41 killed in Afghan blast caused by vehicle bombs

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
41 killed in Afghan blast caused by vehicle bombs

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan – A cluster of vehicle bombs detonated simultaneously Tuesday near a foreign-owned company that plans to build a road through an insurgent-held area. At least 41 people were killed, all civilians, officials said.

...

It appeared the main target was the Japanese company that is involved in reconstruction efforts in the southern Afghan city. The company recently took over a contract to build a road that insurgents had stalled for several months.

...

The deaths bring to 41 the number of U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan this month, the second deadliest month in the country since the 2001 U.S. invasion. Last month a record 44 U.S. troops died.

This year has been the deadliest of the war for U.S. troops. Including the latest deaths, at least 172 American forces have died in the Afghan war this year, according to an Associated Press count.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/as_afghan_violence

no mention of obama.....strange, i recall when bad stuff happened when bush was CIC, he always was mentioned....deadliest year ever, deadliest month ever and second deadliest month ever....all under obama's watch
 
"no mention of obama.....strange, i recall when bad stuff happened when bush was CIC, he always was mentioned....deadliest year ever, deadliest month ever and second deadliest month ever....all under obama's watch "

Give it up. Oh, my lord - could you be more hyperbolic?

What do you recall..."and there were x number of casualties, in this war that Bush started and lied us into..."

This schtick is getting OLD.....
 
Never mind - I see why you had to insert the Bush/Obama factor.

Because your PREVIOUS assertion was that the media doesn't touch these stories now, and I see this is being covered on both CNN & MSNBC.

Oh, well - keep at it!
 
"no mention of obama.....strange, i recall when bad stuff happened when bush was CIC, he always was mentioned....deadliest year ever, deadliest month ever and second deadliest month ever....all under obama's watch "

Give it up. Oh, my lord - could you be more hyperbolic?

What do you recall..."and there were x number of casualties, in this war that Bush started and lied us into..."

This schtick is getting OLD.....

its not hyperbole, it is what i remember....it is only old because its not against bush

deadliest year ever, deadliest month ever and second deadliest month ever....all under obama's watch

^fact^

not hyperbole....learn the difference sporto
 
Never mind - I see why you had to insert the Bush/Obama factor.

Because your PREVIOUS assertion was that the media doesn't touch these stories now, and I see this is being covered on both CNN & MSNBC.

Oh, well - keep at it!

false....i never said that....

next
 
its not hyperbole, it is what i remember....it is only old because its not against bush

deadliest year ever, deadliest month ever and second deadliest month ever....all under obama's watch

^fact^

not hyperbole....learn the difference sporto

Nah - it's over the top. If you search your posts, I'd wager that a good half of them are under the theme "they did/felt/said this for Bush, but not for Obama!"

In this case, it's just silly.
 
You deny implying that the media was turning a blind eye to casualties under Obama?

How predictably dishonest of you.

you're such a dishonest weasel.....you said:

doesn't touch these stories now

i never said that...i said they do not report them as much and the stories are around for about a day....watch, this story will be very short lived despite the incredible facts below

that is not the same as "don't touch"

try some honesty before calling others on it

deadliest year, deadliest month, 2nd deadliest month....all under obama's watch
 
Nah - it's over the top. If you search your posts, I'd wager that a good half of them are under the theme "they did/felt/said this for Bush, but not for Obama!"

In this case, it's just silly.

your hypocrisy is amusing.....and btw....how much would you like to bet....damo can be the money holder
 
LOL

You're a hoot. Love the semantic games...it all depends on what the meaning of "is" is...

yeah....its called english, learn it or stfu....simple really....if you're going to make claims, make sure they are accurate or you will get called on your BS
 
41 killed in Afghan blast caused by vehicle bombs

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan – A cluster of vehicle bombs detonated simultaneously Tuesday near a foreign-owned company that plans to build a road through an insurgent-held area. At least 41 people were killed, all civilians, officials said.

...

It appeared the main target was the Japanese company that is involved in reconstruction efforts in the southern Afghan city. The company recently took over a contract to build a road that insurgents had stalled for several months.

...

The deaths bring to 41 the number of U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan this month, the second deadliest month in the country since the 2001 U.S. invasion. Last month a record 44 U.S. troops died.

This year has been the deadliest of the war for U.S. troops. Including the latest deaths, at least 172 American forces have died in the Afghan war this year, according to an Associated Press count.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/as_afghan_violence

no mention of obama.....strange, i recall when bad stuff happened when bush was CIC, he always was mentioned....deadliest year ever, deadliest month ever and second deadliest month ever....all under obama's watch

Afghanistan is and will be every bit the clusterfuck that Iraq and Vietnam were .. but it's how we do business.

We are in the business of mass-murder for profit .. and if we don't kill the innocent ourselves, we are the biggest arms dealer on the planet and we'll sell you the weapons to kill 'em yourself.

BOTH American political parties believe in the business of war .. and the American people are dumb as a bag of rocks .. easily controlled.
 
You deny implying that the media was turning a blind eye to casualties under Obama?

How predictably dishonest of you.

The MSM ALWAYS turns a blind eye to casualties .. did so in Iraq until alternative media forced them to talk about casulaties .. and, without a doubt MSM is giving the US casualties AND civilian casualties in Afghanistan slight coverage today.

If the true story of Afghanistan is to be told, alternative media will have to tell that story.

Surely the failure of the Fourth Estate does not come as a surprise to you my brother.
 
as i predicted onceler.....nothing about this in the msm today.....just as i said...about one day....

no "deadliest month", no "deadliest year" since afghan started....we were treated to those very headlines under bush.....now its obama....basically silent...

a tragic display of partisanship politics by the media
 
as i predicted onceler.....nothing about this in the msm today.....just as i said...about one day....

no "deadliest month", no "deadliest year" since afghan started....we were treated to those very headlines under bush.....now its obama....basically silent...

a tragic display of partisanship politics by the media

I would have predicted the same thing.

In the other thread, I said that stories like this never went on for days; unless their was something to feed the story, like the investigation of Haditha.

You're such a hack; always desperate for the double-standard...
 
The MSM ALWAYS turns a blind eye to casualties .. did so in Iraq until alternative media forced them to talk about casulaties .. and, without a doubt MSM is giving the US casualties AND civilian casualties in Afghanistan slight coverage today.

If the true story of Afghanistan is to be told, alternative media will have to tell that story.

Surely the failure of the Fourth Estate does not come as a surprise to you my brother.

Yeah - you don't have to tell me. I'm still amazed at the absence of the media in the lead-up to war.
 
I would have predicted the same thing.

In the other thread, I said that stories like this never went on for days; unless their was something to feed the story, like the investigation of Haditha.

You're such a hack; always desperate for the double-standard...

not hack and not desperate....we both agree, just not on the reasons....and under bush i am positive that such stories stayed up on the internet at least for days....especially Yahoo!....there is nothing hackish or desperate about that onceler....if you're going to call opinions and memories hackish, then i suggest you never state yours
 
Back
Top