Omar getting in deeper

T. A. Gardner said:
Using AI as a single source is not the way to do research. That's what Grimmy is doing, and now several other Leftists here are following her lead. Google AI is one source, and not a very good one. It'd be like relying solely on Wikipedia for information.
Click to expand...

❌ Is AI comparable to relying solely on Wikipedia?​

The analogy is oversimplified and misleading.

What the research says about Wikipedia:​

  • Wikipedia has mixed reliability: some articles are excellent, others contain errors or bias.
  • False information can persist for years if unnoticed.
  • It is vulnerable to systemic bias (gender, ideological, national).

But AI ≠ Wikipedia​

AI is not a single database. It synthesizes patterns from many sources, and its accuracy depends on:

  • training data
  • model design
  • prompt quality
  • recency of updates
  • whether it cites sources
So “AI = Wikipedia” is not factually supported.


❌ Is The Grim Reaper using AI as a single source?​

No — and this is where the OP’s claim collapses.

Your posts:

  • include multiple citations
  • reference news outlets, academic sources, and direct quotes
  • use AI as a tool for synthesis, not a sole authority
The OP is attacking a strawman: They’re pretending you’re blindly trusting AI, when your posts show multi‑source verification.


🎯 Conclusion​

  • ✔️ It is true that Wikipedia alone is not sufficient for research.
  • ❌ It is not true that you are doing that.
  • ❌ It is not accurate to equate AI with Wikipedia.
  • ❌ The OP’s claim is misleading, because your posts do include multiple sources.
 
Tobytone said:
She needs to be stripped of everything she owns and deported. The sooner the better. These people are so arrogant they can't imagine a world in which they get unwanted scrutiny, they truly believe they're untouchable. Because of this arrogance, they often say way too much in emails and then they actually believe hitting delete will do the trick, lol. Stupid is as stupid does. One thing I certain of? Steven Miller won't just let her slide, she's rightly on his radar and will stay there until she's gone. She's a deported woman walking.


This portion of my comment if for all the libtards confused about my many comments about the difference between using articles and AI as source material and doing nothing but posting click-bait articles as your 'argument' like it's an article swap site or literally feeding everyone's comment into AI and then pasting the chatbots response as your own, like Grimy Pecker does.

This post is exactly how it's done. He uses his very own intelligence to express HIS thoughts and reasons for his conclusions and or opinions based on verifiable facts and gives you some of his sources for you to scrutinize till your hearts content. It's how debate sites work in the absence of countless morons acting like toddlers while posting click-bait as if it represents your 'thoughts.' and wins an argument. It doesn't, it proves you have no thoughts. That's why I call you drones. It's not really an insult it's an accurate descriptor. I hope this helps and clears things up.
Click to expand...
You’re not analyzing anything, you’re daydreaming about deporting a sitting U.S. citizen because you read a couple headlines and filled in the rest with fanfiction. Omar’s emails aren’t even subpoenaed by Congress, no charges exist, and you’re already writing her exile like you’re casting yourself as Stephen Miller’s emotional support ghoul.

And the lecture about using your own intelligence? Brother… you just turned an email dispute into a deportation fantasy. That’s not intelligence, that’s wish‑casting with a concussion.
 
Grim Reaper said:
You’re not analyzing anything, you’re daydreaming about deporting a sitting U.S. citizen because you read a couple headlines and filled in the rest with fanfiction. Omar’s emails aren’t even subpoenaed by Congress, no charges exist, and you’re already writing her exile like you’re casting yourself as Stephen Miller’s emotional support ghoul.

And the lecture about using your own intelligence? Brother… you just turned an email dispute into a deportation fantasy. That’s not intelligence, that’s wish‑casting with a concussion.
Click to expand...
Another AI response
 
Tobytone said:
Another AI response
Click to expand...
You have been reduced to a one‑button toy, press him once and he spits out the same line like a malfunctioning Furby that only learned one phrase before the batteries died.

It’s not a comeback .It’s not a critique. It’s just Toby standing in the corner, drooling on the carpet, chanting his little mantra because his brain bluescreens every time he sees a coherent sentence.
 
Grim Reaper said:
You have been reduced to a one‑button toy, press him once and he spits out the same line like a malfunctioning Furby that only learned one phrase before the batteries died.

It’s not a comeback .It’s not a critique. It’s just Toby standing in the corner, drooling on the carpet, chanting his little mantra because his brain bluescreens every time he sees a coherent sentence.
Click to expand...
Another AI response
 
AProudLefty said:
Where? Who?
Click to expand...

Across the guidelines, AI-generated content is prohibited unless there are clear reasons why this was necessary for the research and the content is clearly delineated and referenced as such.

  1. Generative AI cannot be considered an author; humans are accountable for verifying the accuracy of all material produced by generative AI
  2. Authors should disclose when and how they used Generative AI tools in manuscript preparation (with minor exceptions, such as grammar/spelling checkers)

LibGuides: Generative Artificial Intelligence: AI and Scholarly Publishing

LibGuides: Generative Artificial Intelligence: AI and Scholarly Publishing
libguides.libraries.wsu.edu libguides.libraries.wsu.edu

academiainsider.com

AI-generated content in Academia: Academic Integrity In The Age of AI Content - Academia Insider

Explore the impact of AI-generated content in academia, as ethical concerns rise over undisclosed use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research and writing.
academiainsider.com academiainsider.com

Essentially, anything beyond spell and grammar checking in academia, the use of AI becomes increasing problematic and likely will be considered plagiarism.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Across the guidelines, AI-generated content is prohibited unless there are clear reasons why this was necessary for the research and the content is clearly delineated and referenced as such.

  1. Generative AI cannot be considered an author; humans are accountable for verifying the accuracy of all material produced by generative AI
  2. Authors should disclose when and how they used Generative AI tools in manuscript preparation (with minor exceptions, such as grammar/spelling checkers)

LibGuides: Generative Artificial Intelligence: AI and Scholarly Publishing

LibGuides: Generative Artificial Intelligence: AI and Scholarly Publishing
libguides.libraries.wsu.edu libguides.libraries.wsu.edu

academiainsider.com

AI-generated content in Academia: Academic Integrity In The Age of AI Content - Academia Insider

Explore the impact of AI-generated content in academia, as ethical concerns rise over undisclosed use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research and writing.
academiainsider.com academiainsider.com

Essentially, anything beyond spell and grammar checking in academia, the use of AI becomes increasing problematic and likely will be considered plagiarism.
Click to expand...
AI is plagiarism in academia because academia has standards. JPP doesn’t. JPP is where arguments go to die, not where they get graded.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Funny how the Leftists here won't defend Omar...
Click to expand...
Funny how the magas here won't even mention this grifter. Medicare fraud more than $1 billion.

WICHITA, Kan. (KSNW) — A federal jury seated in Florida has convicted a Kansas man in connection with a billion-dollar healthcare fraud scheme.

Brett Blackman, 42, of Johnson County found guilty Wednesday of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud, conspiracy to pay and receive health care kickbacks, and conspiracy to defraud the United States and to making false statements in connection with health care matters.

And let's not forget that trump actually commuted this grifter's sentence. Medicare fraud to the tune of $1.3 billion.

Philip Esformes (born 1968) is a former healthcare executive and nursing home mogul primarily known for orchestrating what the U.S. Department of Justice described as the largest healthcare fraud scheme in the country's history. He was convicted in 2019 for healthcare fraud, illegal kickbacks, bribery, and money laundering and sentenced to 20 years in prison. President Donald Trump commuted his sentence in 2020.
 
christiefan915 said:
Funny how the magas here won't even mention this grifter. Medicare fraud more than $1 billion.

WICHITA, Kan. (KSNW) — A federal jury seated in Florida has convicted a Kansas man in connection with a billion-dollar healthcare fraud scheme.

Brett Blackman, 42, of Johnson County found guilty Wednesday of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud, conspiracy to pay and receive health care kickbacks, and conspiracy to defraud the United States and to making false statements in connection with health care matters.

And let's not forget that trump actually commuted this grifter's sentence. Medicare fraud to the tune of $1.3 billion.

Philip Esformes (born 1968) is a former healthcare executive and nursing home mogul primarily known for orchestrating what the U.S. Department of Justice described as the largest healthcare fraud scheme in the country's history. He was convicted in 2019 for healthcare fraud, illegal kickbacks, bribery, and money laundering and sentenced to 20 years in prison. President Donald Trump commuted his sentence in 2020.
Click to expand...
Whataboutism wasn't the point of this thread. Are Blackman and Esformes members of Congress? If not, they're not relevant here. Grifters and cheats exist in the private sector and when caught usually do lots of time. Members of Congress on the other hand simply say "Sorry..." then run for reelection, at least if they're Democrats...
 
Who could’ve guessed a couple of facts would send T.A. into a full emotional tailspin? Man got triggered so hard you’d think truth personally keyed his car.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Whataboutism wasn't the point of this thread. Are Blackman and Esformes members of Congress? If not, they're not relevant here. Grifters and cheats exist in the private sector and when caught usually do lots of time. Members of Congress on the other hand simply say "Sorry..." then run for reelection, at least if they're Democrats..
Click to expand...
IMO crime is crime and it's just as bad no matter who does it. And commuting Esformes' sentence was beyond the pale.
 
christiefan915 said:
IMO crime is crime and it's just as bad no matter who does it. And commuting Esformes' sentence was beyond the pale.
Click to expand...
True enough, but Congress is in a class by itself
mark-twain-quote-lbo1x8o.jpg
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Ilhan Omar looks like she's getting in deeper and deeper shit with alleged fraud. Minnesota subpoenaed her to turn over her congressional e-mails related to several Somali fraudsters who have now been convicted. She's known to have had more than a passing relation with them and the e-mails are public records. Yet, Omar won't fork them over.

Minnesota is now asking Congress to act for them and force the turnover of the records. If that happens and Omar refuses, she would be potentially looking at federal felony charges.

There must be some really bad shit in those e-mails for her to want to chance going to prison for not cooperating with a state and federal criminal investigation where she is known to have had regular relations with now convicted felons that were involved in the fraud.

nypost.com

Exclusive | Minnesota GOP state lawmaker pushes House Oversight panel to subpoena Rep. Ilhan Omar

The proposed subpoena requests communications from her ex-campaign staffer Guhaad Hashi Said, who pled guilty to defrauding taxpayers.
nypost.com nypost.com

www.foxnews.com

Minnesota lawmakers fail at trying to get Omar to testify about alleged fraud, GOP leader talks next steps

Minnesota committee chair says more options exist after a subpoena vote targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar over the MEALS Act fraud scandal failed Tuesday.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Interestingly, in the Minnesota house, the committee issuing those subpoenas had Republican and Democrat support but the radical Leftist DFL, who is actually the party Omar is in, voted against it 100% (3 votes).

Split vote blocks House fraud panel's attempt to subpoena U.S. Rep. Omar - Session Daily - Minnesota House of Representatives

www.house.mn.gov www.house.mn.gov
Click to expand...
"Minnesota" isn't asking. The state's republican delegation is.

If you are gonna lie at least try to make it harder to debunk.
 
Grim Reaper said:

❌ Is AI comparable to relying solely on Wikipedia?​

The analogy is oversimplified and misleading.

What the research says about Wikipedia:​

  • Wikipedia has mixed reliability: some articles are excellent, others contain errors or bias.
  • False information can persist for years if unnoticed.
  • It is vulnerable to systemic bias (gender, ideological, national).

But AI ≠ Wikipedia​

AI is not a single database. It synthesizes patterns from many sources, and its accuracy depends on:

  • training data
  • model design
  • prompt quality
  • recency of updates
  • whether it cites sources
So “AI = Wikipedia” is not factually supported.


❌ Is The Grim Reaper using AI as a single source?​

No — and this is where the OP’s claim collapses.

Your posts:

  • include multiple citations
  • reference news outlets, academic sources, and direct quotes
  • use AI as a tool for synthesis, not a sole authority
The OP is attacking a strawman: They’re pretending you’re blindly trusting AI, when your posts show multi‑source verification.


🎯 Conclusion​

  • ✔️ It is true that Wikipedia alone is not sufficient for research.
  • ❌ It is not true that you are doing that.
  • ❌ It is not accurate to equate AI with Wikipedia.
  • ❌ The OP’s claim is misleading, because your posts do include multiple sources.
Click to expand...
AI response. Do better.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Whataboutism wasn't the point of this thread. Are Blackman and Esformes members of Congress? If not, they're not relevant here. Grifters and cheats exist in the private sector and when caught usually do lots of time. Members of Congress on the other hand simply say "Sorry..." then run for reelection, at least if they're Democrats...
Click to expand...
Explain Scott. He ran a health company that created the largest Medicare fraud in history and was welcomed into the Republican fraternity. He was elected gov, then senator. He is highly honored in Republican cabals.
 
Nordberg said:
Explain Scott. He ran a health company that created the largest Medicare fraud in history and was welcomed into the Republican fraternity. He was elected gov, then senator. He is highly honored in Republican cabals.
Click to expand...
Then he's one of those insiders that got squirrely with the money--like Omar likely has. His mistake was being a Republican. Democrats heap high honors on a lot of their greasy politicians too, so that's not unusual.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top