Just because I'm interested questions about the historicity of Siddhartha Buddha, King David, or Saul of Tarsus does not mean I want to become Buddhist, Jewish, or Catholic.that's your intention of the thread!
to prove Christianity through archaelogy!
why are you denying it?
Historicity of Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha
Wiki: The ancient Indians were generally unconcerned with chronologies, being more focused on philosophy. Buddhist texts reflect this tendency.
British author Karen Armstrong writes that although there is very little information that can be considered historically sound, we can be reasonably confident that Siddhārtha Gautama did exist as a historical figure.
Scholars are hesitant to make claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life. Most of them accept that the Buddha lived, taught, and founded a monastic order during the Mahajanapada, and during the reign of Bimbisara.
There...
British author Karen Armstrong writes that although there is very little information that can be considered historically sound, we can be reasonably confident that Siddhārtha Gautama did exist as a historical figure.
Scholars are hesitant to make claims about the historical facts of the Buddha's life. Most of them accept that the Buddha lived, taught, and founded a monastic order during the Mahajanapada, and during the reign of Bimbisara.
There...
