Omar getting in deeper
- Thread starter T. A. Gardner
- Start date
That simply is not true. Your own links tell us that is a lie.
Not a single Democrat voted for it, so you are lying about Democrats voting for it. The DFL is the Democratic Party in Minnesota, there is no other party Democratic Party. Out of the eight person committee, 5 are Republicans, and 3 are Democrats/DFL.
Again, your own links say that not a single Democrat supported this.
Links that said you were lying. Do better.
"Any day now"?
Yep. "Kamala, er I mean the OLD HO's GOT THIS " ?
Did the CIA steal your evidence again?Yep. "Kamala, er I mean the OLD HO's GOT THIS " ?
So, let me see if I've got this correct. If you do your research in a particular way...ANYBODY RESPONDING TO YOU MUST USE THE SAME METHOD???
Is that one of the rules of this forum...or did you just pull that out of your ass, TA?
C'mon, Man.
So are you. YOU are "tied" to convicted fraudsters...right here in this thread. You are posting about them...and making accusations.Omar is tied to convicted fraudsters.
Minnesota Democratic lawmakers received over $50K in campaign cash from Feeding Our Future fraudsters
Minnesota Democrats raked in tens of thousands in campaign cash from fraudsters in biggest pandemic fraud in USnypost.com
Somali fugitive fleeing Minnesota fraud charges is an Ilhan Omar donor
A Somali fraudster-turned-fugitive accused of stealing $11 million from Minnesota’s Medicaid program previously donated to Rep. Illhan Omar (D-MN).www.washingtonexaminer.com
Omar is facing POTENTIAL fraud charges here.
Trump uses justice to make people he does not like look bad. He has taken lots of people to court and the cases are thrown out. Trump has politicized justice just like no president ever. Unlike rightys, I wait to see what develops from acts like this,Ilhan Omar looks like she's getting in deeper and deeper shit with alleged fraud. Minnesota subpoenaed her to turn over her congressional e-mails related to several Somali fraudsters who have now been convicted. She's known to have had more than a passing relation with them and the e-mails are public records. Yet, Omar won't fork them over.
Minnesota is now asking Congress to act for them and force the turnover of the records. If that happens and Omar refuses, she would be potentially looking at federal felony charges.
There must be some really bad shit in those e-mails for her to want to chance going to prison for not cooperating with a state and federal criminal investigation where she is known to have had regular relations with now convicted felons that were involved in the fraud.
Exclusive | Minnesota GOP state lawmaker pushes House Oversight panel to subpoena Rep. Ilhan Omar
The proposed subpoena requests communications from her ex-campaign staffer Guhaad Hashi Said, who pled guilty to defrauding taxpayers.
Minnesota lawmakers fail at trying to get Omar to testify about alleged fraud, GOP leader talks next steps
Minnesota committee chair says more options exist after a subpoena vote targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar over the MEALS Act fraud scandal failed Tuesday.www.foxnews.com
Interestingly, in the Minnesota house, the committee issuing those subpoenas had Republican and Democrat support but the radical Leftist DFL, who is actually the party Omar is in, voted against it 100% (3 votes).
You do know that this is all the assertions of one Republican State Legislator? She is on the Committee capable of issuing subpoenas and the Committee rejected the request.Ilhan Omar looks like she's getting in deeper and deeper shit with alleged fraud. Minnesota subpoenaed her to turn over her congressional e-mails related to several Somali fraudsters who have now been convicted. She's known to have had more than a passing relation with them and the e-mails are public records. Yet, Omar won't fork them over.
Minnesota is now asking Congress to act for them and force the turnover of the records. If that happens and Omar refuses, she would be potentially looking at federal felony charges.
There must be some really bad shit in those e-mails for her to want to chance going to prison for not cooperating with a state and federal criminal investigation where she is known to have had regular relations with now convicted felons that were involved in the fraud.
Exclusive | Minnesota GOP state lawmaker pushes House Oversight panel to subpoena Rep. Ilhan Omar
The proposed subpoena requests communications from her ex-campaign staffer Guhaad Hashi Said, who pled guilty to defrauding taxpayers.
Minnesota lawmakers fail at trying to get Omar to testify about alleged fraud, GOP leader talks next steps
Minnesota committee chair says more options exist after a subpoena vote targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar over the MEALS Act fraud scandal failed Tuesday.
Interestingly, in the Minnesota house, the committee issuing those subpoenas had Republican and Democrat support but the radical Leftist DFL, who is actually the party Omar is in, voted against it 100% (3 votes).
Murdoch (Fox and NYP are Murdoch, always got a kick how one endorses a story in the other like that are separate entities) is echoing the women’s alleges as of they were established facts.
Screaming fraud is one of MaraLago’s campaign themes this year, deep state and drain the swamp both hit the point of diminishing returns, so it is no surprise the women is echoing the dog whistles
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Using AI as a single source is not the way to do research. That's what Grimmy is doing, and now several other Leftists here are following her lead. Google AI is one source, and not a very good one. It'd be like relying solely on Wikipedia for information.
QP!
Verified User
Using AI as a single source that AGGRAGATES info from many sources, which is what it does, is absolutely a good way to do research.
Using wikipedia is fine too.
The key is you must check the citations.
Posting from a single web stie article as you do Terry is WORSE and the fact you rarely read what you post and get it wrong makes it even wrose.
There is nothing you can do better, NOTHING, by going to the website you did to pull that information that Ai, pulling that article plus 10 more would not do better.
You hate AI as you want to cherry pick one article you think BEST makes your point, while you still do not read it and get it wrong and AI, citing multiple sources will never support you.
QP!
Verified User
To address the stupidity of @T. A. Gardner and other magats complaint re AI you need look no further than what Terry posted above.
Have Terry explain how searching for (not using Google or AI as he says is wrong to do) the two web site articles he posted above to support his view is any better than using AI to get those two article plus 3 or 4 more to then support your view.
AI is simply an aggregator of information and as long as you can back it up with the citations then Terry can make no argument why going to one site and pulling info is better than using AI to examine 5 sites.
The reason Terry hates Ai is because he wants to cherry pick and only post one article and he hates how AI instantly aggregates 6 that PROVE him wrong and stupid.
Using AI and Google to inform your view and aggregate material for you, instead of searching for it without, is the best way to do research.
Have Terry explain how searching for (not using Google or AI as he says is wrong to do) the two web site articles he posted above to support his view is any better than using AI to get those two article plus 3 or 4 more to then support your view.
AI is simply an aggregator of information and as long as you can back it up with the citations then Terry can make no argument why going to one site and pulling info is better than using AI to examine 5 sites.
The reason Terry hates Ai is because he wants to cherry pick and only post one article and he hates how AI instantly aggregates 6 that PROVE him wrong and stupid.
Using AI and Google to inform your view and aggregate material for you, instead of searching for it without, is the best way to do research.
QP!
Verified User
You are forgetting the First Principle.tic tic tic tic.............
Magats are stupid and thus CANNOT convict anyone.
Despite magats screaming of obvious and clear crimes by Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Joe Biden, COmey and Letisha James, and them doing non stop Congressional and Special Prosecutor investigations where they claim 'this is it', they fail in laughable ways showing the world how stupid they are.
Meanwhile i can run a few pages of investigations, indictments and law licenses lost by Trump, his campaign staff and his Presidential administration. I could add pages more with the other prior Republican POTUS staff.
so rule #1 is - WE WIN BECAUSE THEY ARE STUPID!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Explain how posting up a Google AI answer verbatim that runs a page or more in length is something you thought through. AI is NOT just an aggregator. It is proven that AI is often, usually, biased based on the views of those programming it.
I pick sources and make MY OWN argument. Pasting up the Google AI answer is really for all intents, plagiarism. There is no original content in it from the poster. Any answer I give is to Google AI, not the poster as the latter put in no input.
QP!
Verified User
Explain how you posting the large two articles in the OP and commenting on them is thought through?
You seem to think the less info someone is given to form an opinion the better their opinion is.
So the person with 20 articles (Ai) as sources to form their view is less informed than the person with 2 sources (you), is less informed than the person who does not use the internet at all and only uses a newspaper and is less informed than a person who goes to the library.
Your entire thesis is upside down and stupid.
Having access to google prior, and AI now, when someone is trying to challenge and inform and support their view is by FAR the best way to do it.
But you do not believe that. What you hate is how point for point AI summaries, with citations can address each and every point you make and debunk them in an instant where if you had one person pulling an article as you do and you both debated you could do the 'no i am right... no i am' thing without end.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Where? Who?
QP!
Verified User
because you lie and distort about the articles which is pointed out almost every time you do it.
If a question is asked (example : how many US Potus have been considered Center or center left) and you tell me i am wrong in the way i am identifying one and i post this as the explainer of my view THERE IS NOTHING WRONG IN DOING THAT AND IT IS NOT SUPERIOR for me to instead try and do it off the top of my head.
--------
Determining the exact number of US Presidents considered "center" or "center-left" is subjective, as ideological definitions change over time and vary by political observer. However, based on political analyses and historical reviews, a significant portion of 20th and 21st-century presidents have occupied this space. [1, 2]
- Center-Left Presidents: Often include modern Democrats who operate within a market economy while supporting a social safety net, such as Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden.
- Centrist/Moderate Presidents: Often cited examples include Dwight D. Eisenhower (who could have been nominated by either party), John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, and Gerald Ford.
- Shifting Ideology: Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson are sometimes identified as early 20th-century progressives, but are considered left-leaning by some analyses.
- Pre-Party Era: George Washington is often considered a centrist by default because he was non-partisan. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
But go ahead explain why me answering without using that is superior... if you can?
Because they are representing it as their original work and not offering as AI with citations.
Same if you copied from an encyclopedia without citing.
She needs to be stripped of everything she owns and deported. The sooner the better. These people are so arrogant they can't imagine a world in which they get unwanted scrutiny, they truly believe they're untouchable. Because of this arrogance, they often say way too much in emails and then they actually believe hitting delete will do the trick, lol. Stupid is as stupid does. One thing I certain of? Steven Miller won't just let her slide, she's rightly on his radar and will stay there until she's gone. She's a deported woman walking.Ilhan Omar looks like she's getting in deeper and deeper shit with alleged fraud. Minnesota subpoenaed her to turn over her congressional e-mails related to several Somali fraudsters who have now been convicted. She's known to have had more than a passing relation with them and the e-mails are public records. Yet, Omar won't fork them over.
Minnesota is now asking Congress to act for them and force the turnover of the records. If that happens and Omar refuses, she would be potentially looking at federal felony charges.
There must be some really bad shit in those e-mails for her to want to chance going to prison for not cooperating with a state and federal criminal investigation where she is known to have had regular relations with now convicted felons that were involved in the fraud.
Exclusive | Minnesota GOP state lawmaker pushes House Oversight panel to subpoena Rep. Ilhan Omar
The proposed subpoena requests communications from her ex-campaign staffer Guhaad Hashi Said, who pled guilty to defrauding taxpayers.
Minnesota lawmakers fail at trying to get Omar to testify about alleged fraud, GOP leader talks next steps
Minnesota committee chair says more options exist after a subpoena vote targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar over the MEALS Act fraud scandal failed Tuesday.
Interestingly, in the Minnesota house, the committee issuing those subpoenas had Republican and Democrat support but the radical Leftist DFL, who is actually the party Omar is in, voted against it 100% (3 votes).
This portion of my comment if for all the libtards confused about my many comments about the difference between using articles and AI as source material and doing nothing but posting click-bait articles as your 'argument' like it's an article swap site or literally feeding everyone's comment into AI and then pasting the chatbots response as your own, like Grimy Pecker does.
This post is exactly how it's done. He uses his very own intelligence to express HIS thoughts and reasons for his conclusions and or opinions based on verifiable facts and gives you some of his sources for you to scrutinize till your hearts content. It's how debate sites work in the absence of countless morons acting like toddlers while posting click-bait as if it represents your 'thoughts.' and wins an argument. It doesn't, it proves you have no thoughts. That's why I call you drones. It's not really an insult it's an accurate descriptor. I hope this helps and clears things up.