Obama: 'If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon'

Was race a factor in the killing?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 60.0%

  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Don't know

    Votes: 2 40.0%

  • No, because they are both non-white

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .
Onceler said:
I didn't - there were 3 from you, and 3 from whatever his/her name is.

It's funny you think there is a huge difference even if there were 4, btw. Is that the arbitrary limit you set, because you started only 3?

LOL

LOL
Click to expand...

wrong liar...he had four....funny how numbers don't matter when they prove you lie. funny how you always defend legion. funny how you ignore the second page.

good to know that you love kissing legion troll's ass.
 
none said:
wrong liar...he had four....funny how numbers don't matter when they prove you lie. funny how you always defend legion. funny how you ignore the second page.

good to know that you love kissing legion troll's ass.
Click to expand...

I only counted 3. If there were 4, I'm mistaken - not lying.

But what has become truly hilarious here is that you see that as some sort of huge discrepancy. You're somethin' else, Yurtsie.
 
Onceler said:
You don't think they said that?

I don't post links, Yurt. Just go to google - they said it, and you look like even more of a fool than you are for trying to dispute it. Clearly, their words make you uncomfortable, and are counter-intuitive to whatever point you're trying to make.
Click to expand...

funny how you feel justified in asking others for cites, yet, can't be bothered to cite yourself.

yawn...more boring double standard bullshit
 
none said:
funny how you feel justified in asking others for cites, yet, can't be bothered to cite yourself.

yawn...more boring double standard bullshit
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question. Do you think they didn't say that?

You're making this about "me", btw - funny how hypocritical you are.
 
Onceler said:
I only counted 3. If there were 4, I'm mistaken - not lying.

But what has become truly hilarious here is that you see that as some sort of huge discrepancy. You're somethin' else, Yurtsie.
Click to expand...

you claimed we had the same number. that is not true. if you're just mistaken, admit it, and i will retract that you lied.
 
none said:
funny how you feel justified in asking others for cites, yet, can't be bothered to cite yourself.

yawn...more boring double standard bullshit
Click to expand...

More double standard bullshit from you as well.

Dixie REGULARLY posts "facts" and will not cite his "evidence", yet no one sees you following him around badgering him for links.
 
none said:
still waiting for the cite. i can't answer you question until i see the cite. see how that works little buddy....:)
Click to expand...

No - it doesn't really work that way. Do you think I made those words up?

You know how stupid they make your OP & everything you have said on here look. That's why you're doing your usual tapdance. It's embarassing.
 
Onceler said:
You should have seen Yurt when we still had "rep points" on the board. I never paid attention to them, but I realized one day that he was absolutely crazed about them, and followed them for everyone on here.
Click to expand...

Oh I remember too.

I remember him going through entire threads groaning every single post of mine one right after another...such was the intensity of his hatred.
 
none said:
you claimed we had the same number. that is not true. if you're just mistaken, admit it, and i will retract that you lied.
Click to expand...

Sure - I just recounted. I was mistaken. He had 4, you had 3.

He didn't have 200, though. And it's gut-splitting hilarity that you were basically saying that 3 should be the limit, because that's how many you had. That narcissist definition - it is you, Yurtsie. It is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top