Underground Website Lets You Buy Any Drug Imaginable

Of all the posts, of all the rubbish, of all the flaming posts ... THIS post and poster should be banned.
The website is breaking the law and in many countries (I dont know about the US) the poster is breaking the law.
 
Of all the posts, of all the rubbish, of all the flaming posts ... THIS post and poster should be banned.
The website is breaking the law and in many countries (I dont know about the US) the poster is breaking the law.

So you support restictions on the freedom of speech.
 
Of all the posts, of all the rubbish, of all the flaming posts ... THIS post and poster should be banned.
The website is breaking the law and in many countries (I dont know about the US) the poster is breaking the law.

Surely you jest, as I find it difficult to believe you could be that stupid. Linking to an article does not break the law, at least in the United States it doesn't. Besides, Wired is a reputable publication. The reason I posted the article is to demonstrate that the war on drugs cannot be won. It is an insane, futile effort that must be brought to an end.
 
Surely you jest, as I find it difficult to believe you could be that stupid. Linking to an article does not break the law, at least in the United States it doesn't. Besides, Wired is a reputable publication. The reason I posted the article is to demonstrate that the war on drugs cannot be won. It is an insane, futile effort that must be brought to an end.

It is not for you to say the war on drugs cannot be won unless it is simply an opinion. To post details of a seller of illegal substances is, in itself, irresponsible if not illegal.
However I am not surprised that this should be done by an American. A citizen of one of the most hypocritical nations on the planet. Drugs, porn, guns - and the most ridiculous thing of all is that people like you bemoan the fact that your country is heading for the sewer and have the cheek to blame politicians.
You may support the legalisation of drugs but at this time drugs are not legal. You are therefore encouraging people to break the law.
 
It is not for you to say the war on drugs cannot be won unless it is simply an opinion. To post details of a seller of illegal substances is, in itself, irresponsible if not illegal.
However I am not surprised that this should be done by an American. A citizen of one of the most hypocritical nations on the planet. Drugs, porn, guns - and the most ridiculous thing of all is that people like you bemoan the fact that your country is heading for the sewer and have the cheek to blame politicians.
You may support the legalisation of drugs but at this time drugs are not legal. You are therefore encouraging people to break the law.

Wow, I guess you are that stupid. It is now evident to me why people call you LowIQ. And no, it's not an opinion, it's a fact. Even proponents of the war on drugs admit it cannot be won. There will never be a day when drugs are not sold illegally.

If you feel the information on Wired is illegal, you're welcome to report it.
 
Wow, I guess you are that stupid. It is now evident to me why people call you LowIQ. And no, it's not an opinion, it's a fact. Even proponents of the war on drugs admit it cannot be won. There will never be a day when drugs are not sold illegally.

If you feel the information on Wired is illegal, you're welcome to report it.

Once again I feel happy at not being an American. You must lead a sad and unfulfilled life if you have to rely on drugs. You must also be pretty immature. You seem to be proud of breaking the law. Very strange.
 
Once again I feel happy at not being an American. You must lead a sad and unfulfilled life if you have to rely on drugs. You must also be pretty immature. You seem to be proud of breaking the law. Very strange.

Nice theory asshole, but the fact of the matter is, I've never taken illegal drugs in my life. Where have I broken the law?

Really, get help.
 
Of all the posts, of all the rubbish, of all the flaming posts ... THIS post and poster should be banned.
The website is breaking the law and in many countries (I dont know about the US) the poster is breaking the law.

F R E E D O M - governments hate it
 
Nice theory asshole, but the fact of the matter is, I've never taken illegal drugs in my life. Where have I broken the law?

Really, get help.

Is there anything about being a mature, law abiding member of society that you DO like?
If the law on drugs is, in your opinion, wrong, then what about the law on murder? Oh, of course its not the same is it? The law on murder is designed to stop people killing other people, while the law on drugs is ... ohhh yes. D'you like Mexico and Columbia as holiday destinations?
 
i wonder how long this will last

there is a bit of anarchism left in this old dog that loves this

the war on drugs sucks and i wonder how many taxpayer dollars will be spent tracking down this site and trying to close it

why would the government close it......it's much easier to use it to compile a list of people who think the internet is anonymous.......
 
Is there anything about being a mature, law abiding member of society that you DO like?
If the law on drugs is, in your opinion, wrong, then what about the law on murder? Oh, of course its not the same is it? The law on murder is designed to stop people killing other people, while the law on drugs is ... ohhh yes. D'you like Mexico and Columbia as holiday destinations?

Under the pressure of the cares and sorrows of our mortal condition, men have at all times, and in all countries, called in some physical aid to their moral consolations - wine, beer, opium, brandy, or tobacco.
Edmund Burke

Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny.
Edmund Burke

Connect the dots Lowaicue...

US_incarceration_timeline.gif
Incarceration_rates_worldwide.gif


Nixon Tapes Reveal Twisted Roots Of Marijuana Prohibition

White House Conversations Reveal Prejudices, Culture War Behind Nixon's Drug War


Washington, DC: "We need, and I use the word 'all out war,' or all fronts . . . ." That was Richard Nixon's reaction to his national commission's recommendation that marijuana no longer be a criminal offense, according to Nixon's Oval Office tapes. The year after Nixon's "all out war" marijuana arrests jumped by over 100,000 people.

Highlights of Nixon comments on marijuana:

* Jews and marijuana: "I see another thing in the news summary this morning about it. That's a funny thing, every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish. What the Christ is the matter with the Jews, Bob, what is the matter with them? I suppose it's because most of them are psychiatrists . . ."

* Marijuana and the culture wars: "You see, homosexuality, dope, immorality in general. These are the enemies of strong societies. That's why the Communists and the left-wingers are pushing the stuff, they're trying to destroy us."

* Marijuana compared to alcohol: marijuana consumers smoke "to get high" while "a person drinks to have fun." Nixon also saw marijuana leading to loss of motivation and discipline but claimed: "At least with liquor I don't lose motivation."

* Marijuana and political dissent: ". . . radical demonstrators that were here . . . two weeks ago . . . They're all on drugs, virtually all."

* Drug education: "Enforce the law, you’ve got to scare them."
 
Hell, lowaicue you are just plain off base on this one. Odd to me, since I usualy agree with your points.

Here is the U.S. if we disagree with the law, we don't just say, hey that's the freaking law, live with it. We try to change the law, whether through legislation, lobbying, activisim, commentary or civil disobediance. The battle to end the war on drugs has been a long and costly one, and is finaly nearing fruition (hopefully). It is disapointing to me that one as bright as yourself is completely unaware of this. Additionaly, your acusation of criminality by the OP is entirely false.
 
Hell, lowaicue you are just plain off base on this one. Odd to me, since I usualy agree with your points.

Here is the U.S. if we disagree with the law, we don't just say, hey that's the freaking law, live with it. We try to change the law, whether through legislation, lobbying, activisim, commentary or civil disobediance. The battle to end the war on drugs has been a long and costly one, and is finaly nearing fruition (hopefully). It is disapointing to me that one as bright as yourself is completely unaware of this. Additionaly, your acusation of criminality by the OP is entirely false.

What I am saying is that while the law is in place it should be upheld and obeyed for the sake of society in general. To change a bad law you use the ballot box, debate, argument, persuasion. You don't simply and mindlessly disobey.
What would become of society if people just took it into their own heads to disobey laws with which they did not agree? Scrap speed limits because we all drive better at 80 than we do at 30? Scrap drink driving laws because as we all agree we drive better with a few beers inside us.
No, if we choose community living, and we all do save for one or two hermits, we should respect those with whom we share. Many laws are chaged, many go out of favour, many become unworkable. It is the job of our legislators to change the laws to which we have agreed to abide.
 
What I am saying is that while the law is in place it should be upheld and obeyed for the sake of society in general. To change a bad law you use the ballot box, debate, argument, persuasion. You don't simply and mindlessly disobey.
What would become of society if people just took it into their own heads to disobey laws with which they did not agree? Scrap speed limits because we all drive better at 80 than we do at 30? Scrap drink driving laws because as we all agree we drive better with a few beers inside us.
No, if we choose community living, and we all do save for one or two hermits, we should respect those with whom we share. Many laws are chaged, many go out of favour, many become unworkable. It is the job of our legislators to change the laws to which we have agreed to abide.

What don't you understand? United States has 5 percent of the world's population and 25 percent of the world's incarcerated population.

People crushed by laws, have no hope but to evade power. If the laws are their enemies, they will be enemies to the law; and those who have most to hope and nothing to lose will always be dangerous.
Edmund Burke
 
It is not for you to say the war on drugs cannot be won unless it is simply an opinion.
history has shown his 'opinion' to be factually true, case in point is prohibition.

To post details of a seller of illegal substances is, in itself, irresponsible if not illegal.
However I am not surprised that this should be done by an American. A citizen of one of the most hypocritical nations on the planet. Drugs, porn, guns - and the most ridiculous thing of all is that people like you bemoan the fact that your country is heading for the sewer and have the cheek to blame politicians.
You may support the legalisation of drugs but at this time drugs are not legal. You are therefore encouraging people to break the law.

If a written law clearly violates the constitution, one may ignore the law at will.
 
What I am saying is that while the law is in place it should be upheld and obeyed for the sake of society in general. To change a bad law you use the ballot box, debate, argument, persuasion. You don't simply and mindlessly disobey.
What would become of society if people just took it into their own heads to disobey laws with which they did not agree? Scrap speed limits because we all drive better at 80 than we do at 30? Scrap drink driving laws because as we all agree we drive better with a few beers inside us.
No, if we choose community living, and we all do save for one or two hermits, we should respect those with whom we share. Many laws are chaged, many go out of favour, many become unworkable. It is the job of our legislators to change the laws to which we have agreed to abide.

Sorry pal but that is not the thoughtful response I have come to expect from you.

The war on drugs is an unbearably expensive failure, imprisoning some men for 20 years for possession of a partial weed fag. Disproportionately, these men are black and fathers. this is just one sliver of the tentacles of this unjust war which benefits none justly. At this time our legislators are and represent oligarchy, not the will of and what is best for the people.

Your veiw of this is as simplistic as Dixie's general political outlook.
 
Sorry pal but that is not the thoughtful response I have come to expect from you.

The war on drugs is an unbearably expensive failure, imprisoning some men for 20 years for possession of a partial weed fag. Disproportionately, these men are black and fathers. this is just one sliver of the tentacles of this unjust war which benefits none justly. At this time our legislators are and represent oligarchy, not the will of and what is best for the people.

Your veiw of this is as simplistic as Dixie's general political outlook.

What I am most disappointed with Obama about is his non-liberal views on the draconian drug laws.
 
Back
Top