Right. A Registered Hispanic Democrat, who is actually "mixed race"...
So true! He's as white as Obama
Right. A Registered Hispanic Democrat, who is actually "mixed race"...
Right. A Registered Hispanic Democrat, who is actually "mixed race", who acted like a bloodthirsty registered white Republican. LOL
No. But there should always be an investigation. Even in the circumstances you describe, to make sure that man didn't come home and find someone else consensually fucking his wife, killed him, and the wife is covering for him. In this case there was no investigation to speak of. I am glad we had one now. If he is acquitted eventually, well, then a jury will have found him innocent. But the system needs to work.
No. But there should always be an investigation. Even in the circumstances you describe, to make sure that man didn't come home and find someone else consensually fucking his wife, killed him, and the wife is covering for him. In this case there was no investigation to speak of. I am glad we had one now. If he is acquitted eventually, well, then a jury will have found him innocent. But the system needs to work.
The system will have worked when Politics and public sentiment is not used to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial for defending themselves....
but in this case, Politics and public sentiment will be used to charge someone with a crime and make them stand trial.
But juries don't find you innocent, they either find you guilty or not guilty of some alleged crime. In order to get to where a jury can do this, you have to first establish a crime was committed. I'm all for having an investigation, but if the investigation shows someone was acting in accordance with the law, regardless of my feelings about the law, he isn't guilty of a crime.
And you know this is what happened because the prosecutor called you up, shared her evidence with you, and told you so right?
I loveeeee how all the whiners on here have been crying for weeks about liberals who had Made Up Their Minds Without Knowing The Facts.
Now we see who really has been guilty of that. Well, it all comes out in the wash sweetie.
There can be no facts known NOW what weren't known within 10 days of the incident.....and no charges were brought against the Hispanic then....
The only thing thats different is the politics (Obama's big mouth) and public sentiment ( the whining of the left, and the racists)threatening riots and demonstrations
and revenge against whites, whites that weren't even involved from the start.....
That's true, bad choice of words on my part.
As for the rest of this, I am not sure what you are saying. You don't know what the investigation has shown. A career prosecutor does. And if she has decided to bring charges, that's her decision to make based on the evidence you haven't seen and she has.
When you have the President and Presidential candidates commenting on this it's pretty hard at this point, imo, to say that it's not political.
crying for weeks about liberals who had Made Up Their Minds Without Knowing The Facts.
Are you denying that this is what happened......???
There can be no facts known NOW what weren't known within 10 days of the incident.....and no charges were brought against the Hispanic then....
The only thing thats different is the politics (Obama's big mouth) and public sentiment ( the whining of the left, and the racists)threatening riots and demonstrations
and revenge against whites, whites that weren't and aren't involved from the start.....
Really? What if they stab them or club them to death? Any difference in your policy? And what about sucking human beings down a tube into a collection jar, does that require we have a trial to determine guilt as well?
No disrespect intended but I do not agree with that. If it is a clear case of self-defense, a man comes home and see's someone raping his wife and attacking her with a knife or gun and he shoots that intruder, and the officers and DA agree the evidence all points to self-defense does that really need to go to trial?
Well then those facts would come out in the trial and the shooter would have nothing to worry about, would he?
No disrespect intended but I do not agree with that. If it is a clear case of self-defense, a man comes home and see's someone raping his wife and attacking her with a knife or gun and he shoots that intruder, and the officers and DA agree the evidence all points to self-defense does that really need to go to trial?
ABC news says investigators still don't know where Zimmerman is. So by this time tomorrow he could be an armed fugitive. Maybe he will turn himself in though. I guess we will find out.