US Congress shall make no law, unless they don't want to be bothered by you

http://rt.com/usa/news/348-act-tresspass-buildings-437/

Just when you thought the government couldn’t ruin the First Amendment any further: The House of Representatives approved a bill on Monday that outlaws protests in instances where some government officials are nearby, whether or not you even know it.

The US House of Representatives voted 388-to-3 in favor of H.R. 347 late Monday, a bill which is being dubbed the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. In the bill, Congress officially makes it illegal to trespass on the grounds of the White House, which, on the surface, seems not just harmless and necessary, but somewhat shocking that such a rule isn’t already on the books. The wording in the bill, however, extends to allow the government to go after much more than tourists that transverse the wrought iron White House fence.

Under the act, the government is also given the power to bring charges against Americans engaged in political protest anywhere in the country.

Under current law, White House trespassers are prosecuted under a local ordinance, a Washington, DC legislation that can bring misdemeanor charges for anyone trying to get close to the president without authorization. Under H.R. 347, a federal law will formally be applied to such instances, but will also allow the government to bring charges to protesters, demonstrators and activists at political events and other outings across America.

The new legislation allows prosecutors to charge anyone who enters a building without permission or with the intent to disrupt a government function with a federal offense if Secret Service is on the scene, but the law stretches to include not just the president’s palatial Pennsylvania Avenue home. Under the law, any building or grounds where the president is visiting — even temporarily — is covered, as is any building or grounds “restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance."
 
It's a security law, and generally there's lots of places where the president isn't. Protest there. I would say that it's relatively mindless, didn't really need to be put into law and likely to inflame people who don't like laws, but other than that, rather harmless.
 
It's a security law, and generally there's lots of places where the president isn't. Protest there. I would say that it's relatively mindless, didn't really need to be put into law and likely to inflame people who don't like laws, but other than that, rather harmless.

so now we're in favor of free speech zones. interesting.
 
?

The law is for the prevention of protesting in areas around the president and others protected by the secret service. How did you take that, and turn it into "NO FREE SPEACH IN THESE AREAS"?
because, with the exception that the law didn't exist during the Bush years, liberals went bonkers over free speech zones saying it violated the 1st Amendment. Now, it appears that they are in favor of free speech zones.
 
and the silence from the left is deafening as barely a peep is raised over the signing of this new law, making it a felony to protest ANYWHERE the secret service is protecting someone.
 
Wait, this passed the senate too and was signed into law?

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/03/12/civil-liberties-advicates-see-backslide-in-new-trespass-law/

Last week, President Obama signed into law the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, which has been called “the anti-Occupy” bill, but as the ACLU points out, it was the elimination of one word from an existing law that could make life harder for protesters.

As first-year criminal law students know, most crimes require that a certain state of mind be proven. The new law re-writes an existing 1971 trespass law, which stated someone had to act “willfully and knowingly” when committing the crime.

Now, the language has been changed so that the actor only need behave “knowingly,” which would mean knowing one was in a restricted area but not necessarily that he or she was committing a crime. This small change would allow the Secret Service to arrest protestors more easily, the ACLU said in a statement.

The law makes it an offense to knowingly enter the certain areas without legal authority.
 
Back
Top