Why was he allowed to own guns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
Alias said:
So why was he allowed to own guns? Because he broke no laws that would require his guns to be taken away. You built a mansion with straw and it got blown away.
Click to expand...

If only you could read.

Go back up the thread and ask an adult to explain those big words that are confusing you.
 
Alias said:
Tell us why his guns were not taken away. Who fucked up?
Click to expand...

That's the question that heads the thread.

Instead of an answer, I spent the last couple of hours watching you and your partners in ignorance display dogged denials.

:palm:
 
Alias said:
Could you please provide me an interpretor on the taxpayer's dime. I don't read govt crap very well.
Click to expand...

You don't read anything very well, judging by your performance this evening. If you don't understand the facts relevant to an issue, don't debate.
 
\\(())// said:
You don't read anything very well, judging by your performance this evening. If you don't understand the facts relevant to an issue, don't debate.
Click to expand...

you should take your own advice. i've given you facts and law and you have ignored both in order to continue your dishonest hackery
 
Supreme Being Yurt said:
\\\legion/// just pwned himself thoroughly

i now have more proof he is just a cut and paste troll. previously he has slammed someone for not seeing or knowing the difference between "may" and "shall".....

his citation of WA law is "may" unless he has used the guns or dangerous weapons. therefore, without knowing more, the answer is quite simple:

1. may is permissive, not mandatory

2. he didn't get the restraining order because he used guns or a dangerous weapon.

you're welcome for the education
Click to expand...

Supreme Being Yurt said:
watch....legon will ignore the law and the facts in order to continue posting lies
Click to expand...

Mother Fucking Bump
 
\\(())// said:
The man authorities believe was responsible for the New Year's Day shooting death of a national park ranger in Washington state was a former soldier who owned many knives and guns despite an emotionally unstable, vindictive and anger-prone mind-set, the mother of his toddler daughter said in court documents.


While investigators said Monday they had little insight into Barnes' mind-set or motivations, the woman with whom he was in a custody dispute over their young daughter said in court documents filed last year that she was frightened to be in the same state with him.


"The weapons are harmful and I don't know if he will try to use them against myself or my family," the woman wrote in a filing for a temporary restraining order filed with the Pierce County Superior Court on May 24.


Before the shooting at the national park, Barnes was wanted in connection with a shooting Sunday in the Seattle suburb of Skyway that left four people wounded.


A woman who said she had spurned Barnes' romantic advances said he visited her on Sunday morning.


She thought Barnes was a nice guy when they first met, but that he "seemed sketchy" after she got to know him better. That he turned to violence in his final days wasn't shocking to her. "It doesn't surprise me, honestly. He is a loose cannon. If he doesn't get his way or something makes him upset, he goes all the way out of control".


http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/03/justice/washington-ranger-killed/?hpt=us_c2
Click to expand...

while he did not violate any laws until he started shooting, he could have been banned from purchasing firearms if a licensed mental health professional found him to be dangerous to himself and/or others
 
Unfortionately, he was discharged for DUI. Most likely, if he had stayed in longer, his PTSD symptoms would have shown-up stronger, and an Army psychiatrist would have evaluated him.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
and neither do you, since you still haven't been able to determine the difference between state and federal yet.
Click to expand...

or the difference between may and shall and whether he used a gun or dangerous weapon.

legion completely misread the law, but refuses to recant even after being shown the truth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top