Does the Net Neutrality rule violate the Bill of Rights?

Bottom line, businesses want the ability to buy up all the bandwidth and make competitor services and sites slow.

Net neutrality will save us from internet bandwidth totalitarian fascism.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Bottom line, businesses want the ability to buy up all the bandwidth and make competitor services and sites slow.


They do? Have any sources for that statement?



Net neutrality will save us from internet bandwidth totalitarian fascism. It will? How?
Click to expand...

Can you give some examples of "internet bandwidth totalitarian fascism"?
 
Mojo said:
I'll need some examples of "internet bandwidth totalitarian fascism" first.
Click to expand...

No you don't.

but here...

Think of it as large corporations having the ability to buy all the bandwidth, creating a market that prices small company websites out of the market.
 
Mojo said:
Got any evidence to support that assessment and your prediction?

Or is that too much to ask?
Click to expand...

you bash this order, yet when i give you the pertinent parts of the order you run away from actual debate

apparently its too much to ask that you back up your comments about this
 
Mojo said:
Which "large corporations" have done this? Got a list?
Click to expand...

I dont know that any have. They';d like too. This is a preeemptive measure.


When they made laws against murder, nobody was against it saying, "give me a list of future murderers". That would be assinine.
 
AssHatZombie said:
I dont know that any have. They';d like too. This is a preeemptive measure.


When they made laws against murder, nobody was against it saying, "give me a list of future murderers". That would be assinine.
Click to expand...

So you don't know any that "have", but you know who'd "like to"?
 
Mojo said:
How do you know?
Click to expand...

Because in the new rules a company like Amazon could not pay more to a company like Comcast to load its ads and content faster then say a small bookdealer's site. IMO, regulation always has its pro's and con's. Are we now going to have to pay usage fees so that government can afford this new regulation? Personally I have a feeling that it's just another way for the government to get its eyes and ears into our computers...
 
Mojo said:
It's astounding how many limited government folks are all for Net Neutrality, which is nothing if not additional government regulation of free enterprise...even stranger when you add the fact that nobody has see the final Order yet.
Click to expand...

it shouldn't be. at least for people that can think straight.

Limited government folks don't want zero regulation, they want minimal regulation. regulation that has the sole purpose of providing fairness and equality for every individual. If what i've read about this net neutrality is correct, this will prevent the major ISPs from limiting bandwidth based on the fees an individual purchases. In other words, one price for all consumers and equal amounts of bandwidth to use.
 
Mojo said:
So you think the government should regulate WalMart's buying agreements?
Click to expand...

there already is a regulation in place for these kinds of things, called anti trust laws. there isn't a need to create more.

really, liberals and trolls should recognize that THESE types of issues are why the commerce clause was truly written.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
there already is a regulation in place for these kinds of things, called anti trust laws. there isn't a need to create more.

really, liberals and trolls should recognize that THESE types of issues are why the commerce clause was truly written.
Click to expand...

So the anti-trust laws already in place aren't preventing the WalMart agreements you cited, but there "there isn't a need to create more"?

Got it.

If I meet any liberals or trolls, I'll pass along your nuggets of wisdom.
 
Mojo said:
So the anti-trust laws already in place aren't preventing the WalMart agreements you cited, but there "there isn't a need to create more"?

Got it.

If I meet any liberals or trolls, I'll pass along your nuggets of wisdom.
Click to expand...

either you're that ignorant, or you're being deliberately obtuse.

It isn't that the anti trust laws aren't preventing the agreements, it's that the DoJ isn't pursuing them because big government is in the pocket of big business.
 
doesn't everyone currently pay for their bandwidth now?......I know that most of the ISP I have seen set their rates of usage by what your upload and download speeds are and charge for handling your web sites based on how much activity there is on them.......
 
SmarterThanYou said:
either you're that ignorant, or you're being deliberately obtuse.

It isn't that the anti trust laws aren't preventing the agreements, it's that the DoJ isn't pursuing them because big government is in the pocket of big business.
Click to expand...

If you have evidence of corruption, isn't it your civic duty to report it to the proper authorities?
 
Mojo said:
If you have evidence of corruption, isn't it your civic duty to report it to the proper authorities?
Click to expand...


so i'm going to report incompetence of the DoJ, to the DoJ???????/

shaq.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top