poet
Banned
I've been in a committed, monogamous relationship for the past 10 years. Can you say the same? I'll bet not.
Nothing gay about it
- Thread starter Conservative
- Start date
I've been in a committed, monogamous relationship for the past 10 years. Can you say the same? I'll bet not.
poet
Banned
Well, let it be known. I'm not answering any more personal questions posed or asked by a scumbucket rightie. Speculate, instead.
Rationalist
Hail Voltaire
Rationalist
Hail Voltaire
Unable to answer a simple question. How pathetic.
No he doesn't, modern scholars state what poet claimed. It wasn't denouncing man on man love but pagan practices.
Thats irrelevant to my post......and my monogamous MARRIAGE is now going on 45 years....Sonny.
Maybe you need to read the passage again.....Romans 1:26-27: and note what it denounces....its not ambiguous in the least...
Let me clue you in Jerk......the issue here is Romans 1:26-27:......ever hear of the Bible ?......its a discussion about what it says and means.....
thats the "conversation".....its a little more than just sex.................................................fool
Apparently it is. You still don't seem to get it.
Bravo, it is the words used in the original text that loose meaning in modern translation. This has been discussed several times and you refuse to educate yourself, as do most bigots.
Amen
Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
WELCOME TO THE CULT OF THE MYTHOS BROTHER!
"it is the words used in the original text that loose meaning in modern translation."???
Thats about as stupid a claim as I've ever heard....
The original words lose their meaning in todays translation.....????
so men having sex with men and women having sex with women mean something other than what the words say ?....Is that your claim ?
shameful acts with other men doesn't mean shameful acts.....what does it mean in today translation....
filled with every kind of wickedness doesn't mean that.....what does it mean in today translation....
against nature doesn't mean against nature.....what does it mean in today translation....
Yes, bravo, you can not remove the text from the times, words have different meanings. The term homosexual wasn't even a word until recently, so the ancients would not even understand what you were referring to by the word. The passage is not referring o he same acts that you are thinking. If you ha read ny of the items I had posted you would have learned.
It is impossible for a straight woman to have sex with another woman since by definition that would be a homosexual act.
poet
Banned
Would someone tell Threedee, that he was warned about the ad hominem attacks, that I'm not answering any more questions from scumbucket righties, because they are not here to debate, and never have been, cowards that they are. Thanks.
Impossible, huh? You're an ignoramus at very best.
poet
Banned
You need to google "down low". Straight men, knowingly, and deliberately, have sex with men, and think themselves "still straight". You better not call them homosexual. They were just "getting their freak on". They have a bunch of "down low'ers" up in here, quiet as it's kept.