Michelle Bachman is paying 50 million dollars a day for cosmetics!

Watermarx said:
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/e1gsd/michelle_bachman_is_paying_50_million_a_day_of/

Michelle Bachman is paying $50 million a day of taxpayer money on cosmetics

This [1] source says she's spending maybe OVER $50 million a day of taxpayer money on cosmetics! This is completely outrageous!
Click to expand...

Check out the first video here. http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/michelle-bachmann-gives-voice-rights

While she does say crazy things one can not help but notice those full, glossy lips and the movement of her cheeks while she speaks. Mute the sound and just watch the lips moving. Then imagine those beautiful eyes looking up at you.

Those cosmetics are definitely doing their job. :D
 
We all know this is ridiculous, but the right will continue to tell us how Obama was going to spend 2 billion to go to India. Beck, Rush and Bachman have been reporting this for days, shit Bachman was on 360 last night spouting it again, and it's not true.
 
Socrtease said:
We all know this is ridiculous, but the right will continue to tell us how Obama was going to spend 2 billion to go to India. Beck, Rush and Bachman have been reporting this for days, shit Bachman was on 360 last night spouting it again, and it's not true.
Click to expand...
A bit of transparency would resolve this. However, I laughed when I read that 34 warships were going there... I mean, come on. That's a bit over 10% of our entire Navy's resources in that area...

It certainly wouldn't put the President in danger to know the actual accounting for the cost of such a trip.
 
Damocles said:
A bit of transparency would resolve this. However, I laughed when I read that 34 warships were going there... I mean, come on. That's a bit over 10% of our entire Navy's resources in that area...

It certainly wouldn't put the President in danger to know the actual accounting for the cost of such a trip.
Click to expand...


A bit of transparency would resolve what? There is nothing to resolve. The claims being made are transparently bullshit.
 
Damocles said:
A bit of transparency would resolve this. However, I laughed when I read that 34 warships were going there... I mean, come on. That's a bit over 10% of our entire Navy's resources in that area...

It certainly wouldn't put the President in danger to know the actual accounting for the cost of such a trip.
Click to expand...


President Obama's trip to India will cost the U.S. $200m-a-day, it was reported today.

The visit - part of a 10-trip to Asia - will take place amid unprecedented levels of security in the city of Mumbai, where terrorists killed at least 173 people two years ago.

Extreme measures to ensure the safety of President Obama will include the complete booking of the 570-room Taj Mahal Hotel for his security entourage
 
Ice Dancer said:
President Obama's trip to India will cost the U.S. $200m-a-day, it was reported today.

The visit - part of a 10-trip to Asia - will take place amid unprecedented levels of security in the city of Mumbai, where terrorists killed at least 173 people two years ago.

Extreme measures to ensure the safety of President Obama will include the complete booking of the 570-room Taj Mahal Hotel for his security entourage
Click to expand...


We've all seen that article and we are all well aware that it is suitable for use as fertilizer and little else.
 
Ice Dancer said:
President Obama's trip to India will cost the U.S. $200m-a-day, it was reported today.

The visit - part of a 10-trip to Asia - will take place amid unprecedented levels of security in the city of Mumbai, where terrorists killed at least 173 people two years ago.

Extreme measures to ensure the safety of President Obama will include the complete booking of the 570-room Taj Mahal Hotel for his security entourage
Click to expand...


Tom Prendergasp! will be able to vouch for the veracity of these claims from this bastion of credible news!
 
NigelTufnel said:
We've all seen that article and we are all well aware that it is suitable for use as fertilizer and little else.
Click to expand...

The point being dorkamus is that conservatives did not make it up, they merely seized upon what was being reported as dems themselves have done myriads of times as well. Perhaps if the "supposedly most transparent WH" would actually try being transparent???
 
Watermarx said:
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/e1gsd/michelle_bachman_is_paying_50_million_a_day_of/

Michelle Bachman is paying $50 million a day of taxpayer money on cosmetics

This [1] source says she's spending maybe OVER $50 million a day of taxpayer money on cosmetics! This is completely outrageous!
Click to expand...

Well it must be working. She looks really good and is a winner.

Now on to the more serious stuff....I absolutely hate the sort of stuff about the trip Obama is making. Beck, Limbaugh and the like need to shut up and find something else to talk about. Their claims are outrageous.
 
Ice Dancer said:
The point being dorkamus is that conservatives did not make it up, they merely seized upon what was being reported as dems themselves have done myriads of times as well. Perhaps if the "supposedly most transparent WH" would actually try being transparent???
Click to expand...


"Transparency" doesn't require the White House to give out every piece of irrelevant information requested by a bunch of knownothing jackasses. In all my years I have never heard of anyone questioning the cost of a president's diplomatic trips abroad. Not once.
 
NigelTufnel said:
We've all seen that article and we are all well aware that it is suitable for use as fertilizer and little else.
Click to expand...
Didn't one of the Navy officials confirm it was fertilizer, see, if you read it on the web when you are a connie, you believe it! I knew why Watermark posted the Bachman article and we all know it is crap, but if they had used the name Pelosi, well, you know the rest of the story!
 
leaningright said:
Well it must be working. She looks really good and is a winner.

Now on to the more serious stuff....I absolutely hate the sort of stuff about the trip Obama is making. Beck, Limbaugh and the like need to shut up and find something else to talk about. Their claims are outrageous.
Click to expand...

Spending money to make women look better is a legitimate government function.
 
Damocles said:
However it still doesn't answer the question, how much is the full price of the trip?
Click to expand...
Better question, is the trip worth the cost? They won't disclose the cost or the operation till after the fact because of the security needed, they don't tell what kind of guns they will have at the ready! and they probably don't need as much security as when Bush traveled aboard, but this is just my speculation and nothing more.
 
leaningright said:
Well it must be working. She looks really good and is a winner.

Now on to the more serious stuff....I absolutely hate the sort of stuff about the trip Obama is making. Beck, Limbaugh and the like need to shut up and find something else to talk about. Their claims are outrageous.
Click to expand...
Michelle Bachman's claims are pretty absurd, also!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top