GOP race: seems no one is the clear winner yet

[Don Quixote]

just read santorum is expected to pick up two states. still fairly early, obama and hillary were neck and neck at this point, but seems the voters are all over the place and aren't strongly behind any candidate.

unless the GOP comes together, this is obama's to lose. imo.

worse case for the gop is no candidate with a winning number of candidates when the convention rolls around

 

[apple0154]

You are a communist, aren't ya? You're also a generalist.

OK, Mr. Marx, let's break down the 45k: Of the supposed 45,000 deaths, how many could have chosen medical coverage, but did not? Also, show me the demographics break down of that 45k, and list the reasons why each victim did not have medical insurance.

If medical insurance was mandatory OR single payer/nationalized there wouldn't be a problem.

 

[zappasguitar]

He still signed the damn bill, didn't he? He signed it despite his "reservations".

Uh-huh....

He signed a bill that 86 SENATORS VOTED FOR...but you want to blame him exclusively.

AND he said "My administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens,"

So until he goes back on his word how about you give the guy the benefit of the doubt?

uh-huh...

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You are a communist, aren't ya? You're also a generalist.

OK, Mr. Marx, let's break down the 45k: Of the supposed 45,000 deaths, how many could have chosen medical coverage, but did not? Also, show me the demographics break down of that 45k, and list the reasons why each victim did not have medical insurance.

If medical insurance was mandatory OR single payer/nationalized there wouldn't be a problem.

That wasn't what you were asked.
Granule wanted to know the following:
"OK, Mr. Marx, let's break down the 45k: Of the supposed 45,000 deaths, how many could have chosen medical coverage, but did not? Also, show me the demographics break down of that 45k, and list the reasons why each victim did not have medical insurance."

 

[apple0154]

That wasn't what you were asked.
Granule wanted to know the following:
"OK, Mr. Marx, let's break down the 45k: Of the supposed 45,000 deaths, how many could have chosen medical coverage, but did not? Also, show me the demographics break down of that 45k, and list the reasons why each victim did not have medical insurance."

I don't have those statistics. In any case, whatever the reason or reasons, it resulted in 45,000 deaths.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I don't have those statistics. In any case, whatever the reason or reasons, it resulted in 45,000 deaths.

So you have nothing factual to support your assertion and are just throwing out numbers,in an attempt to bolster your arguement.

You just pulled a Demofact.