Eric Holder Blocks South Carolina Voter ID For Racial Reasons
- Thread starter Alias
- Start date
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
If you think illegal voting is an issue, post the proof.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Since you made the choice to remain ignorant, when this was first discussed; I have no reason to try and make a horse drink the water.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You also have to have a....................
wait for it
....................FREAKING ID.
Translation; I don't have any proof but I can dance.
Disillusioned
New member
The argument of those against having ID's seems something akin to saying that 10% of kids have trouble reading, so we shouldn't make that mandatory it school. Yes some people have trouble getting ID's, that's a reason to help them not just say, "Oh well, guess they're just racist and we should ignore it."
Are you really this stupid or just a sick liar?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You may not be legion but you act just as childish. I'm dumb on voter fraud please explain how you would prove I'm not Larry bird if I vote in his precinct.
The penalty for voter fraud in Mass is 5 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Dune would seem to support bank robbery, since it's not "rampant".
Prove voter fraud.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Many vivid anecdotes of purported voter fraud have been proven false or do not demonstrate fraud.
Although there are a few scattered instances of real voter fraud, many of the vivid anecdotes cited in accounts of voter fraud have been proven false or vastly overstated.
In Missouri in 2000, for example, the Secretary of State claimed that 79 voters were registered with addresses at vacant lots, but subsequent investigation revealed that the lots in question actually housed valid and legitimate residences.
Similarly, a 1995 investigation into votes allegedly cast in Baltimore by deceased voters and those with disenfranchising felony convictions revealed that the voters in question were both alive and felony-free.
Many of the inaccurate claims result from lists of voters compared to other lists - of deceased individuals, persons with felony convictions, voters in other states, etc.
These attempts to match information often yield predictable errors.
In Florida in 2000, a list of purged voters later became notorious when it was discovered that the “matching” process captured eligible voters with names similar to - but decidedly different from - the names of persons with felony convictions, sometimes in other states entirely.
A 2005 attempt to identify supposed double voters in New Jersey mistakenly accused people with similar names but whose middle names or suffixes were clearly different, such as “J.T. Kearns, Jr.” and “J.T. Kearns, Sr.,” of being the same person.
http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/policy_brief_on_the_truth_about_voter_fraud/
Although there are a few scattered instances of real voter fraud, many of the vivid anecdotes cited in accounts of voter fraud have been proven false or vastly overstated.
In Missouri in 2000, for example, the Secretary of State claimed that 79 voters were registered with addresses at vacant lots, but subsequent investigation revealed that the lots in question actually housed valid and legitimate residences.
Similarly, a 1995 investigation into votes allegedly cast in Baltimore by deceased voters and those with disenfranchising felony convictions revealed that the voters in question were both alive and felony-free.
Many of the inaccurate claims result from lists of voters compared to other lists - of deceased individuals, persons with felony convictions, voters in other states, etc.
These attempts to match information often yield predictable errors.
In Florida in 2000, a list of purged voters later became notorious when it was discovered that the “matching” process captured eligible voters with names similar to - but decidedly different from - the names of persons with felony convictions, sometimes in other states entirely.
A 2005 attempt to identify supposed double voters in New Jersey mistakenly accused people with similar names but whose middle names or suffixes were clearly different, such as “J.T. Kearns, Jr.” and “J.T. Kearns, Sr.,” of being the same person.
http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/policy_brief_on_the_truth_about_voter_fraud/
Prove you can catch it legion troll
Prove it exists at all, asshole.
So you still have found no proof whatsoever?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Because there is none to find....LOL