The Clarence Thomas Follies!

[Onceler]

and as usual you dishonestly claim someone said something when they didn't. this is what you do with everyone, when you lose, you merely claim that the other person has admitted they're right (which they never do), then you claim they admit they are a fool, dumb buffon...(which they never do)

if you only did this once in a while, it would be funny, but you do it all the time whenever you get into these stupid little nonsense spats you dream up. our posts are not the same at all. good lord onceler, what is your problem? i honestly can't believe you're still stuck on yesterday and trying to make a correlation, it is truly bizarre.

But you did admit it. I used "righties" in a response to the OP, and you used "lefties." There is virtually no difference, but you made a great deal of hay about my use of "righties" for some reason.

Unless we're to believe your adament contention that your 1st response on this thread was NOT a response to the OP, and was just random posting, on a random thread that you chose.

It's pretty funny.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

But you did admit it. I used "righties" in a response to the OP, and you used "lefties." There is virtually no difference, but you made a great deal of hay about my use of "righties" for some reason.

Unless we're to believe your adament contention that your 1st response on this thread was NOT a response to the OP, and was just random posting, on a random thread that you chose.

It's pretty funny.

whatever onceler...i did not admit anything and certainly did not admit to anything you claim. my contention is our posts are not related, not even remotely. seriously, wtf are you still on this? i know you were humiliated in that thread, but why subject us to the continual humiliation by bringing up in another thread? let - it - go.

 

[Onceler]

whatever onceler...i did not admit anything and certainly did not admit to anything you claim. my contention is our posts are not related, not even remotely. seriously, wtf are you still on this? i know you were humiliated in that thread, but why subject us to the continual humiliation by bringing up in another thread? let - it - go.

But I wasn't humiliated, at all. I used "righties" the same way you used "lefties", exactly. This is your usual m.o. - make a dumb comment without thinking (or reading properly), and then scramble & parse to try to back it up, all the while implying that the other poster is an idiot for not understanding your scrambling & parsing. And then you do the same thing you criticized on another thread a few minutes later.

It's actually pretty hilarious. I hope you realize it, but sometimes worry that you don't.

Just answer this with a simple yes or no (I'm betting that you won't, because the question terrifies you): was your 1st response on this thread a response to the OP?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

But I wasn't humiliated, at all. I used "righties" the same way you used "lefties", exactly. This is your usual m.o. - make a dumb comment without thinking (or reading properly), and then scramble & parse to try to back it up, all the while implying that the other poster is an idiot for not understanding your scrambling & parsing. And then you do the same thing you criticized on another thread a few minutes later.

It's actually pretty hilarious. I hope you realize it, but sometimes worry that you don't.

Just answer this with a simple yes or no (I'm betting that you won't, because the question terrifies you): was your 1st response on this thread a response to the OP?

good fucking lord onceler...i've answered that question multiple times and i thought you finally figured it out and you didn't correct me, so now, X posts later, you're still stuck on this...no wonder the rest of your post doesn't make sense....you're literally insane, i can't believe you're wasting so much time on such a simple issue. the answer is clear as day to anyone except you. moron.

since you're too dumb to figure it out -- did i say my response was to the OP? something you're too fucking stupid to answer. i truly hope your feeble brain can figure out.

NO

 

[Onceler]

LOL

So what you're saying is that your 1st post on this thread was a random post, on a thread that you picked randomly.

Thanks; that really clears things up.....

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

LOL

So what you're saying is that your 1st post on this thread was a random post, on a thread that you picked randomly.

Thanks; that really clears things up.....

sheeesh

i never said that, this is just more of you LYING about what people say

go away

 

[Onceler]

sheeesh

i never said that, this is just more of you LYING about what people say

go away

You were either responding to the OP, or posting randomly. There really isn't another option. You have now stated that you were NOT responding to the OP.

Ergo - you were posting randomly, on a thread that you just randomly chose. Sorry 'bout that...

 

[Airstrip One]

Bloody awesome conversation you chaps are having here. Spot on, I say!! I would just like to interject one crucial point (or perhaps two, I should say?) which is being omitted by both parties.

TITTIES!!


Carry on, then...

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
At LEAST Holder could go after the wife with all this evidence....but somehow I doubt if he or Obama will have the stones to do so.

BWAHAHAHAHA

holder is currently sitting right next to the hot seat on this ATF scandal, you think he's gonna rock the boat on the courts??????

Doing his job wouldn't be rocking the boat.......but is seems Mr. Holder has been taking heat from both the right and the left. If he was doing an objectively good job, that would be all right...but he's basically ineffective on some issues that pisses everyone off.

 

[Annie]

The DOJ has all the credibility of the KKK. Total discredited.

 

[Taichiliberal]

I don't think Holder has any authority to do anything. I doubt that any criminal laws were violated. Impeachment is the only option (considering Thomas lacks the integrity to resign over the scandal) and that's a non-starter.

Well, not quite. Essentially, the evidence brings out tax evasion and serious conflict of interest regarding Thomas ability to rule fairly on certain cases. This does fall under Holder's jurisdiction to at least do a preliminary investigation. I agree that Thomas getting impeached with a GOP majority in Congress is a slim chance, but with damning evidence it is possible, as it has been done in SCOTUS history before.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Almost 20 years of Thomas cheating the system and your only response is to play the

Yurt's an babbling neocon idiot, which is why I have him on IA. If you ignore him, he becomes just a tag-a-long "groan" artist like some other idiots we see.

 

[Taichiliberal]

The DOJ has all the credibility of the KKK. Total discredited.

Did you actually READ the article, or did you just knee-jerk this response, Annie?

Let us know what's your opinion regarding Thomas and his wife's actions when you get up to speed, Annie.

 

[Airstrip One]

Well, not quite. Essentially, the evidence brings out tax evasion and serious conflict of interest regarding Thomas ability to rule fairly on certain cases. This does fall under Holder's jurisdiction to at least do a preliminary investigation. I agree that Thomas getting impeached with a GOP majority in Congress is a slim chance, but with damning evidence it is possible, as it has been done in SCOTUS history before.

I don't believe Samuel Chase was even impeached, if that's what you're referring to...

 

[Airstrip One]

Okay, so a quick Wiki search shows that he was impeached but acquited by the Senate. I think he was only really targeted because he slowly abandoned the radical state's righters and became a staunch Federalist, which was probably viewed by the emotionally-challenged Jeffersonians as the greatest of political betrayals...

 

[Onceler]

You were either responding to the OP, or posting randomly. There really isn't another option. You have now stated that you were NOT responding to the OP.

Ergo - you were posting randomly, on a thread that you just randomly chose. Sorry 'bout that...

Why are you sprinting away from this one, btw?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

and not surprisingly, onceler is still OBSESSING over this DAYS later. let it go, you made a fool of yourself, accept it and move on. i have.

 

[Onceler]

and not surprisingly, onceler is still OBSESSING over this DAYS later. let it go, you made a fool of yourself, accept it and move on. i have.

Not obsessing; just waiting for you to admit you were wrong. Why would I bail before that?

Now, stop sprinting & fess up...

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Not obsessing; just waiting for you to admit you were wrong. Why would I bail before that?

Now, stop sprinting & fess up...

why would i admit i'm wrong when i am not wrong. you made a complete fool out of yourself.

do keep waiting and obsessing though...at least it gives you something do

 

[Onceler]

why would i admit i'm wrong when i am not wrong. you made a complete fool out of yourself.

do keep waiting and obsessing though...at least it gives you something do

If I made a fool of myself, then so did you. I used righties the exact same way you used lefties; we have now established that.

So, admit you're wrong. You're a fool, but not for the way you used lefties.