US soldier massacres unarmed civilians

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
The death toll is rising..


A lone American serviceman slipped away from his base in southern Afghanistan before dawn Sunday and went on a methodical house-to-house shooting spree in a nearby village, killing 16 people, nearly all of them women and children...


The shooting early Sunday took place in Panjwayi district outside Kandahar city, in a village called Alkozai.


The official tally was 16 dead. Nine of them were women, four were children and three were men...


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/wor...-soldier-kills-up-to-18-afghan-civilians.html


Wonder if the murderer was a hoplosexual...

Hoplosexual said:
bFmJ6l.jpg


I've waited over two years for one to come to market, be available, and at the right price. Finally I got a good enough deal on one at Christmas time and put the order in. And today I got the call, to go pick up my BRAND NEW KEL TEC RFB!

I have it next to me and a throbbing erection from carrassing it.
Click to expand...
 
SmarterThanYou said:
I did not say that, but nice try at a deflection. wanna try again? i see you also started another poll asking a bit of a different question. is it that difficult for you to grasp a simple concept?
Click to expand...

You posted this in a thread about a US soldier who shot unarmed civilians:

SmarterThanYou said:
still want to give government personnel 2nd Amendment rights?
Click to expand...

Then, when asked if government employees should be disarmed, you said this:

SmarterThanYou said:
while they are working for the government, yes. did you forget how to read?
Click to expand...

Are soldiers in the field not working for the government, or not government employees?
 
\\(())// said:
You posted this in a thread about a US soldier who shot unarmed civilians:

Then, when asked if government employees should be disarmed, you said this:

Are soldiers in the field not working for the government, or not government employees?
Click to expand...

do I really need to explain to you how government issued weapons works? or the difference between 'rights' and 'privileges'? are you truly that retarded?
 
RIGHTS are something someone has WITHOUT government permission.
PRIVILEGES are something someone has WITH government permission.
A private in the army has no RIGHT to carry an M16 or an M4, nor a handgun, grenade launcher, or knife. When the military decides that said private CAN carry a weapon, they get issued ONE single weapon and every round of ammunition is accounted for. They are then told when to return that weapon. Whereas I, living in TX, can go out and buy any handgun or rifle/shotgun that I may want to, not withstanding the unconstitutional regulations and prohibitions that the federal government currently has popular public support in violating anyway.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
RIGHTS are something someone has WITHOUT government permission. PRIVILEGES are something someone has WITH government permission. A private in the army has no RIGHT to carry an M16 or an M4, nor a handgun, grenade launcher, or knife. When the military decides that said private CAN carry a weapon, they get issued ONE single weapon and every round of ammunition is accounted for. They are then told when to return that weapon. Whereas I, living in TX, can go out and buy any handgun or rifle/shotgun that I may want to, not withstanding the unconstitutional regulations and prohibitions that the federal government currently has popular public support in violating anyway.
Click to expand...

I see. Does your private have the right to acquire and keep his own handgun or rifle/shotgun in his capacity as a citizen, even though he is a government employee?
 
\\(())// said:
I see. Does your private have the right to acquire and keep his own handgun or rifle/shotgun in his capacity as a citizen, even though he is a government employee?
Click to expand...

when acting as a private citizen, yes indeed. you would have gotten this answer alot sooner if you'd been able to make the distinction, but you would not.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
when acting as a private citizen, yes indeed. you would have gotten this answer alot sooner if you'd been able to make the distinction, but you would not.
Click to expand...

What about police? Do they have a right to keep and bear arms?
 
\\(())// said:
Should police and military personnel be armed when on duty, either with government-issued weapons and ammunition or personal 'back-up' weaponry?
Click to expand...
personal weaponry should most definitely NOT be allowed. as far as issuing them weapons, if they show themselves to be irresponsible in any way, shape, or form, then hell no. the same standards we are held to, they should be held to.

and if we the people are denied our right to carry, then cops should be disarmed as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top