10 Ways the Marxist Left Manipulates Words to change history and compel behavior

[Hawkeye10]

Libhater doesn't strike me as a Carlin fan.

Who can know.....if Probable WOKE Fucks are telling the truth it is purely accidental.

 

[Libhater]

In my experience all that’s usually needed to persuade 90% of the American public on any completely idiotic idea on any idiotic issue is to be able to speak two syllable words.

My number 1 culture war issue is goofy boys name. It’s a leftist feminazi plot to soften our men up and make sissies out of them.

And I'm getting really sick of guys named Todd!


It's just a goofy - it's a goofy fucking name, OK?

Hi, what's your name?
Todd. I'm Todd. And this is Blake, and Blaire and Blaine and Brent.

Where all these goofy fucking boys names coming from?! Taylor, Tyler, Jordan, Flynn. These are not real names!

You want to hear a real name? Eddie. Eddie is a real name, whatever happened to Eddie, he was here a minute ago. Joey and Jackie and Johnny and Phil. Bobby and Tommy and Danny and Bill, what happened?

Todd. And Cody, and Dylan, and Cameron, and Tucker!

Hi Tucker, I'm Todd. Hi Todd, I'm Tucker. Fuck Tucker, Tucker sucks.

And fuck Tucker's friend, Kyle. that's another soft name for a boy, Kyle. Soft names make soft people. I'll bet you anything that ten times out of ten, Nicky, Vinnie, and Tony would beat the shit out of Todd, Kyle, and Tucker!

That’s why we need to get together and pass a Constitutional Amendment banning women from naming male children. She may bear him for nine months but that poor mother fucker has to live with that name for rest of his life.

That’s why I’m advocating for “The Boy Named Sue” Amendment and I hope I can count on your support!

There sure are a lot of goofy names out there. That's why I'm blessed to have the name Libhater in that a strong name
like that makes no one confused as to my straight-forward Conservative beliefs, my clear political standing and my undying
patriotic love for America. All those amazing gifts of having the name Libhater clearly shows up in every OP I post here, and
that most surely applies to your post.

 

[gfm7175]

Money embezzled from a company for personal benefit cannot be defined as a paycheck. It is still illegal

Flash: "A person cannot take money from a company and use it for personal benefit."

gfm7175: "A paycheck is "tak[ing] money from a company and us[ing] it for personal benefit", of which you incorrectly claimed a person cannot do.
_________________

This is where we are still at. So far, you are continuing to take the route of attempting a diversion. It is not working.

This claim of yours is WRONG. It's okay though; we all make mistakes. This is where you could simply admit "whoops, my claim was wrong, thanks for correcting me", and we could move on. But when you attempt to divert away from it, pretend that you didn't say it, or otherwise double down on stupid, then you only continue to do a disservice to yourself.

 

[Flash]

But I do. You have not shown a crime. Negative proof fallacy.

There are about 100 accusations about crimes. It is the job of the court to try these charges and determine guilty or not guilty.

You have no authority or knowledge to make that decision. If Trump is convicted for any of those indictments then they were indeed crimes.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

There are about 100 accusations about crimes. It is the job of the court to try these charges and determine guilty or not guilty.

You have no authority or knowledge to make that decision. If Trump is convicted for any of those indictments then they were indeed crimes.

When you have to explain obvious things,
they're not going to understand no matter how simple you make it.

And if by some miracle they do, it's not going to change their opinion anyway.

Right and wrong = Sunday school.
Us and Them = American politics.

 

[Flash]

When you have to explain obvious things,
they're not going to understand no matter how simple you make it.

And if by some miracle they do, it's not going to change their opinion anyway.

Right and wrong = Sunday school.
Us and Them = American politics.

They understand just fine. They just refuse to take responsibility and admit they lost the election so they will continue to make up crazy stories to perpetuate their narrative.

--if a person had more people at his rallies he had to get more votes
--the 2020 election was faulted and did not occur
--Democrats were responsible for the January 6 insurrection
--Trump committed no crimes
--Trump is a victim of witch hunts and a justice system designed to get him

It is impossible to engage in a rational debate for people who really believe this stuff. I'm not sure they all believe it or simply want to continue the discussion on JPP. They want to see how many crazy plots they can put forth.

 

[Into the Night]

There are about 100 accusations about crimes.

Baseless accusations and indictments ARE crimes. Argument from randU fallacy.

It is the job of the court to try these charges and determine guilty or not guilty.

No, it isn't. See Article III and the 6th amendment.

You have no authority or knowledge to make that decision.

Yes I do.

If Trump is convicted for any of those indictments then they were indeed crimes.

Political conviction is indeed a crime, just as baseless indictments are.

 

[Into the Night]

When you have to explain obvious things,
they're not going to understand no matter how simple you make it.

And if by some miracle they do, it's not going to change their opinion anyway.

Right and wrong = Sunday school.
Us and Them = American politics.

He's not explaining anything. He simply believes indictment is conviction.

 

[Flash]

Political conviction is indeed a crime, just as baseless indictments are.

Fallacy of the Illicit Minor

"political conviction" when someone refuses to admit he committed an illegal act and play the victim by blaming those prosecuting criminals for his actions

 

[Into the Night]

They understand just fine. They just refuse to take responsibility and admit they lost the election

There was no election in 2020. You cannot lose what never took place.

so they will continue to make up crazy stories to perpetuate their narrative.

Inversion fallacy.

--if a person had more people at his rallies he had to get more votes

Generally true, especially in the radical difference that occurred.

--the 2020 election was faulted and did not occur

Correct.

--Democrats were responsible for the January 6 insurrection

Correct.

--Trump committed no crimes

Correct.

--Trump is a victim of witch hunts and a justice system designed to get him

Correct.

It is impossible to engage in a rational debate for people who really believe this stuff.

There is no debate here. Only conversations.

I'm not sure they all believe it or simply want to continue the discussion on JPP.

The problem is you, believing the propaganda.

They want to see how many crazy plots they can put forth.

They are YOUR crazy plots.

YOU are the one that says a patriot like Trump wants to overthrow the government when he's already President!
YOU are the one that says Trump controls violent factions like Antifa, BLM, the KKK, and Proud Boys, all funded and supported by DEMOCRATS.
YOU are the one that makes up numbers.
YOU are the one that keeps misquoting the Constitution.
YOU are the one that keeps trying to pin what DEMOCRATS do on Trump.

 

[Flash]

YOU are the one that says a patriot like Trump wants to overthrow the government when he's already President!
YOU are the one that says Trump controls violent factions like Antifa, BLM, the KKK, and Proud Boys, all funded and supported by DEMOCRATS.
YOU are the one that makes up numbers.
YOU are the one that keeps misquoting the Constitution.
YOU are the one that keeps trying to pin what DEMOCRATS do on Trump.

Fallacy of the Illicit Minor

 

[Into the Night]

Fallacy of the Illicit Minor

"political conviction" when someone refuses to admit he committed an illegal act and play the victim by blaming those prosecuting criminals for his actions

Trump did not commit an illegal act. Neither did I. Fallacy fallacy. Redefinition fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Fallacy of the Illicit Minor

Fallacy fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Denial of self argument (paradox). Discard of logic.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

There sure are a lot of goofy names out there. That's why I'm blessed to have the name Libhater in that a strong name
like that makes no one confused as to my straight-forward Conservative beliefs, my clear political standing and my undying
patriotic love for America. All those amazing gifts of having the name Libhater clearly shows up in every OP I post here, and
that most surely applies to your post.

So be it but I do have a nickname for you now…Goofy.

 

[Truth Detector]

Do you do everything government "endorses"? Endorsing something is not the same as government suppression of free speech.

Many people have challenged election outcomes using legal means. When illegal conspiracies are used to question an election is when the problem begins. His legal means flopped when the House failed to support challenges and his legal cases flopped when they presented no evidence to support the claims.

Legal means do not include phony slates of electors, claiming they observed cheating which Rudy later admitted was a lie, pressuring election officials to find votes, lying to the nation that cheating occurred when none existed, and urging protesters to attack the Capitol.

Anybody who believed those lies obviously just believed the accusations without bothering to confirm anything unless they think watching YouTube videos and social media is "research."

There was no illegal conspiracy halfwit.

 

[Truth Detector]

It is called embezzlement. A person cannot take money from a company and use it for personal benefit.

When a person owns a company, they can do anything they want with THEIR money. It doesn't belong to the public. It doesn't belong to the Government.

Frightening that you actually were a teacher. No wonder we're graduating clueless idiots.

 

[Truth Detector]

If they simply "attempted" to suppress his speech but did not suppress it, his speech was not restricted. None of his speech was restricted.

This is based on the stupid conspiracy theory that the justice system is picking on Trump and he has committed no crimes. He must be a victim of a rigged system.

That is the same claim by every convicted criminal in prison.

Key word halfwit; ARRESTING him for his speech. Do try to keep up.

 

[Flash]

Key word halfwit; ARRESTING him for his speech. Do try to keep up.

Misunderstanding on your part. He was not arrested for his speech but for conspiracy to overturn the election. The speech was merely evidence of the plot.

Claiming he is being prosecuted for "speech" is one of the wilder claims made by MAGA supporters. They seem willing to believe anything the PR people can invent.

 

[Flash]

There was no illegal conspiracy halfwit.

Not yet. Wait until the some of the indictments result in guilty verdicts. Then there will be an illegal conspiracy; much like the January 6 convictions for seditious conspiracy.

 

[ExpressLane]

The Biden administration through its intelligence agencies and departments of State, Health, and Education--promote a certain acceptable word speak and ideology. They work hand in hand with social media giants and a compliant liberal media to force this tyrannical suppression of speech.

Below are 10 ways in which the Marxists and Leftists have changed the meaning of words in America today:

1.) Keeping pornography out of school is redefined as "book banning."

2.) Illegal aliens are redefined as "asylum-seekers."

3.) Opposing the genital mutilation of minors is redefined as opposing healthcare for trans kids and supporting LGBTQ+ legislation.

4.) Opposing the idea of having female athletes overpowered by biological male competitors is redefined as discriminating against trans athletes.

5.) Being opposed to a regulation requiring mortgage applicants with good credit scores subsidizing those with bad scores is being against efforts
to bolster home-ownership for the disadvantaged.

6.) Criticizing the Los Angeles Dodgers for giving an award to a drag queen company that mocks the crucified Jesus Christ, nuns, and Catholics is
redefined as being intolerant to gays.

7.) Parents who complain about their white children being taught they are racist and Black children being taught they are helpless victims are
redefined as being domestic terrorists.

8.) Pedophiles are redefined as "people attracted to minors."

9.) A mother is redefined as a "birthing person."

10.) A girl is redefined as "assigned female at birth."


If you scoffed at ever believing you could succumb to the state's will by saying two plus two equals five, ask yourself if you are now unwittingly
repeating any of the left's new acceptable word speak listed above.

More than pretty creepy, isn't it?


Steve Levy, President of Common Sense Strategies

Indeed SPOT ON!