What can be done

Oh that's utter non-sense. There's not a business owner in the world that doesn't want to be completely unregulated, that is, until someone does something that hurts their business, then they want them regulated (but not themselves of course). What your suggesting is pure hypocrisy. As a citizen of this nation I have certain rights, including my property rights and if your business can't deal with the regulations put in place to protect my rights, then please feel free to leave, in fact, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

It is the business of business to maximize profits. If that means my rights have to be sacrificed so they can profit then they would have no moral qualms in doing so. This is why we have regulations.

Business people like you just described disgust the hell out of me. They want to mooch off of all our public assets, services and infrastructure but cry like little babies when they are forced to play by the rules and are asked to pay for their fair share of public services that they profit hugely from.

Well here's the golden rule of doing business in America pal, "Ass, gas or grass, No one rides for free!"

If they think their going to get a free ride some where else, then they are certainly free to go there. My guess is their in for a big wake up call.

You're very short sited. It's one thing to be regulated. It's another to be over-regulated. You're putting words in my mouth because of your short sited lack of education in the business world.

"You don't want job creation" is all I get out of your lame statements.

Why not take 99% of their gross profits? Mr. I haven't a clue as to why the job market (good Jobs) is decreasing.
 
You just began ranting about your lopsided view of things. Of course business wants to avoid any and all kind of regulation. and of course they want cheaper labor. your vision of a society run by the whims of corporate fancy is a dystopia in the first degree.

You sound like Marx.
 
He said fix the problem not make if worse. Why the fuck would we vote for the people that drove us into the ditch in the first place?

Now I'm not to happy that Dems haven't exactly gotten us out of the ditch more quickly but I aint exactly forgotten it was incompetent Republican ideologues that got us into this fucking mess in the first place.

Is Barney Frank a Republican? Is Chris Dodd? They were largely responsible for the legislation which obligated Freddy and Fannie to make loans they wouldn't have normally made, to people who couldn't pay them back. While Bush took his share of credit for putting poor unfortunate blacks in new houses for the first time, and this was the highlight of his 'Compassionate Conservatism' initiative, it was 'LIBEWAL DEMOCWATS' who overwhelmingly supported and passed it into law. Conservatives were mostly opposed to this, and warned against it at the time, and it fell on deaf ears.

I've had it with the car driving in the ditch analogies, we've never been in a car, we're in a lear jet. And we're not in a ditch, we're bottoming out in the Grand Canyon at Mach 3. You people have no fucking idea you're even in a cockpit, you think you're driving a car in a ditch! And you're idea of "driving" is like a two-year-old's idea!
 
You're very short sited. It's one thing to be regulated. It's another to be over-regulated. You're putting words in my mouth because of your short sited lack of education in the business world.

"You don't want job creation" is all I get out of your lame statements.

Why not take 99% of their gross profits? Mr. I haven't a clue as to why the job market (good Jobs) is decreasing.
Now, what I reject is this "laissez faire" mentality. We may have a great degree of regulation in this nation to protect the public, consumers, workers and other stake holders but considering the advantages of the infrastructure and public services available at an incredibly low rate of taxation compared to most of the industrialized world not to mention on of the most skilled work forces in the world the US has the most business friendly climate in the world. What your asking isn't job creation, ya'll want slave creation. Fuck that.
 
Nothing seems to work so far because liberal democrats are running government. The president is an anti-business Marxist who hates capitalism. Haven't you heard all the horror stories about greedy big corporations, wall street, the rich people who have more than they deserve? The left has waged an all-out war on capitalism for the better part of the last decade, and show no signs of letting up. You can't expect job creation in such an environment.

Now, the next big thing is this... Government doesn't create jobs! It doesn't matter what the politicians say, or what they promise you, the government simply can't create jobs. Oh, they can throw out a few public sector jobs here and there, create a new department of whatever, hire more government workers to make twice what they deserve and be eligible for pension plans and such, but by-and-large, the government simply can't create enough jobs to make a difference. About the only time there has ever been an exception to this, is when government has 'created jobs' as a US soldier in a time of war. Private sector job creation happens in the private sector, not government. In order to stimulate private sector job creation, you have to encourage the people in the private sector who have the wealth to create jobs. Nothing this administration has done, is the least bit encouraging to those people. You have to come up with ways to incentivize creation of new jobs, and again, this administration has not even entertained such an idea, they are hell-bent on doing the diametric opposite, because they are Marxist Socialists.

You see, the Marxist-Socialist idea, is to stifle capitalism and business, drive unemployment even higher, create a worse condition for the average Joe. By doing this, you become desperate for answers, like your thread here sounds... Oh my goodness, what can we do? *wringing hands* Well, what we can do, is let government take over the means of production! Then the government can determine where you need to work and what you need to do, to best serve the commune as a whole. In theory, this is supposed to be preferable to capitalism, free enterprise, and free market economics. The problem is, it has failed miserably every time it has been tried in human history.

Back to your question of what can be done. Like I said, it's really not that complicated. Congress has to enact legislation to ease restrictions and burdens on corporate America, to encourage hiring and growth, and to give entrepreneurs an incentive to create new jobs, through tax breaks or other means at their disposal. Then, the government has to get out of the way, and let capitalism work. That's not that difficult, it's a pretty simple solution. Unfortunately, it goes against everything Marxist Socialists want to accomplish.
You think Obama is anti business, ahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, oh, god that was good.
 
This statement shows your lack of knowledge about business.

Corps employ a small % of people compared to the Mom & Pops and small business.

Taxes and regulations do have a major factor in corps locating. Cheap labor does to, but your to focused on corps, & unions.
Isn't Wal Mart the largest employee in America, or have they been replaced?
 
You think Obama is anti business, ahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, oh, god that was good.
He also thinks Obama is a secret Muslim born in Kenya. Keep in mind, Dixie was the biggest supporter of the vast national train wreck that was George W. Bush so....he doesn't exactly have a lot of credibility. I mean we've seen what his idea of good governance is. Dropping the ball on terrorism, immoral wars of aggression and being asleep at the wheel while an entire city drowns and our economy collapses. This is what Dixie considers to be good government. LOL
 
Back
Top