Listening to your overseas phone calls?- WRONG! Fondling your balls?- OKAY!

THis from someone who is okay with them listening on private telephone converstations?
You are mistaken and once again exhibit an incredible ability to forget anything I've said and replace it with what you want to believe.

First report of wiretapping by NSA. My response? "It almost makes me ill..."

I spoke about working there and the strong belief that the NSA should never be used to listen in on anything that originated from the US. How it was impressed on us as nearly a core value... I couldn't imagine ever listening to anything originating from the US. It is wrong. It is one of the number 1 things I mentioned every single time I spoke poorly of Bush, along with reckless spending and idiotic "compassionate" rubbish like the Pill Bill.

I grow tired of repeating the same thing every time you try to post something like this about me.

You are invariably wrong about my opinion every time you try to play "gotcha" with me. You should really stop trying, years of the same thing happening should have given you a hint that maybe you should think twice before you start "guessing" at my opinion based on whatever you read "all republicans" believe at "kneejerkstupidliberalblogspot.lib"

It is also one of the worst things that Obama has done, he INCREASED the warrantless wiretapping. Everything sucky that Bush has done, Obama seems to have a goal of making it worse, wiretapping, health care, Afghanistan...
 
Have you not been following this story in the news?

Yes, Ive been following the news, and if you read past the headline you will see that its not everyone, and that they are not touching "junk" unless by accident.

Read more than the screaming hysterical headline and you will get a more accurate picture of what is happening.

This should not be read to say that I agree with what is happening.
 
You are mistaken and once again exhibit an incredible ability to forget anything I've said and replace it with what you want to believe.

First report of wiretapping by NSA. My response? "It almost makes me ill..."

I spoke about working there and the strong belief that the NSA should never be used to listen in on anything that originated from the US. How it was impressed on us as nearly a core value... I couldn't imagine ever listening to anything originating from the US. It is wrong. It is one of the number 1 things I mentioned every single time I spoke poorly of Bush, along with reckless spending and idiotic "compassionate" rubbish like the Pill Bill.

I grow tired of repeating the same thing every time you try to post something like this about me.

You are invariably wrong about my opinion every time you try to play "gotcha" with me. You should really stop trying, years of the same thing happening should have given you a hint that maybe you should think twice before you start "guessing" at my opinion based on whatever you read "all republicans" believe at "kneejerkstupidliberalblogspot.lib"

It is also one of the worst things that Obama has done, he INCREASED the warrantless wiretapping. Everything sucky that Bush has done, Obama seems to have a goal of making it worse, wiretapping, health care, Afghanistan...

I appologize if I misremembered. If has been your position you have much more integrity than Dixie and the vast majority of the Ultra Caffinated radical tea whacks.
 
pornography (pɔːˈnɒɡrəfɪ)

— n
1. writings, pictures, films, etc, designed to stimulate sexual excitement
 
Sure, they have the right to lobby like every other industry sector... what is your point? They don't set the policies, the Federal government does. These screenings are being conducted by TSA, not the airlines. And they didn't ASK the airlines whether they minded or not!

and you don't think that if the airline industry made the case to the government that the new screening efforts were significantly damaging their industry, that the government would not listen? You don't think that if the airline industry backed up that factual case with strong lobbying efforts and strong political contributions to legislators who were committed to changing the screening methods, the end result would be some modification that was aimed at placating that industry?

that is my point.
 
and you don't think that if the airline industry made the case to the government that the new screening efforts were significantly damaging their industry, that the government would not listen? You don't think that if the airline industry backed up that factual case with strong lobbying efforts and strong political contributions to legislators who were committed to changing the screening methods, the end result would be some modification that was aimed at placating that industry?

that is my point.
Your wasting your time ORF. Dixie's a partisan hack. He could give a flying fuck less on this issue. If TSA were to actually lessen security procedures Dixie would be yelling from the hill tops about how them pin headed liberals don't care about peoples safety.
 
Excessive farting may lead to an extensive cavity search.

Has anyone noticed that the people feeling off others are black on white?
 
Last edited:
These angury rant people are so desperate for something to be upset about they have begun making shit up...!
 
In your fantasies and dreams maybe.... or if you can call DOUBLING the unemployment "bailing us out" perhaps. I kind of think a majority of America disagrees with you, since they sent his Democrat House to the House!

Dream on, sucka. :bleh:

The majority of America didn't vote.
 
The higher the turnout the better it is for Liberals.

Thats a basic rule that is almost always true.
 
Yes, Ive been following the news, and if you read past the headline you will see that its not everyone, and that they are not touching "junk" unless by accident.

Read more than the screaming hysterical headline and you will get a more accurate picture of what is happening.

This should not be read to say that I agree with what is happening.

Oh yes they do touch junk...and they do it on purpose. All passenger airporports will make passengers subject to the newly phrased "porno scans" or the invasive body "grope" search. This includes women, infants and children-the elderly. The one group who may be exempt are muslim women...at least our Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is considering exempting them.

Those who believe the government’s incredible claim that TSA employees don’t pay attention to people’s private areas should ask Rolando Negrin, a 44 year old TSA worker who is now known around the world for having an exceptionally small penis. Negrin was harassed for days by fellow employees who saw the size of his penis during a training session and mocked him because of it. The berating was so brutal that Negrin finally unleashed on the bullies, landing him in jail while his abusive coworkers remain at large, preying upon the American sheep that willingly pass through the body scanning machines. Everyone can be assured that – if they have anything peculiar or appealing in their anatomy that the TSA workers will be laughing over it over by the water cooler. Still, privacy concerns and government retribution are not the only reason body scanners are bad: they are useless.
 
Oh yes they do touch junk...and they do it on purpose. All passenger airporports will make passengers subject to the newly phrased "porno scans" or the invasive body "grope" search. This includes women, infants and children-the elderly. The one group who may be exempt are muslim women...at least our Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is considering exempting them.

Those who believe the government’s incredible claim that TSA employees don’t pay attention to people’s private areas should ask Rolando Negrin, a 44 year old TSA worker who is now known around the world for having an exceptionally small penis. Negrin was harassed for days by fellow employees who saw the size of his penis during a training session and mocked him because of it. The berating was so brutal that Negrin finally unleashed on the bullies, landing him in jail while his abusive coworkers remain at large, preying upon the American sheep that willingly pass through the body scanning machines. Everyone can be assured that – if they have anything peculiar or appealing in their anatomy that the TSA workers will be laughing over it over by the water cooler. Still, privacy concerns and government retribution are not the only reason body scanners are bad: they are useless.

I disagree with the policy of the TSA, I belive it is violative of the 4th Amendment... But you are LYING about the policy and doing so harms your argument.

Stick with the truth, it is strong enough on this point!
 
Have you not been following this story in the news?
Not everybody is being fondled, first you would have to be one of the randomly selected people to get a full body scan; then you'd have to reject the scan and choose to get the pat down instead.
 
Not everybody is being fondled, first you would have to be one of the randomly selected people to get a full body scan; then you'd have to reject the scan and choose to get the pat down instead.

Finally a dose of honesty.

I appologise for having you wrong on this issue.
 
Not everybody is being fondled, first you would have to be one of the randomly selected people to get a full body scan; then you'd have to reject the scan and choose to get the pat down instead.

Right now the standard practice is every 10th person. What I said was that all persons are subject to this...they are. You have no way of knowing when you get into a line if you will be the 10th person. This is absolutely the stupidest security measure possible as well as the most inavsive!
 
Back
Top