  • No evidence exists of “special bonuses” to Pelosi or Obama.
  • Campaign finance is publicly searchable via FEC.gov.
For example:
  • In 2020, health insurance PACs gave ~54% to Republicans, ~46% to Democrats.
  • In 2022, the split was similar.
Sources:
  • FEC.gov
  • OpenSecrets.org (Health Insurance Industry Profile)

7. Summary Table

ClaimVerdictEvidence
$480/mo in 2008❌ FalseKFF shows $392/mo (single)
$2,500/mo in 2026❌ UnsupportedNo major dataset shows this
500% increase❌ Math is wrongReal increase ~80–90%
Obamacare caused all increases❌ IncorrectPremiums rose faster pre‑ACA
Insurers have massive profits❌ MisleadingMargins 3–6%, MLR caps profits
Insurers donate heavily to Democrats❌ FalseDonations split, often GOP‑leaning
“Bonuses” to Pelosi/Obama❌ No evidenceNot supported by FEC records
 
Back
Top