the ATF has some 'splaining' to do

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Of course, everyone knows presidents always root out all corruption within the government and are never part of it. Presidents are awesome. Authority figures are worthy of our trust. How could they even get to that level without being good people?

do you know what "rogue" means?

 

[Phyllis Diller]

do you know what "rogue" means?

Yes, but what does that have to do with your dipshitted level of asswiped naivete?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Yes, but what does that have to do with your dipshitted level of asswiped naivete?

pimple brain....i don't see how they are rogue when then continue to get funding and operate with approval from the president....

 

[Phyllis Diller]

pimple brain....i don't see how they are rogue when then continue to get funding and operate with approval from the president....

They're rogue relative to the interests of the american people. So is the president.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

They're rogue relative to the interests of the american people. So is the president.

do you believe our whole government is rogue?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

do you believe our whole government is rogue?

no, just tyrannical.

"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry."
— Thomas Jefferson

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

no, just tyrannical.

"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry."
— Thomas Jefferson

what is illegal for us and not the government....nuclear weapons...

 

[Taichiliberal]

Let's see: the gov't is tyrannical and rogue.....I wonder if that's regardless of what party is in power? I didn't read all this trash talk on the chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years. and there was total silence or grand support for the Patriot Act, or when the Shrub threw FISA out the window. Hypocrisy from the neocon/birther/oather/teabagger cabal...Go figure.

Me, I'll wait and see if heads will roll at the ATF.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Let's see: the gov't is tyrannical and rogue.....I wonder if that's regardless of what party is in power? I didn't read all this trash talk on the chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years. and there was total silence or grand support for the Patriot Act, or when the Shrub threw FISA out the window. Hypocrisy from the neocon/birther/oather/teabagger cabal...Go figure.

Me, I'll wait and see if heads will roll at the ATF.

STY and azzhat have been consistent as far as i know

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

Yeah STY has been pretty consistent in calling out ALL unconstitutional authority the government deigns itself to have.

 

[Airstrip One]

Let's see: the gov't is tyrannical and rogue.....I wonder if that's regardless of what party is in power? I didn't read all this trash talk on the chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years. and there was total silence or grand support for the Patriot Act, or when the Shrub threw FISA out the window. Hypocrisy from the neocon/birther/oather/teabagger cabal...Go figure.

Me, I'll wait and see if heads will roll at the ATF.

How come you didn't visit any chat boards during the Bush years?

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

what is illegal for us and not the government....nuclear weapons...

We've been over this before Yurt.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Let's see: the gov't is tyrannical and rogue.....I wonder if that's regardless of what party is in power? I didn't read all this trash talk on the chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years. and there was total silence or grand support for the Patriot Act, or when the Shrub threw FISA out the window. Hypocrisy from the neocon/birther/oather/teabagger cabal...Go figure.

Me, I'll wait and see if heads will roll at the ATF.

you must have had a whole bunch of shit in your ears, because those of us who are both Libertarians and TEA party members railed against the Patriot act, TARP, and a whole bunch of other shit that both parties did, but don't let that spoil your liberal shit for brains ideology.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

We've been over this before Yurt.

i just wanted to win that one again

 

[SmarterthanYou]

what is illegal for us and not the government....nuclear weapons...

since the 2nd Amendment is the safeguard against government tyranny, if you have even an inkling that the gov would use a nuclear weapon against american citizens, then yes, tyranny because they deprive us of those weapons.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

since the 2nd Amendment is the safeguard against government tyranny, if you have even an inkling that the gov would use a nuclear weapon against american citizens, then yes, tyranny because they deprive us of those weapons.

if it came to that, i would suspect civil war

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

i just wanted to win that one again

Except you didn't win. As originally written the 2A protects the rights of citizens to own personal nuclear weapons. However, if you remember article 6, you'd remember that all treaties ratified are considered legal and go hand in hand with the constitution as far as legality and supremacy go. Therefore when we signed the several nuclear non-proliferation treaties we've signed, we've effectively ended the argument against civvies owning nukes.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Let's see: the gov't is tyrannical and rogue.....I wonder if that's regardless of what party is in power? I didn't read all this trash talk on the chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years. and there was total silence or grand support for the Patriot Act, or when the Shrub threw FISA out the window. Hypocrisy from the neocon/birther/oather/teabagger cabal...Go figure.

Me, I'll wait and see if heads will roll at the ATF.

How come you didn't visit any chat boards during the Bush years?

Think, my friend.....If I state that I didn't read such trash talk on chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years, what does that tell you? Hint: you had a father and his son respectively hold the office of presidency.

 

[Airstrip One]

Think, my friend.....If I state that I didn't read such trash talk on chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years, what does that tell you? Hint: you had a father and his son respectively hold the office of presidency.

Since there weren't any chat boards during the Reagan years, and the HTTP wasn't invented until 1991, I figured it would be irrelevant to speak of internet message boards during the Bush Sr. administration. You also don't have a sense of humour, so I figured you would not bother to throw up a statement like that just to be silly (i.e., I never saw supporters of Windell Wilkie speak ill of FDR on message boards). That leaves the Bush II years...

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

Think, my friend.....If I state that I didn't read such trash talk on chat boards during the Reagan/Bush years, what does that tell you? Hint: you had a father and his son respectively hold the office of presidency.

So in other words you weren't on the internet when STY was rallying against Bush. Cool.