It was the state attorney's office, not local authorities

Nonsense...it would be nothing more than a case of citizen's arrest.

absolutely false. look up the laws on citizens arrest and stop making a fool out of yourself.

amazing how zappa defends someone offering money to MURDER someone...yet is outraged over zimmerman killing trayvon.
 
absolutely false. look up the laws on citizens arrest and stop making a fool out of yourself.

amazing how zappa defends someone offering money to MURDER someone...yet is outraged over zimmerman killing trayvon.


And of course you can show everyone where I was defending anyone offering money to murder someone...right?

Oh wait...no you can't because here's the post from USF which YOU AND I were both responding to...

Trayvon Martin: New Black Panthers offer $10,000 bounty for capture of shooter George Zimmerman

SANFORD — Members of the New Black Panther Party are offering a $10,000 reward for the "capture" of George Zimmerman, the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who shot Trayvon Martin.

What's that say?

A reward for the CAPTURE of Zimmerman?

Why, it's almost like everyone but the YURTARD knows how to read and also know the difference between "capture" and "MURDER"...what a shame that the Yurtard is too stupid to understand the difference between words like capture and murder.
 
right...you just happened to ask that question....:rolleyes:

I'm really sick of you pulling this stunt. It's maddening, frustrating, and the big reason why so many people here argue with you. I'm tired of having to cut and paste my words, just to show you through the chronology that you're taking my comments out of context.

Post 359 Christie--If they were tried then obviously a crime was committed. Where's the evidence of Martin's criminal record? Hint: school suspension for possessing traces of MJ is not a criminal record.

Post 363 Yurt--did i say martin was a thug? why do you always throw out strawmen? it is like you don't really read what i read and already have a preconcieved notion of it based on your dislike of me.
Now where in my post did I accuse you of calling Martin a thug, yurt?

Post 373 Christie--Did I accuse you of saying Martin was a thug? Why do you always throw out strawmen? It is like you don't really read what I read and already have a preconcieved notion of it based on your dislike of me.

Post 383 Yurt--right...you just happened to ask that question....:rolleyes:

You are the person who brought "thug" into this particular exchange, not me. So kindly read the exchange from the beginning before you respond, because you're making a complete fool out of yourself by trying to put your words in my mouth.
 
And of course you can show everyone where I was defending anyone offering money to murder someone...right?

Oh wait...no you can't because here's the post from USF which YOU AND I were both responding to...



What's that say?

A reward for the CAPTURE of Zimmerman?

Why, it's almost like everyone but the YURTARD knows how to read and also know the difference between "capture" and "MURDER"...what a shame that the Yurtard is too stupid to understand the difference between words like capture and murder.

you're amazing...

1. you completely ignore the fact your law is wrong and that it is not citizens arrest. typical for you, ignore your faults and insult others when you're wrong.

2. you completely ignore his answer:

asked whether he was inciting violence, Muhammad replied defiantly: "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."

funny how you claim i'm stupid...yet...capture does not necessarily mean "alive". to claim it does shows that you're the one who is actually stupid. he said quite clearly - An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. anyone with an iq above 60 knows what this means. apparently zappa doesn't. zappa also ignores their other posters that say "dead or alive".
 
If they were tried then obviously a crime was committed. Where's the evidence of Martin's criminal record?

Hint: school suspension for possessing traces of MJ is not a criminal record.

this is exactly what i'm talking about. i was not talking about martin...i was talking generally about 17 year olds. someone ELSE made the claim about martin...but christie responds to me and asks....where is martin's criminal record?

Hint: school suspension for possessing traces of MJ is not a criminal record.

i never said martin was a thug, i wasn't even talking about martin. so why the need to ask me?
 
thanks for saying dune is wrong...odd that he thanked your post

Gee, how about pointing out where I said dune was wrong, because I don't see it.

Here's a news flash, hotshot... Dune and I gave our opinions; that means we each have the freedom to say what we want about thugs, and our opinions aren't something that can be measured on a scale of right and wrong.
 
Gee, how about pointing out where I said dune was wrong, because I don't see it.

Here's a news flash, hotshot... Dune and I gave our opinions; that means we each have the freedom to say what we want about thugs, and our opinions aren't something that can be measured on a scale of right and wrong.

your words clearly indicated that 17 year olds can be thugs.

let us stop this nonsense between you and me and make things more clear, because we obviously don't communicate well.

you said 17 year olds can be thugs, dune said they cannot.

is dune right or wrong?
 
your words clearly indicated that 17 year olds can be thugs.

let us stop this nonsense between you and me and make things more clear, because we obviously don't communicate well.

you said 17 year olds can be thugs, dune said they cannot.

is dune right or wrong?

There is NO right or wrong to the question, it's all opinion. My opinion is yes, Dune's is no. How can either of us be right or wrong? We can each give perfectly plausible reasons for why we answered the way we did.

It's like asking if a 17-year old be a good parent, for example. I'd probably say no, the 17-year old would probably say yes. Who's right and who's wrong?
 
There is NO right or wrong to the question, it's all opinion. My opinion is yes, Dune's is no. How can either of us be right or wrong? We can each give perfectly plausible reasons for why we answered the way we did.

It's like asking if a 17-year old be a good parent, for example. I'd probably say no, the 17-year old would probably say yes. Who's right and who's wrong?

Actualy, I never said 17 year olds can be thugs. I called out Freedom for assuming the Martin child is a thug. I havn't seen evidence that the Martin child is a thug, yet Free is stating it as a fact.
 
Actualy, I never said 17 year olds can be thugs. I called out Freedom for assuming the Martin child is a thug. I havn't seen evidence that the Martin child is a thug, yet Free is stating it as a fact.

I apologize for not going back and reading before responding. I have freedom on ignore so I mostly miss his posts.
 
There is NO right or wrong to the question, it's all opinion. My opinion is yes, Dune's is no. How can either of us be right or wrong? We can each give perfectly plausible reasons for why we answered the way we did.

It's like asking if a 17-year old be a good parent, for example. I'd probably say no, the 17-year old would probably say yes. Who's right and who's wrong?

fair enough. in this case...i believe opinions can definitely be right or wrong. my reasoning:

thug has a certain meaning. that is fairly established and has, for the most part, a common definition. dune cannot be right, because of the common definition.

for example:

17 year olds cannot be gay

that would be dune's opinion. but, you and i both know that opinion is factually wrong.
 
I apologize for not going back and reading before responding. I have freedom on ignore so I mostly miss his posts.

You're a real piece of work. Got people on ignore. Hand out "groans" to people you don't know nor have never conversed with.

Typical left wing coward.
 
You're a real piece of work. Got people on ignore. Hand out "groans" to people you don't know nor have never conversed with.

Typical left wing coward.

Yes, let's talk about defining "a piece of work."

You came onto this forum loaded for bear with your angry attack posts. You heavily rely on the fallacy of sweeping generalization to paint the liberals here as enemies of the state and your own personal demons. When someone disagreed with a post of yours, you went immediately to cursing and vulgar gay slurs. Then you have the nerve to whine when a little bit of what you've been dishing out is handed back to you.

Dry your tears and man up, buddy. If you can't take a little payback, you're not going to last long around here.
 
Yes, let's talk about defining "a piece of work."

You came onto this forum loaded for bear with your angry attack posts. You heavily rely on the fallacy of sweeping generalization to paint the liberals here as enemies of the state and your own personal demons. When someone disagreed with a post of yours, you went immediately to cursing and vulgar gay slurs. Then you have the nerve to whine when a little bit of what you've been dishing out is handed back to you.

Dry your tears and man up, buddy. If you can't take a little payback, you're not going to last long around here.

Done yet, back-stabber?

What am I getting paid back for, loser? You're a douche. This is a political message board. Man up shut up. When you get done with your leftwing-ass BS and try to bring some actual game to the fray, let me know. Otherwise, just keep "groan-ing" me and/or put me on ignore you worthless piece of crap.
 
Back
Top