They call themselves the 99%.
They seem to be made up of very liberal anti-establishment activists that are forming into a movement. This could get interesting.
They differ from the Tea-rorists in a few important ways.
Their movement is growing, not shrinking;
They are not financed and organized by billionaires and lobbyists;
They are not homophobic, xenophobic, or racist, as far as I can tell.
They need leadership. Right now their message is lost as they have about a billion different 'demands', some reasonable, many off the wall moronic.
They are nothing like the Tea Party. I've attended a few Tea Party events. I didn't see any people with metal rings in their noses or metal studs coming out of their cheeks. Plus they all had jobs and had taken a bath recently.
I guess the libtards forgot already the failure of the last time they tried to compete with the tea party. Anybody remember the "Coffee Party", anybody, anybody???
Launched with high hopes last year and seen by some as a progressive answer to Tea Party, the party has instead been an example of the failure to counter the power and energy of the tea party movement -- and its own board members are portraying it as an organizational disaster.
ITs already bigger than the "Tea Party" ever was.
ITs already bigger than the "Tea Party" ever was.
no. it. is. not.
Cite?
Nothing to do with this, Webby. Palin's bailin' and the TP is failin'.
Feast your eyes on this:
How much is the union paying its members to show up? Those people do not do nothing for free!!!
ITs already bigger than the "Tea Party" ever was.
That's because the "Tea Party" didn't announce a bogus concert, in an effort to make their ranks appear larger.![]()