George W. Bush is a 'God'

I dont feel like finding the cites right now, I am tired, maybe tomorrow... But are you kidding, the economy was worse in 1980 than it was in 09'? The recession of the late 70's was worse than what we are just now comming out of?

Yes Jarod. Double digit inflation, double digit unemployment... a high inflationary environment has a far worse impact on our standard of living and purchasing power. It was far worse for the middle class than what we have today. It isn't even close.
 
I dont feel like finding the cites right now, I am tired, maybe tomorrow... But are you kidding, the economy was worse in 1980 than it was in 09'? The recession of the late 70's was worse than what we are just now comming out of?

LMAO... you don't HAVE the cites because they don't exist. Don't give us some lame ass 'I am tired' excuse. You were pulling shit from your ass and flinging it. Now you find yourself embarrassed again because I called you on it.
 
I DID pick the topic...

Is 10.1% unemployment WORSE than 8.6% unemployment.

For some reason though neither you nor PMP wants to discuss that very salient question.

Dude, you are a fucking idiot......you were a fucking idiot when you can up with this specious dodge to avoid the truth and you are more of a fucking idiot every time you repeat it......from here on out I am going to laugh at you instead of answer you until you drop the idiot act and start debating like a fucking human being.....
 
I dont feel like finding the cites right now, I am tired, maybe tomorrow... But are you kidding, the economy was worse in 1980 than it was in 09'? The recession of the late 70's was worse than what we are just now comming out of?

I take it you weren't born yet.......have you seen double digit inflation?.....cars in lines at gas stations.....mortgage rates of 20%.......unemployment rates up 400%?.......
 
Jarod... are you done being 'too tired' to back up your bullshit claims?

Yes, I am rested, I was in trial all day yesterday, (I lost) and am feeling better today.

It took me about 30 seconds to get the cite below. You can pull up all types of comparisons, the one that proves my above statement is the one that compares recessions with a bar chart. 2007 was by far the worst.

http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/studies/recession_perspective/index.cfm
 
the one that came up when I hit the link showed that the 1981 recession had rebounded 4% in a year while the current one had rebounded 2% in 42 months......does this make you conclude the current one is "worse" or make you conclude it wasn't dealt with as effectively?.....

from what I see for the first 12-15 months of each recession things parallel.....then, about the time Obama took office it nosedives and tracks worse.....
 
I like this site.....click on recession by state and compare 81 to 2007 for each of the swing states Obama needs to win in order to get re-elected.....if the GOP uses these as campaign tools in each of those states Obama will retire to the speaking circuit soon......
 
the one that proves my above statement is the one that compares recessions with a bar chart. 2007 was by far the worst.

take that chart and set the time lapse at one month into the recession.....then advance it one month at a time......notice how the 1981 damage starts to decline, notice how the 2007 recession starts to worsen.....that is the impact of measures taken to solve the problem.....notice how 17 months after the recession began, only the 2007 recession hasn't been resolved......that would bring us to what, late 2010?......
 
the one that came up when I hit the link showed that the 1981 recession had rebounded 4% in a year while the current one had rebounded 2% in 42 months......does this make you conclude the current one is "worse" or make you conclude it wasn't dealt with as effectively?.....

from what I see for the first 12-15 months of each recession things parallel.....then, about the time Obama took office it nosedives and tracks worse.....

I notice that in your considered analysis you have neglected to factor in the profound effect that the Eurozone is having on the world's economy.

http://www.tradepreciousmetals.com/the-impact-of-the-eurozone-crisis-on-the-us-economy/
 
the one that came up when I hit the link showed that the 1981 recession had rebounded 4% in a year while the current one had rebounded 2% in 42 months......does this make you conclude the current one is "worse" or make you conclude it wasn't dealt with as effectively?.....

from what I see for the first 12-15 months of each recession things parallel.....then, about the time Obama took office it nosedives and tracks worse.....


Are you so ADD that you cant you follow along the thread of a discussion for more than 30 seconds.

The cite was to show that the recession was one of the worst ever, and that the recovery has been proportional.
 
Yes, I am rested, I was in trial all day yesterday, (I lost) and am feeling better today.

It took me about 30 seconds to get the cite below. You can pull up all types of comparisons, the one that proves my above statement is the one that compares recessions with a bar chart. 2007 was by far the worst.

http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/studies/recession_perspective/index.cfm

LMAO... the two charts show the economic recovery in 1981 was by far quicker than what is taking place today.
 
LMAO... the two charts show the economic recovery in 1981 was by far quicker than what is taking place today.


Please open your eyes and try to see past your desperation to attack me... I never said the economic recovery was better now than in 81'. I said the recession was worse this time than it was in the late 70's so a slower recovery was to be expected.
 
Are you so ADD that you cant you follow along the thread of a discussion for more than 30 seconds.

The cite was to show that the recession was one of the worst ever, and that the recovery has been proportional.

They are saying it was the 'worst' because of the number of points unemployment and economic output fell. But when you actually look at the economy and how it affected the middle class... the early 80's were far worse for the middle class. It isn't even close.
 
They are saying it was the 'worst' because of the number of points unemployment and economic output fell. But when you actually look at the economy and how it affected the middle class... the early 80's were far worse for the middle class. It isn't even close.


Twist and spin, I am talking about economics not images of how the middle class faired. I am talking about how sick the patient (economy) was that was presented to the doctor (president).

You are trying to say, ya but my patient's big toe was in more pain that that of the guy with the terminal cancer.
 
Please open your eyes and try to see past your desperation to attack me... I never said the economic recovery was better now than in 81'. I said the recession was worse this time than it was in the late 70's so a slower recovery was to be expected.

you DO realize we can all still see your previous comments? You know... like...

Look at the numbers, it took Reagan a little over three years to get any signifigant signs of recovery!.

You were stating that it took Reagan a little over three years and you were comparing that directly to what has happened under Obama. You lied (or were severely misinformed) about the Reagan recovery.

You are also 100% wrong to state that the recession was worse. DOUBLE DIGIT INFLATION JAROD... what was the inflationary effect this time around? Did people see their purchasing power erode as they did in the late 70's/early 80's? No, they did not. The reason the MN Fed site you posted states that the 2007 recession was DEEPER, was because they look a the total point drop of unemployment and economic output. When unemployment runs high PRIOR to the official technical definition of a recession, it is going to be shallower in those terms. But in terms of impact on the middle and lower classes, the late 70's early 80's was a far worse time economically.
 
you DO realize we can all still see your previous comments? You know... like...



You were stating that it took Reagan a little over three years and you were comparing that directly to what has happened under Obama. You lied (or were severely misinformed) about the Reagan recovery.

You are also 100% wrong to state that the recession was worse. DOUBLE DIGIT INFLATION JAROD... what was the inflationary effect this time around? Did people see their purchasing power erode as they did in the late 70's/early 80's? No, they did not. The reason the MN Fed site you posted states that the 2007 recession was DEEPER, was because they look a the total point drop of unemployment and economic output. When unemployment runs high PRIOR to the official technical definition of a recession, it is going to be shallower in those terms. But in terms of impact on the middle and lower classes, the late 70's early 80's was a far worse time economically.

That is not what you were asking on a cite about, however Ill find one on that also. Funny how you change your argument once I prove my case.
 
Twist and spin, I am talking about economics not images of how the middle class faired. I am talking about how sick the patient (economy) was that was presented to the doctor (president).

You are trying to say, ya but my patient's big toe was in more pain that that of the guy with the terminal cancer.

LMAO... you are NOT talking about economics Jarod. You are trying to use data that you don't understand because you think it makes your point. The data does NOT support your claim that the recession was worse. Period. The economy was FAR sicker then that it was in 2007. Period.

The problem Jarod is that Obama didn't focus on the economy. He instead tried to ram Obama care down our throats. He ignored the economy for over a year Jarod. THAT is a large reason we saw such a delay in recovery. Add in the fact that he spent (I mean 'invested) the bulk of the stimulus money in handouts to public sector workers and it is clear why this 'recovery' has been so abysmal.
 
That is not what you were asking on a cite about, however Ill find one on that also. Funny how you change your argument once I prove my case.

Now you are just outright lying Jarod. Post 29. I asked you to post the data you were using that would back up your CLAIM that it took Reagan 'a little over three years' to recover. THAT is what I asked you for Jarod. Then in post 39 you responded with the 'I am too tired'
 
Back
Top