You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Are you still blaming Bush for gas prices?
- Thread starter Cancel 2018. 3
- Start date
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Yes.
:lol:
^ joke ^ but actually likely true...because bush has ties to the oil industry. obama never gets any blame.
Last edited by a moderator:
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Weird.
No, Yurt - you're not obsessed.
you're right...i'm not. though you are. not weird, just who you are.
bush gets the blame, obama gets the fame with you. nothing weird about it, it is just who you are. you are lopsided when it comes to politics.
you're right...i'm not. though you are. not weird, just who you are.
bush gets the blame, obama gets the fame with you. nothing weird about it, it is just who you are. you are lopsided when it comes to politics.
Very intelligently argued, and convincing.
Actually, it's neither of those. Just your usual hackish projection.
What a bad thread.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
lol...right
lol...right
It is right. All you're doing is proudly proclaiming your poor comprehension skills by making that allegation.
All I said in the previous conversation was that Bush got more attention on oil prices because of his ties to the oil industry; I even qualified it by saying that I didn't personally blame him when prices went up.
But, going through the Yurt filter, that is interpreted as "oh my god! Oh my god! You're blaming Bush for higher gas prices!"
Seriously - that's how it works w/ you.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you did blame him...but you're embarrassed now because you can't blame obama and you know how silly that makes you look.
you did blame him...but you're embarrassed now because you can't blame obama and you know how silly that makes you look.
It's sad that you are now repeating your own poor reading skills as fact.
You're a bad combination of hyper-partisan & dopey...
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
why do you deny what you've stated? seriously, you're very weird that way. most people can just admit their mistakes and move on, but you...nope, dig your heels in and create grand falsehoods just so you don't have to admit you're wrong.
i've never seen such an extreme example of that as i've seen with you. it borders on a serious psychological issue.
i've never seen such an extreme example of that as i've seen with you. it borders on a serious psychological issue.
why do you deny what you've stated? seriously, you're very weird that way. most people can just admit their mistakes and move on, but you...nope, dig your heels in and create grand falsehoods just so you don't have to admit you're wrong.
i've never seen such an extreme example of that as i've seen with you. it borders on a serious psychological issue.
I remember that thread very distinctly. I told you right off the bat that you were reacting in your usual knee-jerk, frantic & hyperpartisan way. I said that Bush got more attention because of his oil ties - not that it was the way I personally felt. I was pretty clear that I wasn't personally blaming him.
But that's not how you read things, or perceive the world, for that matter. It's why you're a real challenge to chat w/ on the board.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i'm not talking about any specific thread. kind of funny how you think that though.
i'm not talking about any specific thread. kind of funny how you think that though.
Oh; you're just making up that I blamed Bush out of your own warped, hyperpartisan imagination?
Believe it or not, that would actually make more sense.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
nope, not making it up. you're just projecting again onceler. for example, in your bizzaro world:
yurt - obama is eligible for office, was born in hawaii, thus US citizen
onceler - yurt is a birther!
yurt - obama is eligible for office, was born in hawaii, thus US citizen
onceler - yurt is a birther!