Obama: we have asked Iran to return downed U.S. drone

That must be why Iran is building a nuke. So they can nuke themselves. Yup, yup.

DUNE
nukey_mo.jpg

Even when the other guy is attempting rational debate...it's always the same bullshit from poor, sad little Failias...LOL!
 
My point, "gentleman", is that Jarod tried to compare Reagan's policy of "trust but verify" with the Russians with The Obama spying on Iran. There is no fucking comparison whatsoever.

Why is that?

Explain in detail why there is "no fucking comparison"...
 
My point, "gentleman", is that Jarod tried to compare Reagan's policy of "trust but verify" with the Russians with The Obama spying on Iran. There is no fucking comparison whatsoever.

Really? Two presidents, of the same country, involved in a similar activity can't be compared? How do you figure?
 
Really? Two presidents, of the same country, involved in a similar activity can't be compared? How do you figure?

Well...ya see, one had an "R" after his name, so that makes whatever he did okay, while the other has a "D" after his name...and that makes him the DEVIL to two-faced hypocrites like DY.
 
Well...ya see, one had an "R" after his name, so that makes whatever he did okay, while the other has a "D" after his name...and that makes him the DEVIL to two-faced hypocrites like DY.

I would have thought that DY, being a "true" conservative and all, wouldn't much approve of a tax raising, deficit spender like Reagan.
 
Really? Two presidents, of the same country, involved in a similar activity can't be compared? How do you figure?


You can compare grapes to popcorn if you want.....but to what end ?.....the world was a different place 30 years ago and to compare today with what was, has no value.
 
I would have thought that DY, being a "true" conservative and all, wouldn't much approve of a tax raising, deficit spender like Reagan.

It all has to do with the "R" that came after Reagan's name...

It affords DY the opportunity to play to his partisan douchebag tendencies with no thought to honesty.
 
you missed the point.
How would you know what I miss?
Eye said:
should we apply 1700's logic today, simply because we don't want to 'ignore' history?
Logic is timeless so I'm happy to use 1700's logic -- you should try some!

And if you choose to ignore history I think that's more your problem than mine.
 
Really? Two presidents, of the same country, involved in a similar activity can't be compared? How do you figure?
Holy shit three retards in a row: Jarod, Zippy, and now you.

Reagan had an open agreement with the Soviets to verify facts on the ground. The Obama spied on the Iranians. Look up the definition of "spying" and show me where it says anything about agreements and openness.
 
Back
Top