Obama, A Damn Liar

[Alias]

What is one of them? Where is the rule? Quote it. Link it. Show me the text of this rule.

In any event, Congress doesn't get to define the terms used in the Constitution.

Are you kidding me? We have 3 separate co-equal branches of Govt. Do you understand that all 3 branches are equal?

 

[Bonestorm]

Are you kidding me? We have 3 separate co-equal branches of Govt. Do you understand that all 3 branches are equal?

Yes, I do, but lets stay on topic. Where is this secret rule that you are relying on?

 

[Alias]

Yes, I do, but lets stay on topic. Where is this secret rule that you are relying on?

I gave it to you. It's right up there in big black words.

 

[Bonestorm]

So you're sticking with that? OK. Nice chatting with you.

 

[christiefan915]

Oh my, yes. I should ignore Forbes and listen to you. Uh huh, yup.

I asked for personal opinions and could have googled info from magazines if that's what I wanted.

 

[christiefan915]

So you're sticking with that? OK. Nice chatting with you.

You will not get a straight answer to any question you ask him. Believe me, many of us have tried.

 

[Alias]

So you're sticking with that? OK. Nice chatting with you.

Of course I'm sticking with it. It's a legal procedure to keep Obama from appointing someone and he just ignored it. Obama is ignoring the US Constitution. Not my problem. It's a problem with the Dem party. First the HCB, Libya, and now this. One violation after another.

 

[Alias]

You will not get a straight answer to any question you ask him. Believe me, many of us have tried.

Read post #187. That's about as straight as it gets.

I'm not the problem, sweetheart. I'm not the one violating the US Constitution. Some of you are really very confused.

 

[zappasguitar]

Once again, the Constitution states that the House and the Senate make up their rules to abide by. This is one of them.

And where PRECISELY does it say that in the Constitution?

you keep responding with these vague non-answers...how's about you get SPECIFIC for once?

 

[zappasguitar]

Read post #187. That's about as straight as it gets.

I'm not the problem, sweetheart. I'm not the one violating the US Constitution. Some of you are really very confused.

You just can't quote where in the Constitution this "rule" you keep referring to actually is.

 

[Alias]

And where PRECISELY does it say that in the Constitution?

you keep responding with these vague non-answers...how's about you get SPECIFIC for once?

"The Constitution empowers each House to determine its rules of proceedings."

Article I, Section 5.

Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

Now go fuck yourself, you miscreant little cocksucker.

 

[Alias]

Here is some more, you fucking stupid cocksuckers.

Article II, Section 2, Clause 2

[The President] shall nominate, and, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

 

[DamnYankee]

Where did the libtards go? The Constitution is to liberals like a light is to cockroaches.

 

[Alias]