151 DNA samples were taken from mummies. A grand total of 0 of them came back as black

Dutch Uncle said:
Geographical origin and similar ancestry, yes, but there's no such thing as race. Just regional similarities for the reason you mentioned: inbreeding.

Kinda like hillbilly MAGAts who have a family tree that looks like a Festivus pole.
Click to expand...
:eyeroll:

There are some days when I sorely regret my vow to keep my ignore list empty.
 
And just like that........suddenly the left is anti SCIENCE! :) Just like the time I posted obesity rates by race in here a few years back. Then they wanted MORE links,....so I posted more, then they wanted EVEN MORE,...so I posted them too. Then it turned out that every single link and source all came up to the same conclusions. Then they were like......" yeah,...well fuck science!

:magagrin:
 
Callinectes said:
An excellent question! For an answer (that probably won't make sense), ask the vegetable-in-chief. It's from his "dark brandon" speech a couple years ago. I laughed very hard.
Click to expand...
If "dark brandon" is a vegetable why are you upset by his statements?
 
AProudLefty said:
Garbage Human
151 DNA samples were taken from mummies. A grand total of 0 of them came back as black.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
That would probably be somewhat correct, but a little misleading.

It really does not make sense to talk about skin color, but they were mostly very dark skinned, but not quite Black. It would be doubtful that any of the original population had blue eyes as shown in the picture.

More sense is to talk about Sub-Saharan African, which the original Egyptians were definitely not. They were Northern African/Middle Eastern. They were definitely not European, but were descendent from the one small group that left Sub-Sahara Africa, like the Europeans, Chinese, Australians, Native Americans, etc.

But add into that that Egypt was conquered several times, with other groups also moving in. One of the other groups was the Nubians, who definitely were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry. They clearly mixed with the Egyptians, so depending on the time period, there would be some Sub-Saharan African ancestry.

Another group that conquered and immigrated to Egypt was the Greeks, who were definitely European. That added European ancestry into the mix of later Egypt. After Alexander the Great, there could actually be blue eyed Egyptians.
 
Callinectes said:
Only rich, royal or influential people were mummified. And they were an incestuous bunch. It's not surprising they're all the same race and have the same geographical origin.
Click to expand...
Almost all Egyptians at least attempted to have themselves mummified. We mostly view the amazing mummies, but there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of bland mummies.

A random example would be the Zagreb Mummy. It was bought by a minor Austro-Hungarian civil servant, and the only reason anyone is really interested in it was the linen used to make it was recycled from an Etruscan book. It is the most complete Etruscan writing in existence. The mummy probably had no link to the Etruscans, other than the recycled linen was the cheapest thing the embalmers could find.

It would appear that the mummy may have been the wife of a tailor in Thebes, or that the wife of a tailor in Thebes shared the same tomb as the mummy. Either way, the mummy would almost certainly have been a wife of a tradesperson.

A tradesperson would not be as poor as a subsistence farmer. They would have some money. Her family sacrificed as much of that money as they could to try to get her into a good place in the afterlife. That bought a recycled linen mummification.
 
Walt said:
That would probably be somewhat correct, but a little misleading.

It really does not make sense to talk about skin color, but they were mostly very dark skinned, but not quite Black. It would be doubtful that any of the original population had blue eyes as shown in the picture.

More sense is to talk about Sub-Saharan African, which the original Egyptians were definitely not. They were Northern African/Middle Eastern. They were definitely not European, but were descendent from the one small group that left Sub-Sahara Africa, like the Europeans, Chinese, Australians, Native Americans, etc.

But add into that that Egypt was conquered several times, with other groups also moving in. One of the other groups was the Nubians, who definitely were of Sub-Saharan African ancestry. They clearly mixed with the Egyptians, so depending on the time period, there would be some Sub-Saharan African ancestry.

Another group that conquered and immigrated to Egypt was the Greeks, who were definitely European. That added European ancestry into the mix of later Egypt. After Alexander the Great, there could actually be blue eyed Egyptians.
Click to expand...
Shhhh, you know how important melanin levels are to the Libtards. Show some concern for their mental health, we've had enough breakdowns lately.
 
Tobytone said:
Shhhh, you know how important melanin levels are to the Libtards. Show some concern for their mental health, we've had enough breakdowns lately.
Click to expand...
They're also important to MAGAts. Otherwise why would they keep trying to suppress the votes of those darker than a lunch paper bag?

8wxfad.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
They're also important to MAGAts. Otherwise why would they keep trying to suppress the votes of those darker than a lunch paper bag?

8wxfad.jpg
Click to expand...
Oh damn it, I thought maybe you'd give a shining example for other libtards to follow and actually defend you sick views. If libtards agree with the actual definition of racism, shouldn't someone speak up and defend themselves? So, do you think people darker than a paper bag should continue to be look down on by Libtards everywhere by insisting on lower standards to level the playing field? See, for me, because I'm not a racist and never have been, I can say no, instantly without pause. Any lefties able to do that?
 
Walt said:
Almost all Egyptians at least attempted to have themselves mummified. We mostly view the amazing mummies, but there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of bland mummies.

A random example would be the Zagreb Mummy. It was bought by a minor Austro-Hungarian civil servant, and the only reason anyone is really interested in it was the linen used to make it was recycled from an Etruscan book. It is the most complete Etruscan writing in existence. The mummy probably had no link to the Etruscans, other than the recycled linen was the cheapest thing the embalmers could find.

It would appear that the mummy may have been the wife of a tailor in Thebes, or that the wife of a tailor in Thebes shared the same tomb as the mummy. Either way, the mummy would almost certainly have been a wife of a tradesperson.

A tradesperson would not be as poor as a subsistence farmer. They would have some money. Her family sacrificed as much of that money as they could to try to get her into a good place in the afterlife. That bought a recycled linen mummification.
Click to expand...

Interesting. Thank you!
 
Taichiliberal said:
You're not too bright no matter how many times you change your screen name. Things just whoosh over your head! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Apparently, you're not exactly Einstein. Never changed my 'screen name' I have however recently updated my Avatar. A nice collage of various scenes of Hive Masters leading what can be described as a herd of sheep with a one special skill, talking like Parrots. I think it a beautiful depiction of the lovable Libtards doing what they do.
 
Tobytone said:
Apparently, you're not exactly Einstein. Never changed my 'screen name' I have however recently updated my Avatar. A nice collage of various scenes of Hive Masters leading what can be described as a herd of sheep with a one special skill, talking like Parrots. I think it a beautiful depiction of the lovable Libtards doing what they do.
Click to expand...
You're a liar. Period. Anyone who's been on this site for a few years knows your moronic writing style. You can run toodles, but you can't hide.

You ignore what you don't like and blow smoke when you can't debunk/disprove what others post.

You're just a maga troll who babbles like a GED failure instead of rational/logical fully fact based debating. Hope you're at least getting paid scale. Carry on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top