GOP conservatives accuse Obama of illegal action

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
In a challenge to President Barack Obama's handling of the conflict in Libya, a group of US senators accused him Wednesday of violating a 1973 law aimed at curtailing the White House's war powers.



Conservative Republicans Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, Tom Coburn, and John Cornyn wrote a letter to Obama charging that he had committed US forces "without regard to, or compliance with" the War Powers Act.



The senators pressed Obama to say whether he would abide by a requirement in the law -- ignored by several US presidents -- that US forces start withdrawing from a conflict within 60 days unless explicitly authorized by the Congress.



"Friday is the final day of the statutory sixty day period for you to terminate the use of the United States Armed Forces in Libya under the War Powers Resolution," the lawmakers said in their letter.



"Last week some in your administration indicated use of the United States Armed Forces will continue indefinitely, while others said you would act in a manner consistent with the War Powers Resolution," they said.



"Therefore, we are writing to ask whether you intend to comply with the requirements of the War Powers Resolution. We await your response."



The US Constitution reserves to Congress the right to declare war, though US presidents have often sent forces into combat without first getting lawmakers' explicit say-so, despite the War Powers Act.



The law allows the president to use force in response to an attack on the United States, its territories, or its armed forces, but calls for notifying Congress within 48 hours and says US troops must start to withdraw 60 days later unless specifically authorized to remain by lawmakers.



The act says such a withdrawal can last 30 days.



Earlier, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates sidestepped a reporter's question on whether the administration would ignore the law or whether it would affect US operations in support of the NATO-led, UN-backed mission.



"The War Powers Act question is above my pay grade, and so I would refer you to the White House," he said.











Beach_Impeach_03.jpeg







http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...ocId=CNG.f5e2c7cf7dab768ddebff16d291d1def.3a1
 
Interesting that you would use an image from a liberal war-protest site to blame "conservatives" for suggesting something...

A great quote from that site:

I last updated this site on 7.24.08 and since then, much has happened, much of it good and fitting but, sadly, much remains the same. While I rejoiced in Barack Obama's electoral victory from the standpoint of a statement on racial progress in America (and no, we are anything but "post-racial"), I was unable to vote for his predictable corporate Democratic Party agenda, prefering instead Ralph Nader's truly progressive platform.

You should change your thread title.
 
Interesting that you would use an image from a liberal war-protest site to blame "conservatives" for suggesting something...

A great quote from that site:I last updated this site on 7.24.08 and since then, much has happened, much of it good and fitting but, sadly, much remains the same. While I rejoiced in Barack Obama's electoral victory from the standpoint of a statement on racial progress in America (and no, we are anything but "post-racial"), I was unable to vote for his predictable corporate Democratic Party agenda, prefering instead Ralph Nader's truly progressive platform.


You should change your thread title.

Why?

If any president commits troops illegally, I'm all in favor of taking appropriate action.

Are you?
 
Why?

If any president commits troops illegally, I'm all in favor of taking appropriate action.

Are you?

It depends on what you think is "illegal"? This particular site ignores that the Congress authorized action in Iraq and Afghanistan and pretends that it is impeachable. It was created against Bush, and continued as Obama continued those wars.

Your site to "impeach" with the neat picture above was created against wars which have had a vote in Congress.

Do you have a site with actual "conservatives" rather than a lefty group calling for impeachment currently? That would make your title accurate. So far you've given me a radical leftist group who thinks action in Afghanistan and Iraq is somehow "impeachable"...
 
In a challenge to President Barack Obama's handling of the conflict in Libya, a group of US senators accused him Wednesday of violating a 1973 law aimed at curtailing the White House's war powers.



Conservative Republicans Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, Tom Coburn, and John Cornyn wrote a letter to Obama charging that he had committed US forces "without regard to, or compliance with" the War Powers Act.



The senators pressed Obama to say whether he would abide by a requirement in the law -- ignored by several US presidents -- that US forces start withdrawing from a conflict within 60 days unless explicitly authorized by the Congress.



"Friday is the final day of the statutory sixty day period for you to terminate the use of the United States Armed Forces in Libya under the War Powers Resolution," the lawmakers said in their letter.



"Last week some in your administration indicated use of the United States Armed Forces will continue indefinitely, while others said you would act in a manner consistent with the War Powers Resolution," they said.



"Therefore, we are writing to ask whether you intend to comply with the requirements of the War Powers Resolution. We await your response."



The US Constitution reserves to Congress the right to declare war, though US presidents have often sent forces into combat without first getting lawmakers' explicit say-so, despite the War Powers Act.



The law allows the president to use force in response to an attack on the United States, its territories, or its armed forces, but calls for notifying Congress within 48 hours and says US troops must start to withdraw 60 days later unless specifically authorized to remain by lawmakers.



The act says such a withdrawal can last 30 days.



Earlier, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates sidestepped a reporter's question on whether the administration would ignore the law or whether it would affect US operations in support of the NATO-led, UN-backed mission.



"The War Powers Act question is above my pay grade, and so I would refer you to the White House," he said.











Beach_Impeach_03.jpeg







http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...ocId=CNG.f5e2c7cf7dab768ddebff16d291d1def.3a1

does fulfilling our obligations to NATO and/or the UN require congressional approval since there are treaties in effect
 
It depends on what you think is "illegal"? This particular site ignores that the Congress authorized action in Iraq and Afghanistan and pretends that it is impeachable. It was created against Bush, and continued as Obama continued those wars.

Your site to "impeach" with the neat picture above was created against wars which have had a vote in Congress.

Do you have a site with actual "conservatives" rather than a lefty group calling for impeachment currently? That would make your title accurate. So far you've given me a radical leftist group who thinks action in Afghanistan and Iraq is somehow "impeachable"...


Are you denying that Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, Tom Coburn, and John Cornyn are conservative Republicans who accused Obama of illegality?

Nice attempt at distraction re: the picture.

FYI I didn't even look at the site it came from. Does using an image from a site mean the poster agrees with everything on the site that hosts the image?
 
Are you denying that Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson, Tom Coburn, and John Cornyn are conservative Republicans who accused Obama of illegality?

Nice attempt at distraction re: the picture.

FYI I didn't even look at the site it came from. Does using an image from a site mean the poster agrees with everything on the site that hosts the image?

I'm saying that there is no current movement by any of them to actually impeach the President. Hyperbole notwithstanding the only images you could find weren't even from conservative sites. That's pretty pitiful.
 
I'm saying that there is no current movement by any of them to actually impeach the President. Hyperbole notwithstanding the only images you could find weren't even from conservative sites. That's pretty pitiful.

Are these more to your Buddhist-birther-curious liking?



impeach-obama585x450.jpg
Impeach+Obama+sign+p1.jpg
impeach-obama-sestak.jpg
impeach-obama1.png
 
Back
Top