Because they work for the global bankers, like bernake and corzine and goldman sachs, just like Obama and the rest of them who are about to finalize the police state the hijacked government needs to implement the final stages of the population culling plan the elites have been talking about for half a century or more.
why do you think government scientists are creating air-borne N5H1
dutch-scientists-create-a-highly-contagious-airborne-strain-of-deadly-h5n1-bird-flu-us-government-fears-outbreak-pandemic
http://www.periscopepost.com/2011/1...rd-flu-us-government-fears-outbreak-pandemic/
Both sides are corrupt. please be more critical of the leaders you accept information and guidance from. Neither side is trustworthy. They all voted for unconstitutional laws. We are justified in revolt. They put it on paper. Please wake up from the left/right trance. Both parties are working towards the same goal for the same masters
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
so you claim only republicans wanted this bill? why did a dem "by request" introduce the bill? and co sponsor is essentially co-author.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
seriously, why do you continue to lie that it was only republicans?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
at the demand of your president. why are you ignoring that?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
it doesn't matter who wrote it.....a democrat SPONSORED it
it is like saying, i wrote this post, and STY supports it, means STY doesn't agree with me
good lord
it is like saying, i wrote this post, and STY supports it, means STY doesn't agree with me
good lord
SmarterthanYou
rebel
looks like obama did part of it.
evince
Truthmatters
Yes it does matter who wrote it.
You pretend any dem who co operates with the right is responsible for EVERYTHING the republican house does?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
la la la la la la la.
desh, your fingers have a ton of ear wax on them
WHY DID OBAMA DEMAND THAT LANGUAGE SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTING AMERICAN CITIZENS FROM INDEFINITE DETAINMENT BE REMOVED FROM THE BILL OR HE WOULD VETO IT????????
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Mr. MCKEON (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Washington) (both by request)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Armed Services
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Armed Services
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you're spinning out of control. i never said they are responsible for what pubs do, i said BOTH dems and pubs supported this bill. more pubs than dems and in the senate, your precious democratic senator levine was a HUGE proponent of it. but you want to dishonestly claim only the pubs are responsible.
that is pure partisan hackery. wake up.
evince
Truthmatters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Terrorists
The Authorization for Use of Military Force [1] is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress on September 14, 2001, authorizing the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001. The authorization granted the President the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the September 11th attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups. The AUMF was signed by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001.
The AUMF was unsuccessfully cited by the George W. Bush administration in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the administration's military commissions at Guantanamo Bay were not competent tribunals as constituted and thus illegal.
The Authorization for Use of Military Force [1] is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress on September 14, 2001, authorizing the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001. The authorization granted the President the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the September 11th attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups. The AUMF was signed by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001.
The AUMF was unsuccessfully cited by the George W. Bush administration in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the administration's military commissions at Guantanamo Bay were not competent tribunals as constituted and thus illegal.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
House of Representatives
On September 14, 2001 bill House Joint Resolution 64 passed in the House. The totals in the House of Representatives were: 420 Ayes, 1 Nay and 10 Not Voting (the Nay was Barbara Lee - D-CA).
[edit] Senate
On September 14, 2001 Senate Joint Resolution 23 passed in the Senate by roll call vote. The totals in the Senate were: 98 Ayes, 0 Nays, 2 Present/Not Voting (Senators Larry Craig - R and Jesse Helms - R).
evince is in full meltdown mode
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I did???????