More evidence of biased media

hehehe Obama calls americans slugs. He must be reading my posts. I love that word.

See there?

You didn't need the full audio after all.

It makes is so much easier for Breitbart and you nutbars who frequent biggovernment.com to just make up whatever bullshit you want to.
 
You are an idiot. Do you understand sarcasm?

According to the chronology of posts theorem you seem to be addressing yourself as an idiot who doesn't understand sarcasm.

True? From readng your earlier posts I had asumed you were not an idiot.
 
According to the chronology of posts theorem you seem to be addressing yourself as an idiot who doesn't understand sarcasm.

True? From readng your earlier posts I had asumed you were not an idiot.

A little fyi; media is biased, generaly to the benefit of the owner.
 
I have to admit, Obama scores points with me when he knocks lazy government workers. This could only hurt him with his own base.
 
A little fyi; media is biased, generaly to the benefit of the owner.

No doubt about it, and when all the media outlets rely on government to have stories to report on for more than half of their material, we should demand they make all government footage and recording subject to FOI requests
 
They are slugs but they are useful slugs. They don't cost the Democrat Party a dime yet they are reliable votes.
 
A user would think of them as useful.

His point is valid. Folks indoctrinated into the worker Vs. employer mentality suffer from the hammer/nail syndrome. Not every field is so saturated that employers can exploit the labor force.

What I do not understand about public sector unions is this: Why do we need an extra layer of protection within the governing body which oversees all the labor enforcement?

Should we have an extra police force within the police department which is an adversary to the normal police? I see it as the same thing. Why is government so inept that we must have a union to keep the people from getting inadequate treatment?


Unions in public sector are superfluous
 
His point is valid. Folks indoctrinated into the worker Vs. employer mentality suffer from the hammer/nail syndrome. Not every field is so saturated that employers can exploit the labor force.

What I do not understand about public sector unions is this: Why do we need an extra layer of protection within the governing body which oversees all the labor enforcement?

Should we have an extra police force within the police department which is an adversary to the normal police? I see it as the same thing. Why is government so inept that we must have a union to keep the people from getting inadequate treatment?


Unions in public sector are superfluous

There is indeed a second police force adversary to the primary, known as Internal Affairs, as it should be. Just as the military has M.P.s, the feds have checks and balances, etc.

This is odd coming from you. The bastards aren't trustworthy, plain and simple.
 
His point is valid. Folks indoctrinated into the worker Vs. employer mentality suffer from the hammer/nail syndrome. Not every field is so saturated that employers can exploit the labor force.

What I do not understand about public sector unions is this: Why do we need an extra layer of protection within the governing body which oversees all the labor enforcement?

Should we have an extra police force within the police department which is an adversary to the normal police? I see it as the same thing. Why is government so inept that we must have a union to keep the people from getting inadequate treatment?

Unions in public sector are superfluous

Like any big business/corporation there are jackass bosses. Employees need an advocate to defend them. The "government" is not supervising the average employee. It is a regular person, a lead hand, a foreman, an office manager....whatever one wishes to call them....regular people capable of being prejudiced, unfair, miserable.....a jackass.
 
Back
Top