and you idiots want the government running shit

no problem. don't pull a mott though and think that as a Libertarian, i'm also an anarchist. The government should only be able to run the bare minimum allowed by the constitution. This story in the OP shows yet one more screwup failure by them.

mott is a dork and doesn't understand...i support your stance and at times lean towards it
 
no problem. don't pull a mott though and think that as a Libertarian, i'm also an anarchist. The government should only be able to run the bare minimum allowed by the constitution. This story in the OP shows yet one more screwup failure by them.
The constitution does allow for a military and for the Executive to run wars...
 
again, oh beleaguered one, the argument is to show that government already screws up things they DO have power to run, why would anyone want them to run things they DON'T have power to run.
You don't need Afghanistan to point that out, just go to a county meeting where they are arguing fence lines. It will really open your eyes...
 
lol....i walked into that one :palm:

well, you backed onto it!


OH!
diceman.jpg
 
Back
Top