All American Muslim?

Alias

Banned
The other day the New York Times invited a few contributors to answer the question “Is America’s religious freedom under threat?” The answer provided by Salam Al-Marayati, head of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), in an essay entitled “A Campaign Against Patriotic Muslims,” was a resounding yes – at least, that is, where his co-religionists are concerned. Among Al-Marayati’s assertions: “religious freedom for the Muslim American is under threat….Today’s anti-Muslim rhetoric is eerily similar to the pre-Nazi rhetoric against Jews….Hate against Muslim children in elementary and secondary schools is on the rise.” There is, insisted Al-Marayati, “an inquisition mentality toward America’s Muslims.”

People who have written books critical of Islam were described by Al-Marayati as “Muslim-haters” whose “work is reminiscent of the pre-Nazi propaganda…that regarded Judaism as a threat to Germany.” Al-Marayati railed about the controversy over the TLC reality show “All-American Muslim,” which, he sneered, “became a controversy because it did not include a terrorist.” America, he claimed, is being misled by those who, refusing to define American Islam by what he called its “mainstream,” insist rather on viewing it “through the lens of extremism.” “I love my faith and I love my country,” maintained Al-Marayati at the end of his piece. “The fact that some readers still question which country I am referring to indicates a serious level of distrust toward Muslim Americans.”

This isn’t the first time Al-Marayati has pleaded for American non-Muslims to reject “Muslim-haters” and recognize the compatibility of the Koran and the Constitution, Islamic law and Jeffersonian democracy. A couple of years ago he informed readers of the Huffington Post that “Islamic law has five goals accepted by all the scholars of Islam: securing and developing rights to life, expression, faith, family and property. That’s similar to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness.” The concluding flourish of his Huff Po article was almost identical to that of his Times piece: “I am an American. I am a Muslim. I will work for a better future for all Americans and Muslims worldwide.”

Then there’s the op-ed he published in the Wall Street Journal after the 2009 massacre at Fort Hood. Al-Marayati’s goal there was to put as much distance as possible between the killer, Army major Nidal Hasan, and Islam. Hasan, Al-Marayati contended, suffered from a “critical fault in understanding the Quran” and a “deeply flawed understanding of Islam” – which, he assured his readers, is (what else?) a religion of peace and justice. In short, Al-Marayati constructed an alternate reality in which there is no such thing as jihad and in which America is not engaged in a war with its practitioners.

So who is this spokesman for “mainstream” Islam – this man intent on spreading the good news that American Muslims are (as he put it in the Times) overwhelmingly “God-loving and America-loving” citizens who thoroughly reject all forms of violence and extremism? Well, he first gained national attention in 1999, when Dick Gephardt, having nominated him as a member of the National Commission on Terrorism, withdrew the nomination after learning that Al-Marayati had, in fact, publicly defended terrorism. (As Daniel Pipes noted shortly thereafter, this was “the first time that a prominent Muslim figure in America has been repudiated because of extremist politics.”)

A few more facts about Al-Marayati, courtesy of the Investigative Project on Terrorism. He’s described terrorist attacks by Hizballah as “legitimate resistance” and has told Muslims not to cooperate with FBI agents investigating their fellow believers. Under his leadership, the MPAC has called for the U.S. to remove Hizballah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad from its list of terrorist organizations. In 1996, when a Palestinian shouting “Allahu Akbar” drove his car into a Jerusalem crowd, killing one and injuring 23, Al-Marayati issued a condemnation – not of the terrorist but of the hero who shot him to death on the spot before he could wreak further damage. In 2006, Al-Marayati predicted a “storm…coming” for American Muslims that would be “worse than Japanese internment.” Where did he make this prediction? At “a fundraising dinner for Palestinian Islamic Jihad member Sami Al-Arian.”

Apparently the ludicrous equation of Islamic values with those articulated in the Declaration of Independence is standard practice for Al-Marayati. On more than one occasion he has suggested that Patrick Henry, when he said “Give me liberty or give me death,” was perfectly articulating the spirit of jihad. (This is not a joke.)

It should be clear to any sensate creature what we are dealing with here. And yet, as it turns out, Al—Marayati has not only been invited to peddle his slippery wares in places like the Times and Wall Street Journal and Huffington Post but has also, among much else, been welcomed as a panelist on Bill Maher’s Politically Correct and interviewed at length, in 2006, on PBS’s Frontline (in which, far from being asked a single remotely challenging question, he was spoon-fed inquiries plainly designed to allow him to serve up his usual spin). He was even a guest at the Clinton White House on multiple occasions, and has, in his capacity as head of MPAC, played host to White House staffers, as well as State and Defense department officials, at an iftar (Ramadan fast-breaking).

In short, Al-Marayati is yet another example of the dangerous determination of high-level figures in the mainstream media and government, and in sundry institutions ranging from the police to the military, to distort out of all recognition the harsh realities of jihad and sharia and to reimagine Islam as a benign faith that teach a love of peace and freedom – and, of course, to collaborate in this effort with Muslims whose own shady histories testify to the blatant dishonesty of the whole shebang.

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/12/28/all-american-muslim-2/
 
In short, Al-Marayati is yet another example of the dangerous determination of high-level figures in the mainstream media and government, and in sundry institutions ranging from the police to the military, to distort out of all recognition the harsh realities of jihad and sharia and to reimagine Islam as a benign faith that teach a love of peace and freedom – and, of course, to collaborate in this effort with Muslims whose own shady histories testify to the blatant dishonesty of the whole shebang.

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/12/28/all-american-muslim-2/

In short Alias finds muslims who would like for people not to hate on their religion and calls them liars and scoundrels because their Islam isn't the Islam of blowing things up. In the words of Hoople Muslims are underneath your bed Alias, and they come out at night!
 
In short Alias finds muslims who would like for people not to hate on their religion and calls them liars and scoundrels because their Islam isn't the Islam of blowing things up. In the words of Hoople Muslims are underneath your bed Alias, and they come out at night!

I'm not the topic. You lose.
 
In the last few ours I've read through 4 different "muslims are the enemy" topics that you've posted. You have become the topic.
 
In the last few ours I've read through 4 different "muslims are the enemy" topics that you've posted. You have become the topic.

Of course. You want to make me the topic because you're ignorant of Islam.

Islam is the enemy. Muslims are just poor stupid deceived fools. School me so I can prove to you and your pals that you're all just ignorant fools when it comes to Islam.
 
Nope. Why don't you try to convince me that Islamic terrorism is not a problem in the civilized world and that Christian terrorism is.

He might have tried, but he and many others have realized that you're just another closed minded little coward who won't admit when his crazy views have been proven wrong.

Why should we try to convince you when you've made it ABUNDANTLY clear you won't listen to ANYTHING ANYONE says unless it already fits nicely with your pre-conceived notions of what is fact and fiction?
 
Of course. You want to make me the topic because you're ignorant of Islam.

Islam is the enemy. Muslims are just poor stupid deceived fools. School me so I can prove to you and your pals that you're all just ignorant fools when it comes to Islam.

Why?

It's obvious your mind is already made up and you aren't going to change it no matter how much proof anyone brings to the table.
 
He might have tried, but he and many others have realized that you're just another closed minded little coward who won't admit when his crazy views have been proven wrong.

Why should we try to convince you when you've made it ABUNDANTLY clear you won't listen to ANYTHING ANYONE says unless it already fits nicely with your pre-conceived notions of what is fact and fiction?

Show us Where Jesus or any of his followers condoned violence in his name like Muslims do for Muhammed and Allah from the Koran. You can't. All of your name calling is not going to change the truth.

All you have is propaganda. I have the truth and I take it right from the Koran.
 
Why?

It's obvious your mind is already made up and you aren't going to change it no matter how much proof anyone brings to the table.

You can't. My mind is made up because of the truth. Islam is a violent religion. Christianity isn't. When a Christian commits violence in the name of Christianity or Jesus, then scriptures can't back him up for his crime. When a muslim commits violence and murder in the name of Muhammed or Allah, we can find numerous Koranic verses to back it up. Calling me names isn't going to change the truth. Loser.
 
Show us Where Jesus or any of his followers condoned violence in his name like Muslims do for Muhammed and Allah from the Koran. You can't. All of your name calling is not going to change the truth.

All you have is propaganda. I have the truth and I take it right from the Koran.

Violence towards unbelievers in the Bible...right:

Deuteronomy 7:3-5, 12:2-3...found that on the FIRST site I checked.


As to your "knowledge" of the Koran, what you call "the truth" are simply biased translations of specific verses taken out of context to justify your hate for your fellow human.
 
Violence towards unbelievers in the Bible...right:

Deuteronomy 7:3-5, 12:2-3...found that on the FIRST site I checked.


As to your "knowledge" of the Koran, what you call "the truth" are simply biased translations of specific verses taken out of context to justify your hate for your fellow human.

I said Christianity. Christianity starts in the Book of Acts. Dumb ass.
 
I said Christianity. Christianity starts in the Book of Acts. Dumb ass.

That's right...don't just admit you got schooled the first time...

Move those goalposts and try again!

Last time I checked..."Christians" don't just read and study everything from The Book of Acts forward...
 
That's right...don't just admit you got schooled the first time...

Move those goalposts and try again!

Last time I checked..."Christians" don't just read and study everything from The Book of Acts forward...

Christians follow Jesus. Show us from the bible any violence from Jesus or his followers. All I could find was Jesus overturning the tables and driving out the money changers and a disciple named Peter cutting off a Roman's ear to protect Jesus that Jesus immediately healed. Can you find anything else?
 
Christians follow Jesus. Show us from the bible any violence from Jesus or his followers. All I could find was Jesus overturning the tables and driving out the money changers and a disciple named Peter cutting off a Roman's ear to protect Jesus that Jesus immediately healed. Can you find anything else?

Like I said...when Christians stop carrying, reading and studying from the Old Tesatment, then you can maybe make the claim the numerous instances of violence and destruction against non-believers on the record don't count...

And whatever you do, let's not discuss the FIRST FOUR BOOKS of the New Testament...
 
Like I said...when Christians stop carrying, reading and studying from the Old Tesatment, then you can maybe make the claim the numerous instances of violence and destruction against non-believers on the record don't count...til then however?

Willful ignorance will trap you if you're not careful.

Which violent doctrine from the OT do Christians practice today?

The first four books of the NEW TESTAMENT contain no Christian violence. Perhaps you meant the first four books of the OT, in which case there is no mention of Jesus or followers of his because Jesus didn't appear until a few thousand years later.

Keep trying. Perhaps some shit will stick to the wall if you keep trying. Ya never know.
 
And what about the 10 Commandments?

They are from the Old Testament...does that mean they are NOT a part of Christianity?

Christians are not under the law. Sin is still sin and the unbeliever will pay the price, not the Christian who has put his faith in Jesus Christ. I can give you free bible lessons if you need them. No problem.
 
Willful ignorance will trap you if you're not careful.

Which violent doctrine from the OT do Christians practice today?

The first four books of the NEW TESTAMENT contain no Christian violence. Perhaps you meant the first four books of the OT, in which case there is no mention of Jesus or followers of his because Jesus didn't appear until a few thousand years later.

Keep trying. Perhaps some shit will stick to the wall if you keep trying. Ya never know.

Mark 10:14-15
 
Back
Top