nice Jesus cultist Burn!Post #104 in this thread;
nice Jesus cultist Burn!Post #104 in this thread;
Post #104 in this thread;
In what way is he "not living it"? Does he run charities? Yes. Does he act as he preaches? As far as I can tell.
Are you upset that he is able to have success working basically as a community organizer for his religious views? Yeah, I can tell you are.
However, this is not 'evidence' of his hypocrisy, only of your immense dislike of him and his religious views.
I have no problem with religious veiws whatsoever, if anything I am thankful that there is a generaly accepted moral code available for many to follow.
I do have problems with;
1. Evangelists
2. Television evangelists in particular
3. Wealthy TV evangelists who solicit donations from the poor.
Charitable work is NOT idicative of a good soul. Huge charities were started by the greediest of men.
Need some more, huh? What has Robertson's stand been on illegal drug use for the majority of his career? Opposed. Yes, that alone was being hypocritical AS PROVEN BY HIS REVERSAL.
I have no problem with religious veiws whatsoever, if anything I am thankful that there is a generaly accepted moral code available for many to follow.
I do have problems with;
1. Evangelists
2. Television evangelists in particular
3. Wealthy TV evangelists who solicit donations from the poor.
Charitable work is NOT idicative of a good soul. Huge charities were started by the greediest of men.
it's karma, now they have to reap what they sowed. The wirldwind is coming.Damned if you do and damned if you don't. Christians can't win.
He probably wants to grow it or profit now, donations are down so he needs the revenue. He is a man of greed. His organization invested in "blood diamonds". There is a definite disconnect with Robertson.
I understand your viewpoint, but it has absolutely no bearing at all. Pat Robertson has broken no laws. I have a problem with people using the system to profit and commit fraud. Let's take care of the real criminals first. No one is forcing people to donate to Christian evangelists and the fact that some are poor has absolutely no bearing.
However, none of this is indicative of hypocrisy. Does Pat Robertson do what he says you should? All indications are that he actually does. While you may have a problem with him, it isn't "hypocrisy", that word is misapplied here. Had he said that nobody should preach on TV then went on to preach on TV there would be an indication of hypocrisy. However, he doesn't say that. Does he solicit money for his Christian charities? Yes. Does he bring in a salary as a Pastor that is also on TV? Yes. Does he say nobody should draw a salary for that work? No.
All of the things you list are your problem with Pat, but they aren't hypocrisy.
supporting jailing for pot is certainly not being very christian!!!
He may be switching to pro pot because the majority now are pro pot.
He needs to stay with the time to keep the money rolling in.
That's great, but I never said he broke any laws. I said he is a hypocrite.
Everyone's a hypocrite in some way. We're all human and fallible.
Yet when one claims the mantle of relaying the word of God, ones acts as if infallible and is certainly accepted as such by those who would donate to said person.
Can you give it a rest now? You flogged so many dead horses on here, you could start up a boucherie chevaline.
In the post I quoted you said it nearly word for word.
You said his "reversal" was hypocritical. That is flat saying that changing his opinion is hypocritical. Which is a misapplication of the word at the very best and a direct purposeful misdirection at the worst.
At some point an intelligent person would stop after it was clear they were so very wrong.
an entirely reasonable assumption. my grandmother (RIP) went through that very same scenario. i don't want to give out details, but her children convinced her and she was greatful for it. despite her life long stance against it.
tbo....i don't think you should hold that against anyone. sometimes it takes extraordinary circumstances to change someone's opinion. or maybe towards the end they see things differently. i would hope you're not mocking him for this.