Tennessee legislators tell women to kiss privacy good-bye

PostmodernProphet said:
making sure the statistics are accurate?....instead of only getting parts of the data?.....
Click to expand...

I'm a Republican. Republicans generally call for more freedom and less government. I find it difficult to believe this guy is only concerned with statistics. There is a reason behind him wanting these statistics whatever that may be. That's what I'm trying to understand.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
if you are not already innately aware of why you're wrong there's no use trying to explain it to you again....I'm content to let you continue being stupid.....

this thread shows once again, just how stupid some liberals can be.....
Click to expand...

Congrats, that is the same stupid fucking response that Rana gave when I asked her to back up her position. The old 'if you don't already know, then I am not going to tell you'... just as fucking stupid coming from you.
 
cawacko said:
I'm a Republican. Republicans generally call for more freedom and less government. I find it difficult to believe this guy is only concerned with statistics. There is a reason behind him wanting these statistics whatever that may be. That's what I'm trying to understand.
Click to expand...

Well, that all depends.
 
Superfreak said:
Really, the CDC currently forces women to provide this data? Do link us up to that rule.
Click to expand...

you see, that's why we end up with stupid people in office....stupid voters.....this act doesn't require women to report anything.....it requires medical centers to provide statistics.....there is no identifying information......it's sort of like this board....I know you say stupid things, but I don't know who you are.....
 
Superfreak said:
Congrats, that is the same stupid fucking response that Rana gave when I asked her to back up her position. The old 'if you don't already know, then I am not going to tell you'... just as fucking stupid coming from you.
Click to expand...

well shucks.....since the information is already contained in this thread and you haven't bothered to read or comprehend it so far, is there any reason to expect things will change?.....it isn't a factor of "I'm not going to tell you"....it's a factor of "You've already been told"......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and we should be concerned with your paranoia for what reason?......
Click to expand...

I don't really consider questioning why a politician does something paranoia but maybe it is? Would you recommend we accept everything a politician says or does at face value?

Would it be accurate to state you that you may be showing some paranoia yourself by your responses here to those questioning the motives behind this gentleman's actions?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you see, that's why we end up with stupid people in office....stupid voters.....this act doesn't require women to report anything.....it requires medical centers to provide statistics.....there is no identifying information......it's sort of like this board....I know you say stupid things, but I don't know who you are.....
Click to expand...

Clearly you are a fine example of the stupid voter you speak of. Do you understand what identifying information IS? From the things I have stated in the past, I bet people can indeed figure out who I am. The same goes for this law. If you have two people give me personal data (not including name/address) which do you think will be easier for me to find? The person who gives me three pieces of data or the one who gives me ten?
 
cawacko said:
I don't really consider questioning why a politician does something paranoia but maybe it is? Would you recommend we accept everything a politician says or does at face value?

Would it be accurate to state you that you may be showing some paranoia yourself by your responses here to those questioning the motives behind this gentleman's actions?
Click to expand...

Cawacko it's good to see you taking an interest in these issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top