the ATF has some 'splaining' to do

King of Guns said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
As I said to another joker, Libertarians are a bunch of two faced clowns....they get all pissed about one aspect of the Shrub and reaganomics when it directly effects them while wildly supporting the basis of that ideology.

And given his childish name calling, the King of Guns has yet to realize he's shooting intellectual blanks.
Click to expand...

So we're two faced because we have a different set of political ideology from Republicans, yet you're not because...why exactly?

The King of Guns shoots intellectual blanks again, still clicking the same empty chamber. Maybe I have to dumb it down for the King of Guns.....last time I checked, those labeled "liberals" and "progressives" and who belong to the Democratic party (save for "blue dogs") were NOT fans of reaganomics. Period. Meanwhile, libertarians sure as hell share the same idiotic belief with the neocons regarding reaganomics (privatization, little to no federal oversight or regulation, the fallacy of the "free market"). Now the fascinating thing about libertarians is their intellectual dishonesty....they never quite admit to anything that others logicly point out regarding their philosophy and such.

And once again Taidonthaveclueandamagigantichack, misses the point and insteads chooses to resort to 'clever' (I.E. Stupid) remarks like 'shooting blanks' and 'missing the target'. Great argument there buck-o. Real intellectual material.
Click to expand...

And like I said before, our intellectually bankrupt KOG just blathers childish, gain saying retorts.
 
King of Kings said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
....and those who do not learn the lessons of the past are condemned to repeat them. The sheer hypocrisy of the forementioned variations of "conservatism" when it comes to reaganomics, the Presidents that advocated such, and Obama is plain for all to see.
Click to expand...


Wow, when did libertarianism/classical liberalism become conservatism?
Click to expand...

Wow, who said it did? I didn't. Libertarianism is not "classical Liberalism" by any means (unless you ask some fool libertarian)....as I tried to explain to that fool the King of Guns....libertarians sure as hell share the same idiotic belief with the neocons regarding reaganomics (privatization, little to no federal oversight or regulation, the fallacy of the "free market"). Now the fascinating thing about libertarians is their intellectual dishonesty....they never quite admit to anything that others logicly point out regarding their philosophy and such. Carry on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
And like I said before, our intellectually bankrupt KOG just blathers childish, gain saying retorts.
Click to expand...
So Libertarians can't agree about some matters, say economics, and disagree about the whole 'social conservative/police state/international policeman' thing without being dishonest? So by that assertion, I, as a Libertarian, like air. You in turn must not like air.
 
Yup, Taicantseemtograspapointandmustflailaboutlikearetardedfishoutofwater can't seem to grasp that groups of people can share some ideas (little as necessary government regulation) while disagree on others (like corporate welfare or bailing out failing businesses) and totally despising some others (like social conservatism or liberal nanny-stateism). Only two choices in life apparently.
 
King of Guns said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
And like I said before, our intellectually bankrupt KOG just blathers childish, gain saying retorts.
Click to expand...

So Libertarians can't agree about some matters, say economics, and disagree about the whole 'social conservative/police state/international policeman' thing without being dishonest? So by that assertion, I, as a Libertarian, like air. You in turn must not like air.
Click to expand...

The King of Guns just keeps pulling the trigger on empty chambers....pity the KOG doesn't have the intellectual honesty to deal with previous points I made...instead, the KOG just dodges and dances, creating his own little revisionist world as to what the chronology of the posts actually contain regarding my responses.

I'm done with this Libertarian asshole...if indeed the KOG is even that.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-has-some-splaining-to-do&p=804468#post804468
 
Taichiliberal said:
The King of Guns just keeps pulling the trigger on empty chambers....pity the KOG doesn't have the intellectual honesty to deal with previous points I made...instead, the KOG just dodges and dances, creating his own little revisionist world as to what the chronology of the posts actually contain regarding my responses.

I'm done with this Libertarian asshole...if indeed the KOG is even that.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-has-some-splaining-to-do&p=804468#post804468
Click to expand...
Please, do elaborate the revisionism here. Libertarians like free market principles. Some conservatives like free market principles. That does not make it intellectually dishonest to disagree about anything else that Libertarians do not like about conservatives.

Seriously, you haven't made a single point, other than parroting why I have already said. Yes Libertarians share some economic ideas with Republicans. Big fucking deal.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Actually, the chronology of the posts just shows you to be a childish, boorish jackass with no intellectual honesty. No point in me wasting time with you.
Click to expand...

the irony, it burns.
Click to expand...

And yet our self deluded STY is STILL following me around spewing sour grapes. Seems my kicking his "Smarter Than You" ass in a debate just grinds his gears to no end.....but yet he can't put me on IA.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-has-some-splaining-to-do&p=804096#post804096

You're a joke, STY. Let me know when you've got the stones and brains to debate someone who disagrees with you honestly (and spare us all the predictable editing my post for a "I know you are, but what am I" retort...I mean, be original and grow up, STY).
 
Taichiliberal said:
And yet our self deluded STY is STILL following me around spewing sour grapes. Seems my kicking his "Smarter Than You" ass in a debate just grinds his gears to no end.....but yet he can't put me on IA.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-has-some-splaining-to-do&p=804096#post804096

You're a joke, STY. Let me know when you've got the stones and brains to debate someone who disagrees with you honestly (and spare us all the predictable editing my post for a "I know you are, but what am I" retort...I mean, be original and grow up, STY).
Click to expand...
Posting the same thing over and over again doesn't make you right. It makes you dumb.
 
Taichiliberal said:
And yet our self deluded STY is STILL following me around spewing sour grapes. Seems my kicking his "Smarter Than You" ass in a debate just grinds his gears to no end.....but yet he can't put me on IA.
Click to expand...
you couldn't kick an ass if you were surrounded by donkeys.

Taichiliberal said:
You're a joke, STY. Let me know when you've got the stones and brains to debate someone who disagrees with you honestly (and spare us all the predictable editing my post for a "I know you are, but what am I" retort...I mean, be original and grow up, STY).
Click to expand...
look who's the fucking joke. that would be you. you've been slammed by nearly everyone on this board at some point or another. The only things that come from your posts is chronology and every name under the sun for someone not a liberal or 'progressive'. seriously, you've turned in to a laughingstock like jarod.
 
King of Guns said:
Please, do elaborate the revisionism here. Libertarians like free market principles. Some conservatives like free market principles. That does not make it intellectually dishonest to disagree about anything else that Libertarians do not like about conservatives.

Seriously, you haven't made a single point, other than parroting why I have already said. Yes Libertarians share some economic ideas with Republicans. Big fucking deal.
Click to expand...

But dems repubs and libertarians all agree with the insane principles of internationalist fascism, know more popularly as "free trade".
 
SmarterThanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
And yet our self deluded STY is STILL following me around spewing sour grapes. Seems my kicking his "Smarter Than You" ass in a debate just grinds his gears to no end.....but yet he can't put me on IA.
Click to expand...

you couldn't kick an ass if you were surrounded by donkeys.

Wow....what a schoolyard come back from the clown that claims to be "Smarter Than You", how shall I stand the strain! I guess STY is obsessed with me and will following me around forever to state that I'm not worth responding to and such! :o

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
You're a joke, STY. Let me know when you've got the stones and brains to debate someone who disagrees with you honestly (and spare us all the predictable editing my post for a "I know you are, but what am I" retort...I mean, be original and grow up, STY).
Click to expand...

look who's the fucking joke. that would be you. you've been slammed by nearly everyone on this board at some point or another. The only things that come from your posts is chronology and every name under the sun for someone not a liberal or 'progressive'. seriously, you've turned in to a laughingstock like jarod.
Click to expand...

And as we can see folks, the fool that claims to be "Smarter Than You" just deteriorates into a petulant child with a grudge. STY little diatribe here strategically ignores the content of the post I linked ...a testament to STY's intellectual cowardice/bankruptcy.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-has-some-splaining-to-do&p=804468#post804468

The reason why the phrase "chronology of the posts" burns the asses of fools like STY is that I use it for the reader to follow the origin of the statements and responses of an exchange in order to see if the latest claims by fools like STY are valid. Truth in print is like sunlight to a vampire for STY and his like minded cohorts.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:

The reason why the phrase "chronology of the posts" burns the asses of fools like STY is that I use it for the reader to follow the origin of the statements and responses of an exchange in order to see if the latest claims by fools like STY are valid. Truth in print is like sunlight to a vampire for STY and his like minded cohorts.
Click to expand...
ROFL, more retarded comments from mr. chronology. keep up the good work looking like a moron.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal

The reason why the phrase "chronology of the posts" burns the asses of fools like STY is that I use it for the reader to follow the origin of the statements and responses of an exchange in order to see if the latest claims by fools like STY are valid. Truth in print is like sunlight to a vampire for STY and his like minded cohorts.
Click to expand...

ROFL, more retarded comments from mr. chronology. keep up the good work looking like a moron.
Click to expand...

Ahh, the expected childish retort from our intellectually bankrupt STY.

This is why STY is so bitchy, folks:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-has-some-splaining-to-do&p=804096#post804096

Outside of this, STY really has nothing to say to me on the subject thread title.....but the last word is very important to STY, no matter how useless and immature. I'll leave him to it.
 
Last edited:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/apr/29/obamas-gunrunning-hypocrisy/

The Obama administration on Friday renewed its proposal to force gun dealers in four southwest border states to register multiple firearms sales. According to its filing in the Federal Register, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) wants to create detailed records of whenever anyone attempts to purchase more than one semi-automatic rifle in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas. The registry scheme highlights Department of Justice (DOJ) hypocrisy on the gun issue.

DOJ claims information on law-abiding gun owners might help prevent Mexican drug cartels from obtaining American weapons. At the same time, DOJ and ATF are actively resisting a subpoena from a congressional committee demanding information regarding the ATF’s own role in promoting actual sales of guns to drug lords. One of these weapons was reportedly used in a December ambush that claimed the life of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. To date, Justice has allowed House Oversight and Government Reform staff to view a handful of redacted papers, but an April 8 letter from DOJ’s legislative affairs office claimed the rest of the material was confidential and wouldn’t be released because it was related to ongoing criminal investigations.

Lawmakers are far from satisfied. “They have not complied with the terms of the subpoena,” committee spokesman Becca Watkins told The Washington Times. “We’ve basically been stonewalled.” The committee sent its own team of investigators to Arizona to look into the matter directly, and their findings are likely to guide the response to DOJ’s recalcitrance.

The committee and Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Iowa Republican, want to know the genesis of ATF’s “Project Gunrunner” where straw buyers were intentionally allowed to make illegal gun purchases in the United States and smuggle the items into Mexico. ATF wanted to follow the guns to the cartel leadership, but this usually meant finding the guns after they had been used in a crime. Gun-store owners suspicious about certain sales were apparently told by the feds to proceed.

The Obama administration’s position in effect is that nobody can investigate the Justice Department - not even Congress. The public is supposed to believe an internal review will make an honest determination of whether the gunrunning scheme was a good idea or not. Instead of providing transparency, the White House is exploiting the Mexican gun issue for political purposes. “We’re also doing more to stem the southbound flow of guns into the region,” President Obama said in Santiago, Chile, on March 21. “We’re seizing many more guns bound for Mexico and we’re putting more gunrunners behind bars. And every gun or gunrunner that we take off the streets is one less threat to the families and communities of the Americas.”
Click to expand...

funny, they are doing more to stem the flow, one that they created.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top