I guess on one hand you have to hand it to marxists. They never give up

Buzzword fallacy (fact check). Go learn what 'fact' means.
Mandani is a communist.

He wants to open a government run grocery store.
He wants to give away stuff for free, paid for by taking money from someone else.
He wants government run insurance.



Poor Zombie, still trying to use AI for his brain. :blah:

✅ FACT CHECK (with sources)​

Intothenight’s claim that “Mamdani is a communist” is false according to every authoritative source available.

What the evidence shows​

  • Multiple fact‑checks (PolitiFact, Al Jazeera) state clearly that Mamdani is not a communist. He identifies as a democratic socialist, which is not the same thing.
  • Experts note that communism requires things Mamdani does not advocate:
    • abolition of private property
    • government takeover of industry
    • centrally planned economy
    • one‑party ruleNone of these appear in his platform.
  • His proposals — fare‑free transit, city‑owned grocery stores, social housing, single‑payer healthcare — are standard democratic‑socialist / social‑democratic policies, not communist doctrine.
  • Factually.co also confirms he is a democratic socialist, not a communist.

Bottom line​

Calling Mamdani a communist is a political smear, not a factual description.
 

So after being thwarted by the courts because of their illegal ballot initiative in Virginia, the democrats have a new plan to get their redistricting ways.

They plan on changing the current retirement age of their judges to 54 so they can replace all of them with those that will give them their way.

Now technically, this is legal, but the optics aren't good. But, when do these marxists care about optics?

I must say it is funny to watch. I doubt any JPP marxist will come out in opposition to this move because they all march in lock step even though they claim to be "independent" thinkers.

About the only response I will get from them is complaints about being called marxists.
FDR did it first!
 
calling my reply AI slop doesn’t hide the fact that you’ve been recycling the same three insults for so long they’ve got expiration dates. And Zombie isn’t a comeback, it’s just you admitting you can’t keep up with an argument.
You can't blame your fallacies on anybody else, Zombie. You are presenting any arguments.
 

FACT CHECK (with sources)​

No such thing. Go learn what 'fact' means, Zombie.
Intothenight’s claim that “Mamdani is a communist” is false according to every authoritative source available.
Lie. Denial. Go read the writings of Karl Marx. This is what Mandani follows. He is a communist.
Communism is government ownership of markets. Mandani is a communist.

...deleted remaining AI slop...​

AI not not usable as a brain, Zombie.
 
No such thing. Go learn what 'fact' means, Zombie.

Lie. Denial. Go read the writings of Karl Marx. This is what Mandani follows. He is a communist.
Communism is government ownership of markets. Mandani is a communist.


AI not not usable as a brain, Zombie.
Authoritative sources confirm Intothenight’s claim is false. Mahmood Mamdani is not a communist — he’s a Ugandan academic and political theorist known for his work on colonialism, race, and identity in Africa. His scholarship draws from post‑colonial and critical theory, not Marxist economic doctrine.

🔍 Verified Sources​

  • Columbia University Faculty Bio: Mamdani is a professor of Government and Anthropology, specializing in African studies and political violence. No mention of communist affiliation or advocacy.
  • Books: Citizen and Subject (1996), Good Muslim, Bad Muslim (2004), Neither Settler nor Native (2020) — all analyze power and identity, not promote state ownership of markets.
  • Academic Reviews: Journals like African Affairs and Political Theory describe his work as post‑colonial and critical, not Marxist or communist.

⚖️ Summary​

Calling Mamdani a communist because he critiques imperialism is like calling a historian of Rome a Caesar loyalist. It’s a category error — and a lazy one.
 
I don't waste time with AI slop.

AI is a useful tool, but it is not God. It is not a Holy Oracle. It is usually not even correct.
Don't worship AI, Libby.
AI slop? No, Intothenight, that’s just what you call anything that exposes you.

You didn’t reject AI. You rejected being proven wrong. The moment facts entered the room, you folded like wet cardboard and hid behind the same two insults you’ve been recycling since the Bush administration.

AI isn’t God? Relax. Nobody needs divine power to out‑argue you, basic literacy is enough.

You’re not above the conversation. You’re not critiquing technology. You’re just terrified of anything that doesn’t let you move the goalposts.
 
Teflon, until you stop calling people by an archaic, basically non-existent name like Marxists, you can just ride your short bus off into the sunset. I'm torn on thinking if you're just old as dirt or young and brainwashed.
 
Teflon, until you stop calling people by an archaic, basically non-existent name like Marxists, you can just ride your short bus off into the sunset. I'm torn on thinking if you're just old as dirt or young and brainwashed.
For some posters, Marxist is the only political insult they know. It’s Cold War cosplay, they’re fighting ghosts because real arguments require effort.
 
AI won't work for your brain, Zombie.
Of course you deleted your goblin picture. Nothing terrifies a man like seeing his behavior drawn accurately.

And that ...delete AI slop… line? That wasn’t confidence. That was panic‑sweat in text form.

You didn’t delete the image because it was slop. You deleted it because:

  • It hit too close to home
  • It exposed your one‑note behavior
  • It showed everyone exactly how you argue
Then you tried to save face with AI won’t work for your brain, Zombie.

That’s not a comeback. That’s a man trying to sweep up the pieces of his ego with a broken broom.

You can’t refute the facts. You can’t handle the caricature. So you pretend the medium is the problem, not the mirror it held up.

You didn’t delete AI slop. You deleted evidence of your own personality glitch.
 
Authoritative sources confirm Intothenight’s claim is false. Mahmood Mamdani is not a communist — he’s a Ugandan academic and political theorist known for his work on colonialism, race, and identity in Africa. His scholarship draws from post‑colonial and critical theory, not Marxist economic doctrine.

🔍 Verified Sources​

  • Columbia University Faculty Bio: Mamdani is a professor of Government and Anthropology, specializing in African studies and political violence. No mention of communist affiliation or advocacy.
  • Books: Citizen and Subject (1996), Good Muslim, Bad Muslim (2004), Neither Settler nor Native (2020) — all analyze power and identity, not promote state ownership of markets.
  • Academic Reviews: Journals like African Affairs and Political Theory describe his work as post‑colonial and critical, not Marxist or communist.

⚖️ Summary​

Calling Mamdani a communist because he critiques imperialism is like calling a historian of Rome a Caesar loyalist. It’s a category error — and a lazy one.
Sounds like Claude (AI), steeped in heavy handed attempts to protect leftist Academia, this AI refuses to see the Marxist influence in post-colonial theory. True, Mamdani doesn't wave a little red book around, but it doesn't change that calling him a 'communist' may be imprecise but it is not crazy given the intellectual lineage and his son's politics.

And "authoritative sources" is a cop out.
 
Back
Top