Are you frigging drunk?
If tax cuts produce prosperity, why did Bush leave with the economy in a shambles?
Yea, they will definitely remember next year. Especially with articles like the one below. Pass it around and encourage everyone you know that cares to read it...
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109
Yea, they will definitely remember next year. Especially with articles like the one below. Pass it around and encourage everyone you know that cares to read it...
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109
Dude, your making our point for us (#OWS), the housing bubble wasn't caused by Freddie and Fannie, it was caused by the Bush Administration (The American Dream
Downpaymet Initiative .....http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/affordablehousing/programs/home/addi/). The housing bubble burst because of over-leveraging by Wall St. Also,
because of deceitful practices by mortgage brokers. See, Fannie & Freddie didn't impose the regulations that led to "anyone" qualifying for a loan, Bush did with the initiative referenced above. Also, you say regulations died in the Senate, funny republicans had control of the House and the Senate from 2000-2006. So, your argument is totally baseless as are all republican arguments sadly.
You want to find out what roll the conservatives have played in the last 11 years, read the article below, and while reading, remember that the people indicting your party are all
REPUBLICANS.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109
That's a misleading argument, that tax cut you refer to in '97 was originated by Newt Gingrich, and Clinton is culpable because he signed it. Truth is you need to open your eyes, just
because appeasement by Clinton is factual, doesn't mean your party isn't responsible for the atrocity that have become the Bush Tax cuts and their continued defense of them. Neither
does it absolve your presidential candidates, which all want to make them permanent and thus want to make income inequality a permanent part of our society...
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109
Between 1947 and 1979, productivity in the US rose by 119%, while the income of the bottom fifth of the population rose by 122%.
But from 1979 to 2009, productivity rose by 80%, while the income of the bottom fifth fell by 4%.
In roughly the same period, the income of the top 1% rose by 270%.
That's not saying much, is it?
I mean, look at the distinct lack of intellectual prowess displayed by the self-proclaimed "SmarterThatYou"...
![]()
You consider them "smart"?![]()
.smartest conservative members here.