Do you still support America's genocide in the Middle East?

Rune

Mjölner
One million or more dead so far, untold wounded, homeless, infrastructure destroyed, are we close to done yet?
 
One million or more dead so far, untold wounded, homeless, infrastructure destroyed, are we close to done yet?

Economy in tatters, unemployed at record highs and you want to stop killing people??? You can't afford to stop killing people! You are living in a 'permanent state of conflict' economy.
 
One million or more dead so far, untold wounded, homeless, infrastructure destroyed, are we close to done yet?

Afganistan is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. America has rebuilt everything we blew up and has been doing massive infrastructure projects. We have built lots of roads, hospitals, power plants, schools, power lines. We have reimbursted people for destruction of property. America creates lots of jobs in Afganistan. We bribe people which allows them to hire more workers. We fund education and send lots of medical supplies. America funnels a lot of donations to Afganistan. A lot Less people are dying now then in the 90
s.
Then theirs Iraq. Saddam only commited genocide and used weapons of mass destruction. Lots of people died under his rain. A lot Less people are dying now then under Saddam. America caused rapid economic growth in Iraq. We rebuilt everything we destroyed and massively invested in the countries infrastructure. Economically Iraq and Afganistan are better off that we invaded them. Educationally, Infrastructure is better off because of U.S. Afganies and Iraqies have more freedom and money now.
 
Genocide means the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group. In Whole or in part.
Thanks for reading a dictionary.

Anyway, while I don't support undeclared wars I fully comprehend that it is far different than "genocide"... In no way have we tried to systematically destroy in whole or in part the genetic or social line of any people in the middle east during either of the undeclared wars we've pressed upon ourselves.
 
Thanks for reading a dictionary.

Anyway, while I don't support undeclared wars I fully comprehend that it is far different than "genocide"... In no way have we tried to systematically destroy in whole or in part the genetic or social line of any people in the middle east during either of the undeclared wars we've pressed upon ourselves.

Your very welcome.
 
Nope... still have BILLIONS more to kill. Sorry. Close your eyes! :palm:

Here I thought you were an expert on the Constitution and America, no one who knows our history would make such a statement and say they love the USA and our form of government.
 
Do you actually understand the word "genocide"?

Whether or not we are actively engaged in genocide is a matter of opinion, not dictionary definitions.

Whether or not this is genocide is a matter of opinion, not defintion.

In my opinion, it is.
 
Afganistan is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. America has rebuilt everything we blew up and has been doing massive infrastructure projects. We have built lots of roads, hospitals, power plants, schools, power lines. We have reimbursted people for destruction of property. America creates lots of jobs in Afganistan. We bribe people which allows them to hire more workers. We fund education and send lots of medical supplies. America funnels a lot of donations to Afganistan. A lot Less people are dying now then in the 90
s.
Then theirs Iraq. Saddam only commited genocide and used weapons of mass destruction. Lots of people died under his rain. A lot Less people are dying now then under Saddam. America caused rapid economic growth in Iraq. We rebuilt everything we destroyed and massively invested in the countries infrastructure. Economically Iraq and Afganistan are better off that we invaded them. Educationally, Infrastructure is better off because of U.S. Afganies and Iraqies have more freedom and money now.

Glad you believe this drivel. I am sure you sleep better as a result.
 
Whether or not we are actively engaged in genocide is a matter of opinion, not dictionary definitions.

Whether or not this is genocide is a matter of opinion, not defintion.

In my opinion, it is.
That would be incorrect. Words actually mean things and aren't based on how you feel that day.

You use this word to invoke emotionality to try to end conversation on a subject you find uncomfortable to pursue. Reality shows us that in no way do the unconstitutionally undeclared wars fall into the category of "genocide" based on what the word actually means.

You dislike the wars so you attempt to shut down all debate on the topic using a verbal nuclear option. This is the equivalent of somebody calling another a "racist" if they dislike a policy pushed by the White House.
 
I believe the last time that the USA participated in genocide was against the American Natives, an example, the Trail of Tears.
 
The USA doesn't have the stomach for genocide anymore, otherwise there would have been a different ending for both Vietnam and Iraq.
 
Genocide eh? Because when I was over there (2007) I was told not to shoot anyone unless they were within 25m of my truck. Which is basically point blank. Had my chain of commando known about the genocide I'm sure I would have been allowed to light up the town right next to the base every night.
 
Exactly, but that didn't happen, thank goodness, but I am not a hawk, as you know, I hate war! I want to win them over with drugs, alcohol, porno, the internet, birth control and education for women! all those wonderful Western things!
 
Back
Top