4 More Years! President Obama Signs Four Year Extension of Patriot Act

That was my biggest fear is that when the Yellow Bellied Coward Act was put into law by little weak sisters who are afraid of their own fucking shadow that no politician would have the balls to get rid of it cause they'd be considered weak on terrorism. Fucking pussies....all of them!
 
Obama voted for it when he was in the Senate. Why would he not sign it now? If you're surprised by this you just weren't paying attention.
 
You've heard of devil with the blue dress on.....

meet

GW with the black skin on......:lol:
 
9-11 changed everything. The battle cry of the great american chicken. You will not hear many libs decry this either because they don't want to be called weak on terrorism. If'n yer not fer us yer agin us. We the sheeple in order to form a more perfect slaughter line, establish big government, instill domestic fear, provide for a stronger police state and promote a general feeling of unease, do ordain and establish this overreaching peace of big brother bullshit. A pox on the left and the right.
 
Socrtease said:
9-11 changed everything. The battle cry of the great american chicken. You will not hear many libs decry this either because they don't want to be called weak on terrorism. If'n yer not fer us yer agin us. We the sheeple in order to form a more perfect slaughter line, establish big government, instill domestic fear, provide for a stronger police state and promote a general feeling of unease, do ordain and establish this overreaching peace of big brother bullshit. A pox on the left and the right.
Click to expand...

wow dude....you've become a pinhead in no time at all.....
9/11 changed everything ?...You're god damn right it did....3000 innocent civilians were murdered by the barbaric fanatics from the Middle East shouting Ala Akbar....2 skyscrapers collapsed in the middle of New York City.....the cost of this terrorism to our economy was in the billions of dollars....
You think that should NOT change things.....????
You think that being weak on terrorists is right move ????
You think that people that are not for us are friends of ours....???
You think that those that refuse to actively help us are allys ????
You think we should not be fearful of terrorists ????

Is your brain actually functional in a real sense...?????
 
St. Vitus' Dance said:
9-11 changed everything. The battle cry of the great american chicken. You will not hear many libs decry this either because they don't want to be called weak on terrorism. If'n yer not fer us yer agin us. We the sheeple in order to form a more perfect slaughter line, establish big government, instill domestic fear, provide for a stronger police state and promote a general feeling of unease, do ordain and establish this overreaching peace of big brother bullshit. A pox on the left and the right.
Click to expand...

9/11 did change the face of national security-it just did. The previous model of what to do would NEVER HAVE FLOWN with liberals...NEVER! That model would have been to round up all foreign nationals from around the country who came from states that sponsor or harbor terrorists and either deport or put them in detainment camps. THAT WAS HOW WE CONSTITUTIONALLY handled foreign threats before 9/11! Would you have supported that instead of the P.A.?
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
wow dude....you've become a pinhead in no time at all.....
9/11 changed everything ?...You're god damn right it did....3000 innocent civilians were murdered by the barbaric fanatics from the Middle East shouting Ala Akbar....2 skyscrapers collapsed in the middle of New York City.....the cost of this terrorism to our economy was in the billions of dollars....
You think that should NOT change things.....????
You think that being weak on terrorists is right move ????
You think that people that are not for us are friends of ours....???
You think that those that refuse to actively help us are allys ????
You think we should not be fearful of terrorists ????

Is your brain actually functional in a real sense...?????
Click to expand...

The attacks were INTENDED to cause fear. A by product of that fear is that the government in response cracks down on freedoms, but morons of your ilk are fine with that. Better to feel safe than be free huh? Not me, not the men that founded this country. Franklin was right, you deserve neither safety, nor liberty. You are a sheep. Osama bin Laden could never imagine how successful his attacks would be on that day, not only did he kill over 3000 people, but he got people like you to willingly give up their freedoms.
 
St. Vitus' Dance said:
The attacks were INTENDED to cause fear. A by product of that fear is that the government in response cracks down on freedoms, but morons of your ilk are fine with that. Better to feel safe than be free huh? Not me, not the men that founded this country. Franklin was right, you deserve neither safety, nor liberty. You are a sheep. Osama bin Laden could never imagine how successful his attacks would be on that day, not only did he kill over 3000 people, but he got people like you to willingly give up their freedoms.
Click to expand...

Well said sir. Again I say well said.
 
St. Vitus' Dance said:
The attacks were INTENDED to cause fear. A by product of that fear is that the government in response cracks down on freedoms, but morons of your ilk are fine with that. Better to feel safe than be free huh? Not me, not the men that founded this country. Franklin was right, you deserve neither safety, nor liberty. You are a sheep. Osama bin Laden could never imagine how successful his attacks would be on that day, not only did he kill over 3000 people, but he got people like you to willingly give up their freedoms.
Click to expand...

Again, what would your position have been had the US responded to the attacks based on the previous model of national security responses to a domestic attack? I was never a fan of the P.A. -I did however understand 9/11 changed the face of national security-it just did. The previous model of what to do would NEVER HAVE FLOWN with liberals...NEVER! That model would have been to round up all foreign nationals from around the country who came from states that sponsor or harbor terrorists and either deport or put them in detainment camps. THAT WAS HOW WE CONSTITUTIONALLY handled foreign threats before 9/11! Would you have supported that instead of the P.A.?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top