Anti-earmark Tea Party Caucus takes $1 billion in earmarks

Thanks for the answer. Dink.

I actually do. Are these people requesting funds they do not see as earmarks? I honestly don't know.


We've been through this. Everyone knows what a fucking earmark is except the people that like to request them while pretending to be against them.
 
We've been through this. Everyone knows what a fucking earmark is except the people that like to request them while pretending to be against them.
You and I haven't "been through this", nor is it apparent that everybody uses the same definitions of the word. Again, I thank you for participating, but now can somebody answer my question?
 
We've been through this. Everyone knows what a fucking earmark is except the people that like to request them while pretending to be against them.

thats not true...i've shown you multiple understandings of earmarks...you as usual don't pay attention to anything that doesn't fit your world view
 
thats not true...i've shown you multiple understandings of earmarks...you as usual don't pay attention to anything that doesn't fit your world view


Piss off, Yurt. I demonstrated to your forgetful ass that the House and Senate for the 111th Congress clearly defined what earmarks are such that there can be no dispute as to the definition thereof for the 111th Congress. Assuming for purposes of argument that there really are "multiple understandings of earmarks" and that those alleged "multiple understandings" are legitimate, for the 111th Congress, of which these 52 jackasses were members, that is not the case.


P.S. Perhaps you could link to where you showed me multiple understandings of earmarks because I don't remember that in the least.
 
Piss off, Yurt. I demonstrated to your forgetful ass that the House and Senate for the 111th Congress clearly defined what earmarks are such that there can be no dispute as to the definition thereof for the 111th Congress. Assuming for purposes of argument that there really are "multiple understandings of earmarks" and that those alleged "multiple understandings" are legitimate, for the 111th Congress, of which these 52 jackasses were members, that is not the case.


P.S. Perhaps you could link to where you showed me multiple understandings of earmarks because I don't remember that in the least.

:fu:
 
Back
Top