5 reasons why 'high' capacity mags are essential for self defense

Anything more than single shot is considered a 'high capacity magazine' by some idjits here!

Like whom? Pistols hold about 6 bullets. Is that high capacity? Some can do more, I added that because bird the quibbler is here. As usual, he presumes to speak for other people and is wrong again.
 
Last edited:
As poorly written as our constitution is, and it is indeed pretty fucked up,
the fucking republican deplorables manage to make it significantly worse with their
braindead interpretations of it.

They have the reading comprehension of paramecia.
 
Like whom? Pistols hold about 6 bullets. Is that high capacity? Some can do more, I added that because bird the quibbler is here. As usual, he presumes to speak for other people and is wrong again.

Revolvers hold typically 6 rounds. Semi-automatic pistols hold anywhere from about 7 to 15 depending on the size and caliber of the pistol. A typical 9mm full size pistol holds 15 rounds in a magazine.
 
Revolvers hold typically 6 rounds. Semi-automatic pistols hold anywhere from about 7 to 15 depending on the size and caliber of the pistol. A typical 9mm full size pistol holds 15 rounds in a magazine.

There are JPP members who want to ban all semiautos.....but they might not have known what they were talking about.
 
As poorly written as our constitution is, and it is indeed pretty fucked up,
the fucking republican deplorables manage to make it significantly worse with their
braindead interpretations of it.

They have the reading comprehension of paramecia.

the Constitution was not written poorly. the fucking democrat deplorables also have serious comprehension issues
 
the Constitution was not written poorly. the fucking democrat deplorables also have serious comprehension issues

Yes, it was. It was general because the founders were smart enough to know they could not predict the future. Franklin said every generation should rewrite it to suit the times. For some reason, he said every 19 years. The founders did not think it was a holy writ. They knew it would change for the times. Now rightys think they know what they were thinking and believed and it should not be changed. They battled over the writing of the constitution because the articles of confederation failed. It was not a happy constitution to many.
 
Yes, it was. It was general because the founders were smart enough to know they could not predict the future. Franklin said every generation should rewrite it to suit the times. For some reason, he said every 19 years. The founders did not think it was a holy writ. They knew it would change for the times. Now rightys think they know what they were thinking and believed and it should not be changed. They battled over the writing of the constitution because the articles of confederation failed. It was not a happy constitution to many.

they created an amendment process for those changing times, NOT so that the government could step in and redefine their limits and restrictions. NOBODY has to know what they were thinking, only what they wrote about it.

lastly, WE THE PEOPLE are the owners of that Constitution. WE THE PEOPLE ratified it. It belongs to us, not to the courts. the courts are bound by the limitations placed upon them by that Constitution. And it was Jefferson that said it should be rewritten, not Franklin.
 
they created an amendment process for those changing times, NOT so that the government could step in and redefine their limits and restrictions. NOBODY has to know what they were thinking, only what they wrote about it.

lastly, WE THE PEOPLE are the owners of that Constitution. WE THE PEOPLE ratified it. It belongs to us, not to the courts. the courts are bound by the limitations placed upon them by that Constitution. And it was Jefferson that said it should be rewritten, not Franklin.

Many Repubs say they are going by what the founders thought and intended. You 2nd amendment lovers misinterpret it badly. I have never had to shoot my way out to the mall and back. Over 80 percent of cops never pull their guns. Yet you guys need military gear to go anywhere. You do not. And we all suffer from that misbelief.
 
Many Repubs say they are going by what the founders thought and intended. You 2nd amendment lovers misinterpret it badly.
many Repubs might do those things. I, as a Libertarian, do not. I read the writings of the founders and their many various mentions of arms and the 2nd Amendment and it's very clear

I have never had to shoot my way out to the mall and back.[/QUOTE]
hyperbole loses an argument

Over 80 percent of cops never pull their guns. Yet you guys need military gear to go anywhere. You do not. And we all suffer from that misbelief.
when seconds count, police are only minutes away. So, if even cops rarely pull their guns, then gun laws are not needed, are they?
 
many Repubs might do those things. I, as a Libertarian, do not. I read the writings of the founders and their many various mentions of arms and the 2nd Amendment and it's very clear

I have never had to shoot my way out to the mall and back.
hyperbole loses an argument


when seconds count, police are only minutes away. So, if even cops rarely pull their guns, then gun laws are not needed, are they?[/QUOTE]

Cops are trained professionals. You gun lusters are not. The point is cops who go into the worst circumstances and meet the worst people rarely have to pull a gun out., Even fewer have to shoot them But you guys think you require military weapons and huge clips for safety. Of course, a gun in your home makes it more likely a family member will be shot.
 
There is no such thing as a high capacity mag.

5f083037ff93becda98e91a356d72e9d.gif
 
Back
Top